[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430438 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1330:
---
How does the PermissionsCache work with respect to passing two type of keys to
represent the same PermissionDescriptor? If an
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430533 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Yip, the NPE behavrior you are describing is something I had run into before
the dependency manager (DM) was
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430545 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1330:
---
Mamta, thanks for those jira links. My actual concern is the working of the
permission cache. From what I interpret from those
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430551 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Yip, I thought you were running into NPE with the functionality implemented so
far.
As for when the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430565 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1330:
---
Yes, it is unfortunate indeed. The permissions cache won't work properly when
we are dealing with 2 types of keys associated with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430191 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Yip, I would like to debug the behavior you mentioned. Do you have a test case
that I could try to reproduce the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430325 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1330:
---
Mamta, one can reproduce this by reading the entries from SYSDEPENDS that has a
row that have a tableperms as its provider id. For
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430351 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1330:
---
I noticed getPersistentProviderInfos() are overloaded, so to be precise, call
getPersistentProviderInfos(Dependent) with a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425914 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1330:
--
I want to be certain that I understand cascading object dependencies. Please
correct any errors that I have in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425919 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Laura, your understanding of the current behavior for revoke statement and
views is correct.
This behavior
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425933 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Basically, during an object create time, Derby will first look for the required
privilege at the user level. If
*** (LS) Thank you Mamta. This is very helpful. I don't think that
the Derby docs do a good job of describing the difference between user
authentication and user authorization, and I will update the draft
text that I posted for grant/revoke to make it more clear what the
different properties
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12424980 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1330:
--
In the spec AuthorizationModelForDerbySQLStandardAuthorizationV2.html, I am not
sure that I understand the sentences
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12422435 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Patch Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV10diff.txt Committed revision 423949. -
Thanks Mamta
Provide
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12422262 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
I get this compile error applying this patch;
Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV8diff.txt
[javac]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12421902 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Please disregard change to RAFContainer.java in
Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV8diff.txt. Let me know if I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12421961 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Patch Derby1330MinorCleanupV7diff.txt applied - Committed revision 423232. -
thanks Mamta
Provide
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12422021 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1330:
Committed DERBY-1330javaDocWarningsDiffV9.txt patch to trunk with revision
423352. Note that in two cases, the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420911 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Just wondered if anyone got a chance to look at the patch
Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV6diff.txt. This one is a
Mike Matrigali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420145
]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Mike responded following on the mailing list
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420337 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
I have come across one test failure in derbyall suite with my changes, so
please don't commit the latest patch just yet.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420499 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Mamta wrote:
- In my earlier patch, I had forgotten to reset the uuid in
TablePrivilegeInfo.executeGrantRevoke
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420503 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV5diff.txt Patch committed - Committed
revision 421118 - Thanks Mamta!
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420027 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1330:
---
I have seen this regression test failure a couple of times lately. Could it be
related to this issue?
* Diff
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420121 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Knut, the diffs you are noticing is in one of the new tests that I added to
grantRevokeDDL.sql
The diff is for following
Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA) wrote:
Is this a Java behavior that you can count on the order in which items will be added and retrieved from HashMap?
At this point, I am not sure, how to make sure that items get added and
retrieved in the same order from the HashMap so that we will have
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420145 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Mike responded following on the mailing list
quote
I do not believe you can count on the order of a HashMap, different
JVM's
Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420145 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Mike responded following on the mailing list
quote
I do not believe you can count on the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12419921 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Patch Derby1330PrivilegeCollectionV3diff.txt Committed revision 420306 - Thanks
Mamta
Provide runtime privilege
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12419887 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
derbyall suite finished with no new failures.
Provide runtime privilege checking for grant/revoke functionality
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12419792 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
I'm starting to look at the patch, I'm a little confused by your references to
'add a row to SYSDEPENDS'. Is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12419797 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
I am using the dependency manager and not touching SYSDEPENDS directly through
my code changes. I will change the code
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12419836 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
What would be really helpful if was if this patch was split into multiple
patches.
I'm finally realizing the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12419438 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Wondered if anyone got a chance to look at the patch.
Provide runtime privilege checking for grant/revoke functionality
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12418661 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Comment on QueryTreeNode changes and related items:
I think the logic for what you are trying to do is correct,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12418678 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Based on Dan's feedback on QueryNode, I am proposing the method name to be
changed from isExecutingWithInvokerPrivileges to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12418146 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Just from a quick look at the patch there are many cases where you add a new
method or field and add comments,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12418151 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
I will go ahead and change those comments to javadoc comments. Should have done
them proactively :( I will wait for more
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12413026 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Interesting idea from Dan... about need to have SYSREQUIREDPERM system table.
It does look possible,
39 matches
Mail list logo
