[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12431277 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
Our application is too network-server centric to run in embedded mode.
Actually, you wouldn't need to change your application at all.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12431066 ]
Prasenjit Sarkar commented on DERBY-1633:
-
I dont think this issue is resolved yet: I got a SQL error (same as above) for
the following query that works
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12431073 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
Thanks for continuing to test this particular fix, Prasenjit.
I assume the query in the above comment is supposed to be run agains the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12431091 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
Does the above query work if you run it against Derby embedded instead of
client/server? If it works in embedded but not with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12431123 ]
Prasenjit Sarkar commented on DERBY-1633:
-
Our application is too network-server centric to run in embedded mode. I would
like to help you in any other
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12430064 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1633:
--
Committed the d1633_v3 patches at subversion revision 434111.
Regression: The fields of views are not being
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12430098 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
Thanks so much for the review and commit, Rick! (it looks like I'm not getting
Jira emails, so I didn't see this comment until just
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12430139 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1633:
--
Hi Army. Yes, I will port this to 10.2 too.
Regression: The fields of views are not being calculated properly since
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12429738 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1633:
--
Hi Army. Thanks for the new patch and the extensive explanation in this JIRA
and in the code. I am inclined to check
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12429520 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
I applied the _v3 patches and ran derbyall on Red Hat Linux with ibm142 against
sane jars with no new failures. So as mentioned in my
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12428416 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1633:
Reply to Rick's comments can be found here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/26853
Thanks for reviewing, Rick!
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=comments#action_12428256 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1633:
--
Thanks for the extensive analysis, Army! This has helped me to understand some
of the issues. At this point I'm
Thank you for volunteering to review the DERBY-1633 changes, Rick! I welcome
and appreciate your comments.
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
I lost the thread of your explanation when I got to OBS#2 in DERBY-1633_v2.html.
I did not understand this statement: When a predicate is pushed to a UNION
13 matches
Mail list logo