[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12442313 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-183:
---
I believe that RoutineAliasInfo.getParameterNames()[n] will return the empty
string.
It's a bit hard to figure this
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12442083 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-183:
---
Thanks James! This patch resolved my derbyall issues; my run was 100% clean.
The patch looks good to me; I intend to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12442087 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-183:
-
If a routine's parameter is created without a parameter name, then what will
this expression return for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12441837 ]
James F. Adams commented on DERBY-183:
--
I have a patch ready that should resolve the remaining test issues. I
currently can not upload an attachments. Issue
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12441215 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-183:
---
Hi James, thanks for the updated patch, and for the clear explanation of the
LOOKAHEAD behaviors.
The tests look
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12441319 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-183:
---
When I ran derbyall, lang/procedure.java failed in the DerbyNet and
DerbyNetClient frameworks.
There are multiple
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12440771 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-183:
---
Hello James, thanks for looking at this problem, and thanks for the patch!
It would be nice if the patch included
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-183?page=comments#action_12440773 ]
James F. Adams commented on DERBY-183:
--
I will create some test cases as suggested and add an explanation why the
additional lookahead is needed in the
