[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12418258 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-822:
--
Kathey Marsden wrote:
1) Queries may fail earlier. Instead of failing on the ResultSet
next() call, they may now
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12418123 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-822:
--
I think we probably need to check the Existing application Impact box on this
issue and provide a release note because I think
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12376757 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-822:
--
I noticed that on the day of this checkin, lang/simpleScroll.sql, and
lang/scrollCursors1.sql with JCC 2.5 (56) started failing
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12374837 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-822:
---
Thank you for investigating my feedback. This has become a very elegant change,
and I have no further suggestions to make. Great
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-822:
Thank you very much for the clear and detailed answers, Knut Anders.
Your explanations make sense to me.
Thanks, I'll upload a new patch with the suggested modifications.
I think it would indeed be nice,
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-822:
Thank you very much for the clear and detailed answers, Knut Anders.
Your explanations make sense to me.
I think it would indeed be nice, if you have the time, to record
the discussion about whether we should have the configurable options
(block
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12373927 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-822:
--
Thank you for looking at the patch, Bryan! Your comments are valuable,
as always. I have tried to answer your questions
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12373790 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-822:
---
Hi Knut Anders.
This diff is a lot easier to read now that DERBY-1014 has been separated out.
Very nice!
I read through the
Kathey Marsden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not convinced that the comment about LMTBLKPRC is correct, I
think it is also allowed for FIXROWPRC. Will look more into that.
I think so, too, although there are a
I am not convinced that the comment about LMTBLKPRC is correct, I
think it is also allowed for FIXROWPRC. Will look more into that.
I think so, too, although there are a number of restrictions in the
fixed row query protocol case. From page 126 of DRDA V.1:
For the fixed row query protocol,
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not convinced that the comment about LMTBLKPRC is correct, I
think it is also allowed for FIXROWPRC. Will look more into that.
I think so, too, although there are a number of restrictions in the
fixed row query protocol case. From page 126 of
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not convinced that the comment about LMTBLKPRC is correct, I
think it is also allowed for FIXROWPRC. Will look more into that.
I think so, too, although there are a number of restrictions in the
fixed row query
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12365915 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-822:
--
Brief status update...
This seems easier than I first thought. In theory, at least... When
the server receives an OPNQRY
13 matches
Mail list logo