[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_6.diff
DERBY -1156 (partial) (re) encryption of an existing database.
This patch adds code required to correctly handle
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencryptspec_1.html
Minor updated to the spec.
allow the encrypting of an existing unencrypted db and allow the
re-encrypting of an
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1156:
-
Urgency: Low
allow the encrypting of an existing unencrypted db and allow the
re-encrypting of an existing encrypted db
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_5.diff
DERBY -1156 (partial) re-encryption of the database.
This patch adds a new test that tests recovery of the database
if
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1156:
--
Here are my comments on review of the reencrypt_4.diff, also I am running
storeall but it has not finished yet.:
minor typo's:
XactFactory.java line 835 -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1156:
--
storeall ran fine with sun jdk1.4.2 on xp - with patch reencrypt_4
allow the encrypting of an existing unencrypted db and allow the
re-encrypting of an
Suresh Thalamati wrote:
I think returning Ok (true) is not a right thing to do unless I really
check the versions by reading the versions from the control files ..etc.
Current usage of this function is to make sure database is at the right
version before doing any writes that will
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_4.diff
DERBY -1156 (partial)
This patch adds some code required to support reconfigure(rencryption) of
an already existing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1156:
--
i reviewed and tested reencrypt_3.diff patch. it looks fine, i will let you
commit. Still would like to see more testing, especially exercising the abort
Mike Matrigali (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1156:
--
i reviewed and tested reencrypt_3.diff patch. it looks fine, i will let you commit. Still would like to see more testing,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_3.diff
DERBY -1156 (partial)
This patch adds some code required to support reconfigure(rencryption) of
an already existing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_2.diff
Attached patch (reencrypt_2,.diff ) fixes the encryptDatabaseTest1.sql test
failure on Solaris regression runs. This
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1156:
--
I have reviewed this patch and run a full set of tests on windows XP / sun
jdk1.4.2 which passed. I think this patch should be committed as is. It is a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_1.diff
DERBY -1156 ( first patch)
This patch adds some code required to support to configure an
existing database for encryption
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: encryptspec.html
Attached is a functional/design spec that describes database encryption
enhancements, I plan to implement for 10.2
15 matches
Mail list logo