+1
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote On 08/09/06 12:25,:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427012 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Actually, the deadline has been pushed back to:
On 8/9/06, David Van Couvering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
ok, I'll take care of updating the java files in functionTests/tests
and then move this out to 10.2.2.
andrew
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427012
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Actually, the deadline has been pushed back to:
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
The only remaining work for this issue is coming up for a
solution to adding the license header to the .sql test files
in o.a.dT.fT.tests (and possibly their associated master
files as well).
Looks like java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/SqlXmlUtil.java
On 8/9/06, Army [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/SqlXmlUtil.java slipped
through the cracks, probably because it was added as part of a DERBY-688 commit
right in the middle of the DERBY-1377 effort yesterday.
find java -name *.java -print | xargs
Great! IMHO, if anyone feels something is creative work, it should have
the header, so thanks for nailing the message files as well.
David
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426643 ]
Andrew McIntyre
I wouldn't mind the delay. Let us know what answer comes around on this
one.
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425969 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
OK. From my perspective it looks good, pretty basic switch.
David
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425877 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
We are about 3 weeks away from generating a release candidate which must
conform to a new, murky policy. These options occur to me:
1) Generate a release which follows the old policy. I would imagine that
the DB PMC would feel bound to reject such a release.
2) Wait for the policy to sort
I have to say I don't understand where we stand at this point. If
anybody can give me a recipe of what I should be doing I would
appreciate it...
David
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422783 ]
David Van Couvering wrote:
I have to say I don't understand where we stand at this point. If
anybody can give me a recipe of what I should be doing I would
appreciate it...
I suggest you hold off doing anything yet, and give this time to sort out.
-jean
David
Daniel John Debrunner
11 matches
Mail list logo
