Mike Matrigali wrote (2006-03-22 11:22:39):
I am not aware of any work being done. My only concern is that such an
implementation does not the affect the performance of existing index
operations. I would be interested in knowing what approach you are
considering to address it.
Some
Hi David,
Yes, that is my understanding. I don't know any other way to address
defects discovered during the stabilization/trashathon period.
Regards,
-Rick
David W. Van Couvering wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some clarity here. Feature freeze is
soon approaching, but won't we be
I agree that these 2 approaches should not affect performance of the
index. I only bring it up as I once looked at a third option which
put all the work in the index, which involved sometimes treating
the nulls as different and sometimes the same - as you can imagine
it added some ugly special
Oyvind Bakksjo wrote (2006-03-21 12:11:41):
Hi folks, long time no see. :)
I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time,
but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which Rick H
created and then closed himself during a discussion in October. I think
I am not aware of any work being done. My only concern is that such an
implementation does not the affect the performance of existing index
operations. I would be interested in knowing what approach you are
considering to address it.
Oyvind Bakksjo wrote:
Hi folks, long time no see. :)
I
Oyvind Bakksjo wrote:
I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time,
but more than zero time ;o).
Welcome back Oyvind!Feature freeze for 10.2 is fast approaching . I
hope you will also consider picking up a bug or two. According to
Jira, we currently have 155
Hi folks, long time no see. :)I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time, but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which Rick H created and then closed himself during a discussion in October. I think it would be nice if Derby behaved correctly
Hi Øyvind,
Welcome back! Delighted to see you have not escaped our gravitational pull!
Personally, I don't have any strong feelings about this JIRA, but it is
grounded in the real customer experience of Dan Meany. For the record,
the relevant section of the SQL 2003 spec is Part 2, section
Oyvind Bakksjo wrote:
Hi folks, long time no see. :)
Hi Øyvind! Great to have you back
I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full
time, but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which
Rick H created and then closed himself during a discussion in
