[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1248?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1248:
--
Attachment: test5.zip
Attached 'test5.zip' which contains logs/db from a failure in
OnlineBackupTest5.sql.
Assert failure in BasePage.shiftUp()
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1393?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1393:
--
Summary: PreparedStatement.setObject(int,Object,int) should throw
SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for unsupported types (was:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1393?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-1393:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Thanks Bryan! Committed revision 420436.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1364?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen closed DERBY-1364:
-
Client driver does not roll back the effects of a stored procedure when
incorrectly invoked by executeQuery()/executeUpdate()
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1039?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen closed DERBY-1039:
-
Database creation should fail if specified log device path already exists
EmbeddedDriver does not implement PreparedStatement.setNull(int, int, String)
-
Key: DERBY-1493
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1493
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1493?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1493:
--
Description: The embedded driver throws Util.notImplemented() when
PreparedStatement.setNull(int, int, String) is called. The javadoc says that
PreparedStatement.setNull(int, int) checks type compatibility on embedded, but
not on the client
Key: DERBY-1494
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1494
Project:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-802?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-802:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
OutofMemory Error when reading large blob when statement type is
ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1494?page=comments#action_12420005 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1494:
---
Although both implementations of setNull(int,int) are compliant, I think it
would make more sense to change the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-989:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thank you for looking at the patch, Bryan! Committed 'derby-989-javadoc.diff'
into trunk with
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 420328/2006-07-09 19:46:20 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
NA NA NANA SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1352?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen reassigned DERBY-1352:
---
Assign To: Andreas Korneliussen
sysinfo tests should filter out locale information so that it can be run
successfully on locales that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1352?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1352:
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
sysinfo tests should filter out locale information so that it can be run
successfully on locales that are not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420027 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1330:
---
I have seen this regression test failure a couple of times lately. Could it be
related to this issue?
* Diff
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1477?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen closed DERBY-1477:
---
create JUnit tests for testing BLOB OutOfMemory problems
Key: DERBY-1477
Okay, for the impatient first, here is how to add a service to derby.
We'll code a new service called HelloService for Derby. The steps you
need to follow are:
Step 1: First, code the interface for your service. This is the
interface that Derby will use to locate your service and other modules
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1417?page=comments#action_12420034 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1417:
---
derby-1417-2a-rstest-refactor.diff looks good. Committed revision 420497.
Add new, lengthless overloads to the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1476?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1476:
--
Attachment: derby-1476-v1.diff
derby-1476-v1.stat
derby-1476-v1.diff adds a call to checkForSupportedDataType() in setNull(). It
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1476?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1476:
--
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
PreparedStatement.setNull(int,int) should throw
SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for unsupported types
Hello Kathey.
Using the org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDriver driver to access the
Derby database through network, sending a large amount of parameter
data with setBinaryStream will cause Network Server to throw an
OutOfMemoryException.
I'm not sure why you used the words sending a large
Hello Andreas.
I have some question for your comment
Reading beggining part, I take your reported phenomena as problem when
scrollable resultset is used.
However,reading last part, I found your report tells that problem was
found also when forward-only resultset was used.
I feel some
Or .
Did you use words sending a large amount of as just a meaning of
when Network Server receives a large amount of data ?
Excuse me for the difficulty of comprehension ...
Best regards.
TomohitoNakayama wrote:
Hello Kathey.
Using the org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDriver driver to
TomohitoNakayama wrote:
Hello Andreas.
I have some question for your comment
Reading beggining part, I take your reported phenomena as problem when
scrollable resultset is used.
However,reading last part, I found your report tells that problem was
found also when forward-only resultset
Hello Andreas.
I see ...
H mm. Complex circumstances
The program failed in creating error message of OutOfMemoryError ...
Please upload your application program.
I want to make it possible to see the phenomena by myself.
Best regards.
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
TomohitoNakayama
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1352?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen resolved DERBY-1352:
-
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed revision 420522.
sysinfo tests
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1142?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner reassigned DERBY-1142:
Assign To: Daniel John Debrunner
Metadata calls leak memory
--
Key: DERBY-1142
URL:
Kathey Marsden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know of an easy built in Java mechanism for Locale
sensitive matching?
I continue to work with a user trying to develop a strategy for
language based string type handling in Derby 10.1.
The ordering seems doable with the approach in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1142?page=comments#action_12420085 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1142:
--
An addition to the subset of changes of DERBY-827 fixed the issue, increasing
the number of iterations from
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1274?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno updated DERBY-1274:
-
Attachment: derby-1274v2.diff
The attached patch (derby-1274v2.diff) changes the Network Server so that it
will shutdown the databases it has booted
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1351?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1351:
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Committed revision 420535 on trunk. Patch still available for 10.1 branch.
lang/forupdate.sql fails with derbyclient in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1142?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1142:
-
Attachment: 1142_close_single_use_activations_draft.txt
Draft patch that closes an EmbedResultSet's single use activation when the
result
TomohitoNakayama wrote:
Hello Andreas.
I see ...
H mm. Complex circumstances
The program failed in creating error message of OutOfMemoryError ...
Please upload your application program.
I want to make it possible to see the phenomena by myself.
Best regards.
Hi,
Yes I will upload the
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 420501/2006-07-10 13:53:08 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1675674 2 119.92% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-550?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-550:
---
Attachment: BlobOutOfMem.java
Attached is a repro.
BLOB : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError with network JDBC driver
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-550?page=comments#action_12419714
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-550:
-
I intended to resolve this issue as
Hi Bryan,
My $0.02 follows. Cheers-Rick
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
...
a) RESTRICT processing should consider an index on a column to be
a dependent object and fail the DROP COLUMN if the column is used
in an index?
The ANSI spec doesn't provide much guidance here since ANSI doesn't talk
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12420111 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1459:
--
I'm beginning to run a battery of derbyalls against this patch using various
VMs with and without jar files. So far derbyall runs
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-551?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-551:
---
Attachment: derby-551-draft3.diff
derby-551-draft3.status
Attaching a new draft patch derby-551-draft3.diff which uses Dan's first
suggestion
Hello.
Would it be possible, to create a server side InputStream which requests bytes
from the client on demand, and that on the server side we could use
ps.setBinaryStream(..) instead of ps.setBytes(..) ?
The server would then stream the bytes when doing ps.execute(). Would this
work if
Hi Kristian,
Sorry for the late reply. I noticed that my code had some problems that wouldn't
allow me to run unit tests. Hopefully, all bugs are fixed now.
You were correct. JUnit was the problem and now the compile time errors are
gone. I think I may be running the test incorrectly. I have
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-551?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-551:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Allow invoking java stored procedures from inside a trigger. Make CALL a
valid statement in the trigger body.
Hi,
I'm using the new release of Derby, version 10.1.3 (see my sysinfo output below)
and I was testing to see if DERBY-85 was fixed, which according to the release
notes is included in 10.1.3. DERBY-85 is fixed, but the problem I am running
into,
which I thought was DERBY-85 is actually the
TomohitoNakayama wrote:
I think it is needed to find where excessive expanding code exists
I agree and think a good step toward that is to make sure there are
separate cases filed with reproducible cases for the issues that show
different symptoms. I am getting a little
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420121 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Knut, the diffs you are noticing is in one of the new tests that I added to
grantRevokeDDL.sql
The diff is for following
I would like the community's advice on whether the following Derby
behavior is a bug and, if so, whether we would be allowed to change this
behavior for 10.2:
A) Currently, Derby knows how to automatically generate values for
columns of type SMALLINT, INT, and BIGINT. You get this behavior if
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1486?page=comments#action_12420129 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-1486:
I posted a mail to derby-dev earlier, here is the link.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12420134 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1459:
---
Thanks so much Rick for looking this issue and to Olav for bringing it to the
attention of the community.
I just wanted to
On 7/10/06, Gokul Soundararajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kristian,
Sorry for the late reply. I noticed that my code had some problems that wouldn't
allow me to run unit tests. Hopefully, all bugs are fixed now.
You were correct. JUnit was the problem and now the compile time errors are
Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA) wrote:
Is this a Java behavior that you can count on the order in which items will be added and retrieved from HashMap?
At this point, I am not sure, how to make sure that items get added and
retrieved in the same order from the HashMap so that we will have
On 7/10/06, Myrna van Lunteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gokul,
The test harness spawns off further java processes which may not
inherit the classpath if you use -cp. Please see what you get when you
add the classes dir, junit.jar and jakarta jar to an environment
variable, then run the test.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-571?page=comments#action_12420139 ]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-571:
-
Intending to open a documentation sub-task on this - no open issue found
regarding docuementing the diagnostic tables of SYSCS_DIAG.
Gokul Soundararajan wrote:
Hi Kristian,
Sorry for the late reply. I noticed that my code had some problems that wouldn't
allow me to run unit tests. Hopefully, all bugs are fixed now.
You were correct. JUnit was the problem and now the compile time errors are
gone. I think I may be running the
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 7/10/06, Myrna van Lunteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gokul,
The test harness spawns off further java processes which may not
inherit the classpath if you use -cp. Please see what you get when you
add the classes dir, junit.jar and jakarta jar to an environment
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420145 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Mike responded following on the mailing list
quote
I do not believe you can count on the order of a HashMap, different
JVM's
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12420146 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1459:
--
Hi Kathey,
Here are some answers to your questions. And don't forget to thank Knut Anders,
who suggested this approach!
1) This
To me this is a problematic issue as i would expect the return type for
the keys to match the datatype of the column.
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I would like the community's advice on whether the following Derby
behavior is a bug and, if so, whether we would be allowed to change
this behavior for
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Before filing a bug on this, I'd like the community's advice:
1) Is this a bug? Should Statement.getGeneratedKeys() return a
ResultSet whose column has the same type as the underyling
autogenerated column?
2) If this is a bug, is it permitted to change this behavior in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12420154 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1459:
---
Rick said:
And don't forget to thank Knut Anders, who suggested this approach
Yes. Thanks Knut Anders!
I do not anticipate any
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1015?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1015:
---
Attachment: Derby1015.p2.diff.txt
derby1015.p2.stat.txt
I am attaching a phase 2 patch ( derby1015.p2.diff.txt,
Kathey Marsden wrote:
TomohitoNakayama wrote:
I think it is needed to find where excessive expanding code exists
I agree and think a good step toward that is to make sure there are
separate cases filed with reproducible cases for the issues that show
different symptoms. I am
I would appreciate if someone can look at the following comment and
share their thoughts:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1261#action_12418666
I would like to understand the correct behaviour in the above scenario
before adding it as a test case for DERBY-551.
Thanks,
Deepa
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1015?page=comments#action_12420160 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-1015:
Please note, there are two pending patches waiting for review.
derby1015.diff.txt, derby1015.p2.diff.txt.
These two
Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12420145 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Mike responded following on the mailing list
quote
I do not believe you can count on the
Hi Kathey,
My gut feeling is that changing this behavior could affect applications
like ij which make formatting decisions based on the JDBC types of
returned columns.
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Before filing a bug on this, I'd like the community's advice:
1) Is this a
I would like to remove the fix version (10.1.2.3) from one of the
issues (DERBY-1005) as the full fix for it did not get into 10.1.2.3.
But when I try to edit the issue, I see that 10.1.2.3 is showing up as
an archived fix version and I do not see an option to remove it. Does
anyone know how this
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Kathey,
My gut feeling is that changing this behavior could affect
applications like ij which make formatting decisions based on the JDBC
types of returned columns.
I agree, but I am not sure yet how significant that impact might be. I'd
like translate it into
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Kathey,
My gut feeling is that changing this behavior could affect
applications like ij which make formatting decisions based on the
JDBC types of returned columns.
If you return the correct column type of the base type, then the
formatting
Attempt to modify an identity column error after resetting identity column
--
Key: DERBY-1495
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1495
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Components: SQL
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Before filing a bug on this, I'd like the community's advice:
1) Is this a bug? Should Statement.getGeneratedKeys() return a
ResultSet whose column has the same type as the underyling
autogenerated column?
2) If this is a
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Certainly there are these changes for the ResultSet returned by
getGeneratedKeys():
o getMetaData() would correspond to the ResultSetMetadata of the
base table column and so will have different types, columnwidths
Hi,
I wondered if anyone got a chance to go over my earlier mail and if they think of an alternative way to solve the problem than the one suggested by me. If I don't hear anything in a day or so, then I will go ahead and changeSYSTABLEPERMS to look like SYSCOlPERMS. After that change, I will be
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Before filing a bug on this, I'd like the community's advice:
1) Is this a bug? Should Statement.getGeneratedKeys() return a
ResultSet whose column has the same type as the
Is Derby, JavaDB or something else the JDBC reference implementation
these days?
Mamta Satoor wrote:
[example snipped]
revoke select on t1 from user2
-- at this point, only view user2.v1 should get dropped because it depends
on the SELECTPRIV on t1. But dependency manager has no way to know that
user2.v1 needs only SELECTPRIV and hence only object affected by this
testSecMec fails with jcc2.8 with 131 jvms
--
Key: DERBY-1496
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1496
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
Components: Test
Versions: 10.2.0.0
Reporter: Sunitha
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
This would help customers who want to get the type of a table's
generated key from getGeneratedKeys() itself and not have to extract
this information from a more complicated series of metadata calls.
I'm lost
That is on my todo list to figure out when I do the revoke privilege implementation. But I am thinking that when a revoke privilege is processed, before dropping the dependent objects, a check will be made to see if some other privilege can replace the privilege being revoked and if so, then make
These seem reasonable. On the other hand, using getGeneratedKeys() to
determine the type name of a table's generated key seems very very
unlikely to me. It would require that the application/tool can insert a
row of the correct shape, if the app/tool can do that, then it probably
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Certainly there are these changes for the ResultSet returned by
getGeneratedKeys():
o getMetaData() would correspond to the
On 7/10/06, Deepa Remesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to remove the fix version (10.1.2.3) from one of the
issues (DERBY-1005) as the full fix for it did not get into 10.1.2.3.
But when I try to edit the issue, I see that 10.1.2.3 is showing up as
an archived fix version and I do not
Have you considered using PROVIDERFINDER that is part of dependency system? TableDescriptor, for example, stores column list that a view depends on using ColumnsInTable finder. A similar mechanism might work for TablePermDescriptor.
SatheeshOn 7/10/06, Mamta Satoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
Mamta Satoor wrote:
That is on my todo list to figure out when I do the revoke privilege
implementation. But I am thinking that when a revoke privilege is
processed,
before dropping the dependent objects, a check will be made to see if some
other privilege can replace the privilege being
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1486?page=comments#action_12420190 ]
David Heath commented on DERBY-1486:
I have taken a look at the JDBC 3.0 specification and also the JavaDoc and
noticed they did not quite agree on when an auto-commit
After reading you mail, it seems like with revoke, I can send specific action type to dependent objects ie say REVOKE_SELECT_PRIVILEGE / REVOKE_UPDATE_PRIVILEGE/ REVOKE_REFERENCES_PRIVILEGE etc rather than generic REVOKE_PRIVILEGE and that way dependent objects can see if they depend on that
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 420656/2006-07-11 01:12:32 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1675674 2 121.86% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
Rick Hillegas wrote:
1) Is this a bug? Should Statement.getGeneratedKeys() return a
ResultSet whose column has the same type as the underyling
autogenerated column?
Reading from the JDBC 3.0 and JDBC 4.0 spec it seems clear to me that
we are not compliant and if non-compliance is a bug,
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
1) Is this a bug? Should Statement.getGeneratedKeys() return a
ResultSet whose column has the same type as the underyling
autogenerated column?
Reading from the JDBC 3.0 and JDBC 4.0 spec it seems clear to me that
we are not compliant and if
88 matches
Mail list logo