[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1708?page=all ]
Yip Ng reassigned DERBY-1708:
-
Assignee: Yip Ng
Unprivileged user can perform lock table statement on a table which he/she
does not have any access rights
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1651?page=comments#action_12429249 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-1651:
--
Some general comments:
1) I think a design document to explain what each class does and how they
interact
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 432935/2006-08-20 06:43:01 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1671670 2 146.92% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1708?page=all ]
Yip Ng updated DERBY-1708:
--
Attachment: derby1708-10.2-stat01.txt
derby1708-10.2-diff01.txt
Attaching patch for DERBY-1708 for 10.2. The problem is that the lock table
statement is
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 432847/2006-08-19 19:46:02 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
3715712 0 108.94% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429256 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1610:
---
Hi Tomohito,
The BatchUpdateException indicates that the error happens when executeBatch()
is invoked, not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429259 ]
Mayuresh Nirhali commented on DERBY-418:
I tried modifying the finalize method of embedResultSet to close
singleuseActivation and that seems to have worked
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1142?page=comments#action_12429260 ]
Mayuresh Nirhali commented on DERBY-1142:
-
If the singleUseActivation is closed in the finalize method of EmdebResultSet
then the memory leak is not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429263 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
The mystery was the reason why test of setNull generats different error message
than not null method in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-418?page=comments#action_12429264 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-418:
-
Closing the activation directly in the finalize method will lead to problems.
The close of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429265 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
I think release note should be prepared for this issue,
including difference originally introduced in
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (21 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-1651 Develop a mechanism to migrate mySQL databases to Derby. Migration
tool should include both schema and data migration options.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1610:
--
Derby Info: [Release Note Needed]
Adding the Release Note Needed flag to keep it on the release manager's radar.
Updating column typed as CHAR to
Oh. I see ...
Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1610:
--
Derby Info: [Release Note Needed]
Adding the Release Note Needed flag to keep it on the release
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1708?page=all ]
Yip Ng updated DERBY-1708:
--
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Unprivileged user can perform lock table statement on a table which he/she
does not have any access rights
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429278 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1610:
---
With the DERBY-1610_2.diff patch, setBinaryStream(null), setBlob(null) and
setNull(Types.BLOB) throw
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1582?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1582:
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
With v2 patch, derbyall ran with no new failures. But the test additions
conflict with changes in DERBY-1538.
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 432972/2006-08-20 16:52:25 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1671670 2 147.65% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12429286 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
--
Technically, I think we can make the calcJdbcTypeForNullValue() *more
complete*.
However, I'm not sure we
Simplify building of SystemColumn array in CatalogRowFactory implementations.
--
Key: DERBY-1734
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1734
Project: Derby
Hi all,
I'm a student working on improving the CacheManager in Derby as part
of Google's Summer of Code. Over the summer, I have looked at two ways
of improving it. In my first approach, I implemented the ClockPro
algorithm. In my second approach, I tried to separate the cache
implementation
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-766?page=comments#action_12429307 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-766:
-
Issue now fixed, with sufficient memory seen over 6000 unions supported in
largeCodeGen test.
DERBY-1315
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-766?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-766.
-
Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Changes merged to the 10.2 branch (current version is 10.2.1.0)
Improve code generation to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-216?page=comments#action_12429314 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-216:
-
The insert case is included in largeCodeGen now.
expand largeCodeGen.java test
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-176?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-176.
-
Fix Version/s: 10.2.1.0
10.3.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Changes for DERBY-766 and under this bug ensured that a Query too
Large number of rows in a VALUES clause (e.g. for an INSERT) can result in a
StackOverflowError
---
Key: DERBY-1735
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1735
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1315?page=comments#action_12429317 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1315:
--
To see this problem with largeCodeGen one must increase the number of union
clauses created in the
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 433085/2006-08-21 01:22:24 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
2672670 2 154.08% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
On 8/20/06, Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA) derby-dev@db.apache.org wrote:
3) Looks like the code uses generics, which limit the use to JDK 1.5 platforms.
While this may be ok, need to document need for JDK 1.5 platform and raise
appropriate message if used in earlier platforms. Most of derby can
29 matches
Mail list logo