[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371533 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1097:
-
Rick, I think you need to recompile everything, since you get
java.lang.AbstractMethodError. I think there is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371535 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-1097:
-
Actually, I think isClosed() is introduced in JDBC 4, and EmbedStatement is
compiled against the rt of jdk 1.3 or
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371394 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1097:
I tried it in my environment, and it worked by simply adding the line
jdbc4/StatementTest.junit to the jdbc40.runall file.
If
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371372 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097:
--
I'm afraid I don't know how to wire this test into the jdbc40 suite. I tried
wiring
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371474 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097:
--
Now when I add jdbc/StatementTest.junit to the end of jdbc40.runall, I get the
following diffs in the network and embedded runs:
How come you can get to JIRA and I can't? Hmph.
Anyway, the reason you are getting this is because the functionality
Statement.isClosed() is not yet implemented (that's the patch I am
trying to commit once I get access to JIRA).
David
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
[
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371481 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1097:
OK, I can get into JIRA again. I'll add this to the jdbc4 test suite as a
junit test, and commit it along with the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371364 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1097:
Hi, Kristian. Sorry to bounce this back, but Rick's latest jdbc40 test suite
checkin has thrown a spanner in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371366 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097:
--
I think that my rototill doesn't affect Kristian's patch. He has written a
JUnit test which uses conventional machinery to get a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371372 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097:
--
I'm afraid I don't know how to wire this test into the jdbc40 suite. I tried
wiring StatementTest.junit at the end of the jdbc40
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12370883 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1097:
--
Hi Kristian,
1) I'm afraid I'm missing some context here. It looks like you have some idea
of how
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12371051 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1097:
Answering Rick's comments of 17th of March.
1) As is already stated, this test can be run from any suite by simply adding
it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1097?page=comments#action_12370910 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1097:
There is a jdbc4 suite. You can add any JUnit test to a suite using the .junit
extension (e.g. StatementTest.junit).
13 matches
Mail list logo