[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505091
]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1377:
---
To be explicit:
the following file-extensions indicate files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505097
]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1377:
---
to continue:
.multi is data input
.tests is data input
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505283
]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
Myrna asked:
Do we need to do a similar exercise for the 10.2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12443967 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
It might work a little better with a semi-colon as the last element in the
licence_header file.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12443969 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
That's a good improvement, it would allow for only one header file with the
script. As it was, I just sedded out
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12433247 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
What about the SQL scripts in the tests? Are we now passing on those? I had
thought that we had decided that they
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426982 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-1377:
--
I need to recheck the patch for tests/lang (I see errors), so please do not
commit it. I will upload
a corrected
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427001 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
If the determination is that we have to include the header in the .sql files,
since they qualify as creative
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427012 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Actually, the deadline has been pushed back to:
+1
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote On 08/09/06 12:25,:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427012 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Actually, the deadline has been pushed back to:
On 8/9/06, David Van Couvering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
ok, I'll take care of updating the java files in functionTests/tests
and then move this out to 10.2.2.
andrew
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427012
]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Actually, the deadline has been pushed back to:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427025 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Well, it's Cliff's deadline, and he said: I think November 1 seems pretty
reasonable since that will be more than
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427028 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Committed revision 430143 which fixes the remaining java files in
functionTests. The only remaining work for this
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
The only remaining work for this issue is coming up for a
solution to adding the license header to the .sql test files
in o.a.dT.fT.tests (and possibly their associated master
files as well).
Looks like java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/SqlXmlUtil.java
On 8/9/06, Army [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/SqlXmlUtil.java slipped
through the cracks, probably because it was added as part of a DERBY-688 commit
right in the middle of the DERBY-1377 effort yesterday.
find java -name *.java -print | xargs
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12427047 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
I believe with my last checkin that the entire source tree is completed, except
for the .sql files. The
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426643 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Now that I've got some experience with these tools, I'll start knocking off the
files in the code tree, starting
Great! IMHO, if anyone feels something is creative work, it should have
the header, so thanks for nailing the message files as well.
David
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426643 ]
Andrew McIntyre
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426679 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled license headers under java/shared/org/apache/derby/shared/ in
subversion revisions:
429768
429771
429781
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426688 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled tree under java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/jdbc/ at subversion
revision 429791. Added license header to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426697 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled tree under java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/services/ at subversion
revision 429794.
Update copyright
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426703 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled tree under java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/store/ at subversion
revision 429802.
Update copyright
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426711 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Committed java/drda changes with revision 429803, java/client changes with
429795.
Update copyright headers to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426712 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled tree under java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/services/ at subversion
revision 429811.
Update copyright
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426716 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
Committed plugins changes with revision 429773.
Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426719 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled tree under java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/store/ at subversion
revision 429816.
Update copyright
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426732 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Rototilled trees under java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/db/ and
java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/io/ at subversion
I wouldn't mind the delay. Let us know what answer comes around on this
one.
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425969 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12426294 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
The question on legal-discuss
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425870 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Dan, I just noticed this patch you added. Is this something for review only,
or do you want me to commit
OK. From my perspective it looks good, pretty basic switch.
David
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425877 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425893 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Does our generated javadoc need to have license headers? My intuition is yes,
but looking for others
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425895 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
I would say no to the generated javadoc, they are not source files.
Though maybe the copyright
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425896 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Progress being tracked (and hopefully coordination being managed) through this
Wiki page:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425045 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Do we have any conclusion about how we should take care of this? I'm thinking
of unassigning myself from
We are about 3 weeks away from generating a release candidate which must
conform to a new, murky policy. These options occur to me:
1) Generate a release which follows the old policy. I would imagine that
the DB PMC would feel bound to reject such a release.
2) Wait for the policy to sort
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422723 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
From the FAQ at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
With few exceptions, all human-readable
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422725 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
The COPYRIGHT file in our root directory contains copyrights for IBM. Does
anyone know if this needs to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422727 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
I think the IBM copyright belongs in the NOTICE file --
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422760 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
Not to complicate things, but there was a big round-about with this in the
early days of Derby.
The 'resolution'
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422762 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
This FAQ in http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html is relevant to
Andrew's comment:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422764 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
The current headers have ASF copyright notices, e.g.:
Copyright 1997, 2004 The Apache Software Foundation or its
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422770 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
Depends on what the defintion of an ASF copyright notice is.
Could be:
A) A copyright notice
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422776 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1377:
B) A copyright notice statement where the copyright is actually held by the
Apache Software Foundation
Since the
I have to say I don't understand where we stand at this point. If
anybody can give me a recipe of what I should be doing I would
appreciate it...
David
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12422783 ]
David Van Couvering wrote:
I have to say I don't understand where we stand at this point. If
anybody can give me a recipe of what I should be doing I would
appreciate it...
I suggest you hold off doing anything yet, and give this time to sort out.
-jean
David
Daniel John Debrunner
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12421647 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
The policy is now posted at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
Update copyright headers to comply
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12420707 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
Minor note: due date moved from 1-August- 2006 to 1-September-2006; see
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12415893 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
So far, it look like this will be required in all source, but the final notice
has not been emailed yet, so this is just an
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12415894 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-1377:
-
Nothing is required for web site pages (at least not yet):
51 matches
Mail list logo
