[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12419718 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-989:
---
Javadoc looks great; thanks for following up on this. I feel that fixing the
test and fixing the javadoc in this way is a good
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12419434 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-989:
--
Thanks for your comments, Suresh! I think I will just fix the test for now
since it doesn't seem like the current
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12419437 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-989:
--
Committed derby-989-timebomb.diff and derby-989-testfix.diff into trunk with
revision 419479.
I will also update the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12419356 ]
Suresh Thalamati commented on DERBY-989:
Hi Knut,
Thanks for looking into this failure. I took a quick look at your changes,patch
looks good.
Only minor thing I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12419079 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-989:
I have reviewed the code in the patch (derby-989-v1.diff) and would recommend
it being committed.
I think it is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12419163 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-989:
--
Thank you Andreas and Bryan for reviewing the patch.
Bryan wrote:
1) I don't really see why unsubscribe needs to block
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12418941 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-989:
--
I have a hypothesis, but it's hard to verify since the failure is
intermittent and the test needs much time to finish.
I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12374642 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-989:
--
I see a failure for this test with 10.2.0.0 alpha - (394001) on IBM 1.4.2
I don't see ran out of time. Is this the same failure or
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-989?page=comments#action_12370593 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-989:
---
Similar diff and test failure also seen during our nightly testruns on
2006-03-14 on ibm142/10.1 codeline, insane jars