Hello, I would like to understand when and why is it useful to prefer the DB2UDB jdbc driver instead DerbyClient to access a DERBY NETWORK SERVER?
Performance reasons or jdbc version implementation? Thanks for attention, bye -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-and-why-use-DB2UDB-jdbc-driver-instead-of-the-Derby-ClientDriver-to-access-a-DERBY-NETWORK-SERVER--tp18669150p18669150.html Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
