On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 23:57, Michael Segel wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 4:46 pm, Susan Cline wrote:
If you're looking at localhost, then try the IP address of 127.0.0.1
This is a long shot, but maybe your somehow bitten by the IPv6
preference in the JVM that affects some Linux
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 10:20 -0700, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
The changes Knut pointed out have been merged to 10.1. If you can build
the 10.1 branch and try them out that would be great, otherwise you
could wait for a snapshot and try that out.
Daniel,
the version on the 10.1 branch
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 09:18 -0700, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Andreas Fredriksson wrote:
Thanks for the patch, it may provide the correct approach but from a
quick look the patch has some incorrect synchronization.
For example, this extract.
+ synchronized
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:39 -0700, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
I'm more talking from a functional level. Even with the synchronization
the caller of the method is just seeing a value from the past, no
guarantees over it being the latest once the method returns. As soon
as the synchronization
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:23 -0700, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Replying to myself here because I got curious of wheter a testcase would
reproduce the problem, so I wrote one.
Wow, very cool!
Maybe next step would be you fixing the bug! ;-)
It's amazing how much fun it can be to
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 08:51 +0200, Andreas Fredriksson wrote:
I think the only fix is to rewrite the class definition code in Derby to
avoid taking a lock on the helper objects, but I don't know the source
code well enough to write a proper fix.
Maybe I should spend more time tweaking before
Hey list,
we've re-targeted our system to Derby and now we're seeing some class
loading-related deadlocks.
To give some background, our system loads code from the database and
other various sources (through our own set of class loaders). This has
worked fine with Oracle, MS SQL Server and many
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 06:52 -0700, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
I working in Derby's classloader area at the moment, so I'll look into
this, do you have a simple reproducible case?
Hi Daniel,
I don't think it's easily reproducible without breaking some rules.
Here's an idea for a testcase
