On 03/04/2013 04:11, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
it's worth reporting the problem,
together with whatever information you have.
OK, I'll prepare something and submit it.
2) I agree with Knut Anders's hunch that this seems like
a sort avoidance bug.
Yes, that sounds right to me too.
3) I see
On 02/04/2013 22:13, Mike Matrigali wrote:
need ddl for both item_usage (i think you posted this in 1st posting) and tests
(don't see this one) tables, to read the query plan.
ITEM_USAGE is indeed in the first post. Here is the TESTS table:
CREATE TABLE tests (
id INTEGER
On 03/04/2013 04:11, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
it's worth reporting the problem,
together with whatever information you have.
I've submitted what I have reported so far as:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6148
I'm still trying to come up with a suitable test case and will add it to
