On 20/06/2012 15:25, Kristian Waagan wrote:
Logged as DERBY-5823 [1].
The bug is data dependent in that it requires a certain number of rows
to be inserted, so that may be what's causing your repro to fail
triggering the bug.
OK, many thanks.
--
John English
On 19.06.2012 09:45, John English wrote:
On 05/06/2012 18:45, Dag H. Wanvik wrote:
Looks like a bug to me. The error XSCH4 Conglomerate could not be
created isn't being tested for in the Derby tests as far as I can
see. I also searched the bug tracker
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
On 20.06.2012 13:05, John English wrote:
On 20/06/2012 11:45, Kristian Waagan wrote:
Hi John,
I believe your assumptions are correct.
This is a bug in Derby where the temporary row holder, used to hold
generated keys, overflows and a temporary backing conglomerate is
attempted created with a
On 05/06/2012 18:45, Dag H. Wanvik wrote:
Looks like a bug to me. The error XSCH4 Conglomerate could not be
created isn't being tested for in the Derby tests as far as I can
see. I also searched the bug tracker
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY) in vain for this
particular error
John English john.fore...@gmail.com writes:
dbInsert lines 1056/1057 look like this:
stat.executeUpdate();
ResultSet r = stat.getGeneratedKeys();
so the failure happens when the prepared statement is executed, just
before the call to getGeneratedKeys().
I tried this sample, but saw no
On 05/06/2012 18:45, Dag H. Wanvik wrote:
Looks like a bug to me. The error XSCH4 Conglomerate could not be
created isn't being tested for in the Derby tests as far as I can
see. I also searched the bug tracker
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY) in vain for this
particular error
resource_usage WHERE itemid=? AND itemtype=?))
Query parameters: 1='24' 2='final' 3='18' 4='temp' 5='24' 6='final'):
Here's the resulting stack trace from the point just before I rethrow:
java.sql.SQLException: Conglomerate could not be created.
at
org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40
Looks like a bug to me. The error XSCH4 Conglomerate could not be
created isn't being tested for in the Derby tests as far as I can
see. I also searched the bug tracker
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY) in vain for this
particular error.
Looking in the code where the error
On 6/2/12 3:18 AM, John English wrote:
On 01/06/2012 15:19, John English wrote:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage
WHERE itemid
On 04.06.12 14:52, Rick Hillegas wrote:
On 6/2/12 3:18 AM, John English wrote:
On 01/06/2012 15:19, John English wrote:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid
On 04/06/2012 16:35, Kristian Waagan wrote:
On 04.06.12 14:52, Rick Hillegas wrote:
On 6/2/12 3:18 AM, John English wrote:
On 01/06/2012 15:19, John English wrote:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could
not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT
On 6/4/2012 9:29 AM, John English wrote:
I'm on 10.8, and I only have about a dozen matching rows at the
moment. No stack trace that goes further than my own code; all I have
is stuff like this:
Check the derby.log for the error and full stack trace. If the derby.log
doesn't show the error,
On 01/06/2012 16:36, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
John Englishcheckpoint...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM
On 01/06/2012 15:19, John English wrote:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage
WHERE itemid=?
AND itemtype
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage
WHERE itemid=?
AND itemtype=?
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT resid FROM
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:19 +0300, John English wrote:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage
WHERE itemid
John English checkpoint...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having trouble with the following error: Conglomerate could not be
created. It happens when I do this:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage
WHERE itemid=?
AND itemtype
On 01/06/2012 16:36, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Does the insert statement work if you rewrite it to
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,itemid,itemtype)
(SELECT resid, CAST(? AS INT), CAST(? AS VARCHAR(32672))
FROM resource_usage
WHERE itemid=?
AND itemtype=?
AND
Can anyone explain what this means? It occurs when I issue what should
be a straightforward insert:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,xmlid,xmltable)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage WHERE xmlid=? AND xmltable=?)
The select returns 64 results, but the ibsert fails.
John English j...@brighton.ac.uk writes:
Can anyone explain what this means? It occurs when I issue what should
be a straightforward insert:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,xmlid,xmltable)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage WHERE xmlid=? AND xmltable=?)
I think we had a similar
On 12/07/2010 12:15 PM, John English wrote:
Can anyone explain what this means? It occurs when I issue what should
be a straightforward insert:
INSERT INTO resource_usage (resid,xmlid,xmltable)
(SELECT resid,?,? FROM resource_usage WHERE xmlid=? AND xmltable=?)
The select returns 64 results,
21 matches
Mail list logo
