Re: [Bug 502136] Re: Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor

2010-07-13 Thread Jens Ropers
On 13 July 2010 21:15, Kamus kamu...@gmail.com wrote: Since this report have a long time without activity please could you check if this issue is still occuring under latest release of alacarte included in Ubuntu Lucid? Seriously? *Seriously?* You had to ask me for that? You couldn't just

[Bug 502136] [NEW] Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor

2010-01-01 Thread Jens Ropers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: alacarte In the alacarte menu editor, some items cannot be moved into new menus (folders). PROBLEM: Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Right click on the Ubuntu logo .. Applications .. Places .. System area in gnome-panel. 2. Select Edit Menus. This

[Bug 502136] Re: Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor

2010-01-01 Thread Jens Ropers
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37345942/Dependencies.txt -- Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 502136] Re: Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor

2010-01-01 Thread Jens Ropers
Alright, so I just booted off the 9.10 live CD, and I can confirm the exact same behaviour under Ubuntu 9.10, with alacarte version 0.12.4-0ubuntu2. -- Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502136 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 502136] Re: Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor

2010-01-01 Thread Jens Ropers
...and what's worse, the default installation of Ubuntu even includes CD/DVD Creator, trying to move which triggers this bug, in Applications -- Accessories. Eat that, overeager premature Ubuntu bug closers! -- Cannot move some items into new menus in alacarte menu editor

[Bug 176475] Empty Trash does not empty ~/.local/share/Trash

2007-12-14 Thread Jens Ropers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome Currently, some Ubuntu/Linux applications move items to ~/.Trash/ when deleting files, while other programs move the data to ~/.local/share/Trash/ . ~/.local/share/Trash/ seems to be the newer location, apparently it's recommended by the XDG Base

[Bug 156060] Re: Rhythmbox not display graphics if click on visualization and select a GOOM (Intermitent bug)

2007-11-24 Thread Jens Ropers
I'm having the same problem. Maybe this will clarify things a bit: The problem is that in a Rhythmbox installation in Ubuntu 7.10, the GOOM visualization plugin does not work -- when visualization is active and GOOM is selected, Rhythmbox can even seize up and almost freeze. Sometimes even the

[Bug 156060] Re: Rhythmbox not display graphics if click on visualization and select a GOOM (Intermitent bug)

2007-11-24 Thread Jens Ropers
PPS: While GOOM now works, there still is a significant delay upon activating a GOOM visalization. The music playback may even stop for a while. This is on an Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz PC with 2 GB RAM, so this probably should not happen. -- Rhythmbox not display graphics if click on visualization

[Bug 156060] Re: Rhythmbox not display graphics if click on visualization and select a GOOM (Intermitent bug)

2007-11-24 Thread Jens Ropers
Maybe if the issue with the GOOM visualization cannot be fixed, then a good alternative would be to remove the GOOM entry from the Rhythmbox visualization menu. libvisual-0.4-plugins might be a good alternative. Upon installing this package (not installed by default), a number of nice and

[Bug 156060] Re: Rhythmbox not display graphics if click on visualization and select a GOOM (Intermitent bug)

2007-11-24 Thread Jens Ropers
PS: The OP mentioned Compitz. I don't think Compitz has anything to do with it; for what it's worth, I have it disabled and I'm having the same problem. I don't even think OpenGL is necessarily at fault -- OpenGL works on my system, and I can use demanding OpenGL applications such as Chromium

[Bug 92296] Re: [Feisty] Low quality of text rendering in Evince

2007-08-12 Thread Jens Ropers
I've previously posted the following info at bug 26118, but was advised that it's probably related to this bug, so I'm reposting things here: I'm also seeing absolutely atrocious font rendering with some PDF files in evince. gpdf renders the same PDFs much better, but appears to use different

[Bug 92296] Re: [Feisty] Low quality of text rendering in Evince

2007-08-12 Thread Jens Ropers
To add: I'm just noticing now that after upgrading to Ubuntu 7.04, the issue appears to be resolved for me -- I get decent PDF rendering in evince 0.8.1 now. If others can confirm this, then maybe this bug could be closed? -- [Feisty] Low quality of text rendering in Evince

[Bug 26118] Re: Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf

2007-08-12 Thread Jens Ropers
Thanks Peter. I've reposted my info there. -- Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 26118] Re: Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf

2007-04-18 Thread Jens Ropers
@Marciano Siniscalchi Thank you for your comment. Do you/does anyone know if there is another bug filed for that Type 3 fonts rendering issue? -- Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 26118] Re: Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf

2007-03-28 Thread Jens Ropers
I don't know if this is related, but I'm also seeing absolutely atrocious font rendering with some PDF files in evince. gpdf renders the same PDFs much better, but appears to use different fonts and ignore settings such as bold. Please see the following two screenshot for comparison. Yes, this

[Bug 26118] Re: Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf

2007-03-28 Thread Jens Ropers
** Attachment added: gPDF pdf screenshot http://librarian.launchpad.net/7035138/Screenshot.gpdf.png -- Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf https://launchpad.net/bugs/26118 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 26118] Re: Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf

2007-03-28 Thread Jens Ropers
This is the actual PDF file the above screenshots were taken with. ** Attachment added: PDF file that is rendered badly in evince (and gPDF is not too great either) http://librarian.launchpad.net/7035319/18280.pdf -- Bad rendering (hinting) in Evince and Xpdf

[Bug 94048] Re: [feisty] Slow gnome application startup due to /etc/hosts misconfiguration

2007-03-25 Thread Jens Ropers
This needs to be investigated by someone knowledgeable enough before it's committed. man hosts sudo vi /etc/hosts ji# ESC$bywk$a ESCp:x (DISCLAIMER: I'm a BSD guy. If this, for whatever weird and wonderful reason, breaks shit in Linux, don't blame me.) -- [feisty] Slow gnome application

[Bug 69515] Re: Movie Player (totem) crashes

2006-10-31 Thread Jens Ropers
** Attachment added: crash file http://librarian.launchpad.net/4941972/_usr_lib_totem_totem-mozilla-viewer.1000.crash -- Movie Player (totem) crashes https://launchpad.net/bugs/69515 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 69515] Movie Player (totem) crashes

2006-10-31 Thread Jens Ropers
Public bug reported: Movie Player (totem) crashes repeatedly. Not sure if I can get it to work with ANY movie after upgrading to Efty Eft. It worked under Dapper. ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Movie Player (totem) crashes