[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-11-07 Thread Joel Ebel
I can confirm that the new package does prevent settings in dconf from propagating into gconf on a dconf update after the package is installed and the user is logged out and back in. I haven't used the new package long enough to identify if there are any regressions, but it does seem to fix this

[Bug 963125] Re: Alt-Tab window switcher lost

2012-10-30 Thread Joel Ebel
** Also affects: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-30 Thread Joel Ebel
I added my comments to bug 963125 regarding the dconf array keybindings being converted to lists in gconf, where metacity expects strings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.

[Bug 963125] Re: Alt-Tab window switcher lost

2012-10-30 Thread Joel Ebel
Adding packages gnome-settings-daemon and gsettings-desktop-schemas, as a fix could be done in either. The issue appears to be that dconf stores the keybindings in arrays of strings, and when set there, gnome-settings-daemon will transition those settings to gconf as defined by

[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-29 Thread Joel Ebel
I'm pretty new to dconf, so I'm making some assumptions which may be incorrect. When dconf update is run as root, that only updates settings which are either mandatory or defaults system-wide. Neither of those changes should result in a change in the users home directory, and if a user wasn't

[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-29 Thread Joel Ebel
This also exposes something else, which might be better as a separate bug. wm-schemas.convert tries to convert metacity keybindings from dconf to gconf. Unfortunately the types are different, so anything accepted by dconf probably won't actually work once it's written to gconf. This was exposed

[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-26 Thread Joel Ebel
Under what conditions would the gconf plugin for gsettings daemon convert dconf settings into gconf? This is triggered by a dconf update while a user is logged in, which seems a rare use case under normal conditions. When is this plugin designed to operate normally, and could that other normal

[Bug 620693] Re: Screen not locked when turned off

2011-09-22 Thread Joel Ebel
Martin, this new package looks good on Lucid. I went through the testing procedure before the package, and the screen did not lock. After installing the new package, without changing settings, the screen did indeed lock. Michael, thanks for taking a look at this. -- You received this bug

[Bug 620693] Re: Screen not locked when turned off

2011-06-22 Thread Joel Ebel
I no longer work on the team responsible for maintaining this. I'll leave it and see if anyone on Goobuntu Team cares to test it or speak up. It may not be important to them anymore. However, this is really easy to reproduce, should you want to test it yourself. I just don't have anything

[Bug 660455] Re: clock-applet continually crashing

2010-12-03 Thread Joel Ebel
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660455 Title: clock-applet continually crashing --

[Bug 677296] [NEW] Smart copying with Ctrl-C no longer works

2010-11-18 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal As reported by one of our users... In Lucid, gnome-terminal doesn't support copying with smart Ctrl-C. This is a functionality regression. Hardy behavior: - have text selected with the mouse = CRTL-C is Copy - have no text selected with

[Bug 620693] Re: Screen not locked when turned off

2010-10-15 Thread Joel Ebel
The behavior is still the same in Maverick. The screen does not lock when the screen is blanked, even if lock/black_screen is checked, or lock/use_screensaver_settings is checked and screensaver lock is enabled. The gnome power manager manual also still has inaccurate information regarding when

[Bug 620693] [NEW] Screen not locked when turned off

2010-08-19 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager All settings I refer to here are gconf settings relative to /apps/gnome- power-manager unless fully qualified. If the value for timeout/sleep_display_ac (in seconds) is less than that of /desktop/gnome/session/idle_delay (in minutes)

[Bug 438520] Re: Right Alt key is always selected under key to choose 3rd level

2010-07-08 Thread Joel Ebel
This does appear to be a regression since bug 76901, as when console- setup gets installed by debootstrap, even with the USA layout and variant, /etc/default/console/setup is getting XKBOPTIONS=lv3:ralt_switch ** Also affects: console-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 438520] Re: Right Alt key is always selected under key to choose 3rd level

2010-07-08 Thread Joel Ebel
** Changed in: console-setup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Right Alt key is always selected under key to choose 3rd level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 312126] Re: Custom browser does not receive URL at %s

2010-07-07 Thread Joel Ebel
The preferred applications help page says to use %s. Perhaps this is just a documentation bug. I puzzled of this one for a while until I came to the same conclusion. -- Custom browser does not receive URL at %s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312126 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 579044] Re: Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In

2010-06-11 Thread Joel Ebel
The oem user gets removed at the end of the oem-config process. I'll have to do some checking to see if a specific option breaks it, but I notice that a standard (non-oem) install doesn't have the file at all, so it seems like the oem-config process should remove that file upon completion.

[Bug 579044] Re: Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In

2010-06-11 Thread Joel Ebel
It appears that the problem is in the TimedLogin feature. If you set TimedLoginEnable=true, you must also set a valid user in TimedLogin and a valid delay in TimedLoginDelay. If either of those is not set, or if the TimedLogin user is invalid, as was the case once oem was removed, then the

[Bug 579044] Re: Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In

2010-06-10 Thread Joel Ebel
After some more investigation, it turns out this is a problem only with oem installs. After an oem install, you are left with /etc/gdm/custom.conf with the following contents: [daemon] AutomaticLoginEnable=true AutomaticLogin=oem TimedLoginEnable=true TimedLogin=oem TimedLoginDelay=10 If I

[Bug 518810] Re: gdm monitors for $HOME/.face even when IncludeAll is false

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
The package in lucid-proposed breaks users who set disable_user_list to true. The result is that you still get a Log In button (which the changelog indicates shouldn't happen anymore) but when you click it, GDM crashes. Reverting to the version in Lucid main resolved the issue. -- gdm monitors

[Bug 398300] Re: The new gdm doesn't give an option to run /etc/X11/Xsession

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
The package in lucid-proposed breaks users who set disable_user_list to true. The result is that you still get a Log In button (which the changelog indicates shouldn't happen anymore) but when you click it, GDM crashes. Reverting to the version in Lucid main resolved the issue. -- The new gdm

[Bug 579044] Re: Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: regression-proposed -- Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579044 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 518810] Re: gdm monitors for $HOME/.face even when IncludeAll is false

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
See bug 579044 for details of the regression. ** Tags added: verification-failed -- gdm monitors for $HOME/.face even when IncludeAll is false https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in

[Bug 398300] Re: The new gdm doesn't give an option to run /etc/X11/Xsession

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
See bug 579044 for details of the regression. ** Tags added: verification-failed -- The new gdm doesn't give an option to run /etc/X11/Xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 579044] Re: Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
referenced in SRU bug 518810 and 398300 -- Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579044 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 579044] Re: Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In

2010-05-11 Thread Joel Ebel
just to make it a link: bug 398300 -- Setting disable_user_list to true causes gdm to crash on clicking Log In https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579044 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 463026] Re: User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled.

2010-05-04 Thread Joel Ebel
It looks like this bug has gone away. I don't know if it's fixed by upstream, but my bug report never got attention. -- User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 463029] Re: GDM without user list requires that you click Log In.

2010-05-04 Thread Joel Ebel
The other related launchpad bug I filed is gone in Lucid now, however, this bug, requiring that you click Log In before typing your username is still present. With the other bug being fixed, this is no longer as critical, but it's still a poor experience and in conflict with the login experience

[Bug 118800] Re: Passwords should not be required when creating accounts

2010-04-14 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid -- Passwords should not be required when creating accounts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 463029] Re: GDM without user list requires that you click Log In.

2010-02-26 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid -- GDM without user list requires that you click Log In. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 463026] Re: User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled.

2010-02-26 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid -- User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 363871] Re: Disabling user switching doesn't disable it completely

2010-02-26 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid -- Disabling user switching doesn't disable it completely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 463026] Re: User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled.

2009-10-29 Thread Joel Ebel
I filed this bug upstream as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600079 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #600079 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600079 -- User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463026 You

[Bug 463029] Re: GDM without user list requires that you click Log In.

2009-10-29 Thread Joel Ebel
This bug is already filed upstream, and has already been linked to this bug. I just wanted a launchpad bug open to track the upstream bug. -- GDM without user list requires that you click Log In. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463029 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 463026] [NEW] User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled.

2009-10-28 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm If the gdm user list (face browser) is enabled, then beginning to type a username locates the appropriate entry in the user list. If the user list is disabled, this search box serves no purpose and should be disabled. Since users are accustomed to

[Bug 463029] [NEW] GDM without user list requires that you click Log In.

2009-10-28 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm If the GDM user list (face browser) is disabled, then the user is only presented with a Log In button, rather than a username and password entry field. Disabling the user list is a requirement in an enterprise environment, and lacking the username

[Bug 463026] Re: User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled.

2009-10-28 Thread Joel Ebel
The Log In button which is related to this problem is filed as bug 463026 -- User list search box should be disabled when user list is disabled. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm

[Bug 445123] Re: There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser

2009-10-28 Thread Joel Ebel
Those bugs do not describe the issues we're seeing. I've filed two new bugs at 463026 and 463029. -- There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 445123] Re: There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser

2009-10-23 Thread Joel Ebel
Sebastien, I'm sorry my request bothered you and felt it wasted your time. My intent was the opposite. I looked through the list of open GDM bugs and did not see any that I felt accurately represented the issues I described. I was considering opening new bugs for them, but since you stated

[Bug 445123] Re: There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser

2009-10-22 Thread Joel Ebel
That's an easier way to change the setting. Thanks. Should a separate bug be filed for the issues with the login screen once this is disabled? Or is that going to just be pushed back to upstream gnome too? In an enterprise environment, the new login screen is really sub-optimal. -- There's

[Bug 427067] Re: Unable to configure which users are shown in greeter

2009-10-22 Thread Joel Ebel
gconf-editor still shows up empty. I'm guessing this is related to /var/lib/gdm/.gconf being empty. It seems to just use the values set in /var/log/gdm/.gconf.{defaults,mandatory} I don't see how one goes about adding values to an empty gconf-editor. -- Unable to configure which users are

[Bug 445123] Re: There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser

2009-10-22 Thread Joel Ebel
Can you please provide a link to the open bugs? I would like to track them as well. -- There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 427067] Re: Unable to configure which users are shown in greeter

2009-10-21 Thread Joel Ebel
I think the issue is that these options need to be set for the gdm user. Setting them using gconftool-2 or gconf-editor does not make the changes to the gdm user's gconf store. I even tried su gdm and running gconf- editor, but it's empty. The gdm user doen't have a store apparently, but depends

[Bug 445123] Re: There's no simple way to disable the gdm face browser

2009-10-21 Thread Joel Ebel
As mentioned in another bug, I managed to disable the face browser by hand editing /var/lib/gdm/.gconf.defaults/%gconf-tree.xml There may be an incantation of gconftool-2 which can edit this file in a more friendly, but I haven't discovered it yet. But even then, the login screen is not optimal.