[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

2010-03-04 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
@pablomme: you described the situation very well. However, I'm not sure we shouldn't blame Gtk as well, since usually it's not good to break an API so badly (except for a major version). This Client Side Windows feature is causing serious issues, on my system at least, in many applications

[Bug 386150] Re: Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly

2009-06-26 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
At this point, I think a brainstorm discussion for this issue would be far more suitable than a bug report... -- Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 152879] Re: Nautilus does not warn when deleting read-only files

2009-06-24 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
@ Lightbreeze: are you sure? I mean, I don't really know whether this bug can be considered as a paper-cut or even as a bug itself, but I don't think it should be marked as 'invalid' by the reasons you proposed. If it's a confirmed bug in nautilus, it will affect a large number of people. Please

[Bug 363260] Re: beeps while shutdown or reboot

2009-06-23 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 290204 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290204 I can confirm this as a bug. Actually, this report is a duplicate of bug #290204, that will hopefully be fixed by the One Hundred Paper Cut project in time for the Karmic release. ** This bug has been marked

[Bug 290204] Re: Annoying beep on shutdown using System - Shut down...

2009-06-23 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
I've added bug #363532 to the hundredpapercuts project. It seems strictly related to this very bug, although it describes a different issue (_multiple_ system beeps on shutdown, affecting Ubuntu starting from the Jaunty release). -- Annoying beep on shutdown using System - Shut down...

[Bug 386150] Re: Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly

2009-06-23 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
In some web browsers, Reload and Stop actions shares the same button (set to reload when rendering is done, set to stop when the browser is still processing his task) -- Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386150 You received this bug

[Bug 383255] Re: Eject/Unmount icon in Nautilus sidebar should have hover and click states

2009-06-23 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Isn't this a feature implemented in Gtk-Sharp by the Banshee team? I'm thinking about the Rating row. -- Eject/Unmount icon in Nautilus sidebar should have hover and click states https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 387796] Re: Display icons in the open with ... list

2009-06-22 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Yes, that's a proper observation. BUT, we are talking about a sub-menu containing only a list of applications, and applications are better recognizable by using their own icons. -- Display icons in the open with ... list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387796 You received this bug

[Bug 386150] Re: Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly

2009-06-21 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
I definitely support Brian's idea to _group_ in a location bar all those buttons showing the current fs path. And, if possible, we should reduce their height sizing! -- Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386150 You received this bug

[Bug 152879] Re: Nautilus does not warn when deleting read-only files

2009-06-21 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #342105 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342105 ** Changed in: nautilus Status: Invalid = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #486780 = GNOME Bug Tracker #342105 -- Nautilus does not warn when deleting

[Bug 152879] Re: Nautilus does not warn when deleting read-only files

2009-06-19 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Assuming that you mean Delete and not Move to Trash, I cannot reproduce this bug on Jaunty. -- Nautilus does not warn when deleting read-only files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

[Bug 387544] Re: Nautilus right-click paste within a folder is difficult when folder's view is full

2009-06-19 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 61237 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61237 Yes, it is a really annoying issue, especially when you start a DnD operation. The VA's proposed solution could work, but it doesn't persuade me very much. Is there an elegant way to solve this? -- Nautilus

[Bug 8949] Re: Opening a deleted 'recent document' results in a new file.

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Although a real fix for this issue could easily end in a complex code re-engineering, I think we actually can patch it up in a manner that this bug could be counted as a Paper Cut (http://blog.davebsd.com/2009/06/03/paper-cut/): As TM wrote back in 2004 (!): * Perhaps a better default behavior is

[Bug 8949] Re: Opening a deleted 'recent document' results in a new file.

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Or, we could remove broken entries right _before_ the list shows up. Then, maybe we should open a new bug for the actual re-engineering. By the way, please consider this upstream [bug/proposed solution]: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548069 where a_64 suggests we use standard links

[Bug 8949] Re: Opening a deleted 'recent document' results in a new file.

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Thank you for the report! ;) Waiting for folks from One Hundred Paper Cuts project confirming this bug and hopefully we'll see this fixed in time for Karmic release! Lorenzo -- Opening a deleted 'recent document' results in a new file. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8949 You received

[Bug 388445] Re: Moving to trash a file with a long name cause a oversized dialog

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Thanks for the report. I can confirm this bug both for the nautilus project and as a paper cut. I also attach an image reproducing the issue. ** Attachment added: oversized-delete-dialog.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28076399/oversized-delete-dialog.png ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)

[Bug 388445] Re: Moving to trash a file with a long name cause a oversized dialog

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
whooops I should have set the delay, anyway I think the image is still quite clear. This bug is easily reproducible. -- Moving to trash a file with a long name cause a oversized dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 389083] Re: Nautilus: rotate an image

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 25619 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25619 Thanks for this bug report! I think it affects Eye-of-Gnome, and not Nautilus. It's an issue that used to bother me as well, but I started working around it and now I couldn't even see it anymore! Also, it can

[Bug 389083] Re: Nautilus: rotate an image

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 25619 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25619 whooops, this bug is a duplicate of bug #25619. I'm adding it to the One Hundred Paper Cuts project as well. -- Nautilus: rotate an image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389083 You received this bug

[Bug 25619] Re: eog doesn't ask whether to save changes

2009-06-18 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Adding this bug to the One Hundred Paper Cuts project after triaging bug #389083. ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- eog doesn't ask whether to save changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25619 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 110534] Re: xchat-gnome crashes

2007-10-23 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
@ boricua: I am very sorry about that, but I'm a triager not a developer, so I can't do much... we all need to wait for an xchat-gnome dev, or else hope the next xchat-gnome version won't have this issue. There are lots of bugs out there and it's not so easy to fix them quickly. Usually

[Bug 109647] [users-admin] blank password not allowed

2007-04-30 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools The User Settings tool doesn't allow user to set a blank password. Steps to reproduce: *) System - Administration - User and Groups or) gksu users-admin *) Click on New User - Leave the password fields blank - OK

[Bug 110534] Re: xchat crashes

2007-04-29 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Thank you very much! So the affected package is xchat-gnome. Marking this as confirmed. ** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: xchat = xchat-gnome Status: Needs Info = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - xchat crashes + xchat-gnome crashes -- xchat-gnome crashes

[Bug 110664] Re: [apport] sol crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-27 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Thank you for your report. Tagging this bug as need-i386-retrace. ** Tags added: need-i386-retrace -- [apport] sol crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for

[Bug 78566] Re: startup programs delayed for 2 minutes with compiz/beryl enabled

2007-04-25 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
I can confirm this on Feisty as well! It's very annoying since I've got to wait 2 minutes for using startup apps like the network-manager applet or Avant Window Navigator (very useful together with Compiz). @Sebastien: I think you should mark this at least as Medium importance, since all I've

[Bug 78566] Re: startup programs delayed for 2 minutes with compiz/beryl enabled

2007-04-25 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Anyway, I think the problem is in this process: /usr/bin/compiz.real --no-fbo --ignore-desktop-hints --sm-client-id default0 gconf gconf (It's the process sleeping for 2-3 minutes on startup) By the way, now I have TWO of these processes on my session. Also, right-clicking on the desktop in the

[Bug 73373] Re: Gstreamer segm faults at a certain point of an mp3 file

2006-11-26 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
** Attachment added: gstreamer crash report http://librarian.launchpad.net/5175050/_usr_bin_gst-launch-0.10.1000.crash ** Description changed: That mp3 file is certainly corrupted in some way, but using for instance the xine engine, there isn't such a problem - except a little noise in

[Bug 73373] Gstreamer segm faults at a certain point of an mp3 file

2006-11-26 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
Public bug reported: That mp3 file is certainly corrupted in some way, but using for instance the xine engine, there isn't such a problem - except a little noise in the point that make gstreamer crash. * Every software using gstreamer is affected by this problem (rhythmbox, totem, quod libet...)

[Bug 73373] Re: Gstreamer segm faults at a certain point of an mp3 file

2006-11-26 Thread Lorenzo Delledonne
I'll also attach the log file made by this command: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ GST_DEBUG=3,gnl*:5 gst-launch-0.10 filesrc location=Desktop/Track\ 02.mp3 ! decodebin ! audioconvert ! esdsink ~/Desktop/log 21 I hope it's useful... NOTE: I'm using libgstreamer0.10-0 version 0.10.10-1ubuntu2 under