[Bug 785940] [NEW] gtk theme engine not working

2011-05-20 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gtk2-engines As far as I can tell what I'm seeing is the symptom of the gtk theme engine not working properly, this is on a qemu-kvm instance, using unity-2d. The unity-2d specific theming seems to remain as intended. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease:

[Bug 785940] Re: gtk theme egninge not working

2011-05-20 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785940/+attachment/2136740/+files/Screenshot.png ** Summary changed: - gtk theme egninge not working + gtk theme engine not working -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations

2011-04-18 Thread arand
** Description changed: The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases as well. - Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: - gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel

[Bug 296028] Re: AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug

2010-06-25 Thread arand
fullscreen application flicker tooltip -- AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 296028] Re: AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug

2010-06-25 Thread arand
Erm, sorry for noise, that was meant for a search, ignore, ignore... -- AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 435002] Re: gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in pango_utf8_strlen()

2010-06-12 Thread arand
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 404681 gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in free() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with

[Bug 587534] Re: rhythmbox segfault on launch

2010-05-31 Thread arand
Forwarded upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620147 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #620147 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620147 ** Also affects: rhythmbox via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620147 Importance: Unknown Status:

[Bug 587534] Re: rhythmbox segfault on launch

2010-05-31 Thread arand
initial upstream was a dupe ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #617587 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617587 ** Changed in: rhythmbox Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #620147 = GNOME Bug Tracker #617587 -- rhythmbox segfault on launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587534

[Bug 588076] [NEW] [FTBFS] rhythmbox tries to define pause, which is already used by unistd.h

2010-05-31 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Rhythmbox fails to build with the following error: ### Making all in remote make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/rhythmbox-0.12.8/remote' Making all in dbus make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/rhythmbox-0.12.8/remote/dbus' \ #

[Bug 588076] Re: [FTBFS] rhythmbox tries to define pause, which if already used by unistd.h

2010-05-31 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49468559/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49468560/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: GstreamerVersions.txt

[Bug 588076] Re: [FTBFS] rhythmbox tries to define pause, which is already used by unistd.h

2010-05-31 Thread arand
Reported upstream as: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620199 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #620199 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620199 ** Also affects: rhythmbox via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620199 Importance: Unknown Status:

[Bug 587534] Re: rhythmbox segfault on launch

2010-05-31 Thread arand
I can confirm that the patch applies cleanly and works, seemingly perfect , however, I also had to work around Bug #588076 in order to make it build on maverick. -- rhythmbox segfault on launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 588076] Re: [FTBFS] rhythmbox tries to define pause, which is already used by unistd.h

2010-05-31 Thread arand
Grabbed git commit http://git.gnome.org/browse/rhythmbox/commit/?id=bd389d8e8a2b1f3a914dcd4bb17e75fb8837d78a into debdiff. This also contains the fix for Bug #588076 ** Patch added: rhythmbox_0.12.8-0ubuntu5.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49472643/rhythmbox_0.12.8-0ubuntu5.debdiff --

[Bug 587534] Re: rhythmbox segfault on launch

2010-05-31 Thread arand
Grabbed git commit above into debdiff This also conatins the fix for Bug #588076 ** Patch added: rhythmbox_0.12.8-0ubuntu5.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49472662/rhythmbox_0.12.8-0ubuntu5.debdiff -- rhythmbox segfault on launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587534 You received

[Bug 587534] [NEW] rhythmbox segfault on launch [maverick]

2010-05-30 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Rhythmbox segfaults on launch, gdb backtrace with rhythmbox-dbg installed, attached. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: rhythmbox 0.12.8-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.34-4.11-generic 2.6.34 Uname: Linux

[Bug 587534] Re: rhythmbox segfault on launch [maverick]

2010-05-30 Thread arand
** Attachment added: rhbox_gdb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49389047/rhbox_gdb.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49388873/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49388874/GConfNonDefault.txt **

[Bug 584287] Re: Unexpected X error (BadDrawable) causing metacity to abort in maverick

2010-05-24 Thread arand
@zoff: Read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete Is this debdiff of any use? Is this being addressed upstream? Should it be brought upstream? ... ** Patch added: metacity_2.30.1-0ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49046374/metacity_2.30.1-0ubuntu2.debdiff --

[Bug 584738] [NEW] metacity crashes on opening Firefox or OpenOffice

2010-05-23 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: metacity PROBLEM Whenever OpenOffice or Firefox is launched, metacity crashes and leves desktop unusable (apart from panel, other apps not focusable) OBSERVATIONS When metacity is invoked from VT with: DISPLAY=:0.0 metacity --replace and then firefox

[Bug 584738] Re: metacity crashes on opening Firefox or OpenOffice

2010-05-23 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48987993/Dependencies.txt -- metacity crashes on opening Firefox or OpenOffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 584738] Re: metacity crashes on opening Firefox or OpenOffice

2010-05-23 Thread arand
** Description changed: Binary package hint: metacity PROBLEM Whenever OpenOffice or Firefox is launched, metacity crashes and leves desktop unusable (apart from panel, other apps not focusable) OBSERVATIONS When metacity is invoked from VT with: DISPLAY=:0.0 metacity

[Bug 584738] Re: metacity crashes on opening Firefox or OpenOffice

2010-05-23 Thread arand
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 584287 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584287 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 584287 Unexpected X error (BadDrawable) causing metacity to abort in maverick -- metacity crashes on opening Firefox or OpenOffice

[Bug 584287] Re: Unexpected X error (BadDrawable) causing metacity to abort in maverick

2010-05-23 Thread arand
Also happens when launching OpenOffice. Here using virtualbox (with ose-guest-utils). I would venture a guess that this is not hardware/driver-related. -- Unexpected X error (BadDrawable) causing metacity to abort in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584287 You received this bug

[Bug 584287] Re: Unexpected X error (BadDrawable) causing metacity to abort in maverick

2010-05-23 Thread arand
Here is a backtrace with debugsymbols installed, if that might be of any use (do hint if I'm doing things horribly wrong, I have little experience with gdb). ** Attachment added: gdb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48995000/gdb.txt -- Unexpected X error (BadDrawable) causing metacity to

[Bug 329146] Re: nautilus unable to start on login

2010-05-08 Thread arand
Since we have so much baggage from an old prerelease Jaunty issue, which was likely fixed, and is likely not related to the new issues seen: Please report a new and clean bug report detailing the issues present NOW, with Lucid. I think from an organisatory point of view, and for the sake of

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-05-07 Thread arand
Do note that this bug and fix only concerns column selection flow handling e.g. the common issue that selecting one column will select the other simultaneously. The (also very common) issue of selected text disappearing and displaying random characters is a separate issue NOT addressed by this

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-04-21 Thread arand
@João Gomes: Hmm, that is the main issue that these patches are supposed to take care of. You are running the patched version? Which document are you testing on? And the patched version does still struggle in some specific cases, something which will probably not be addressed until the far-future

[Bug 552680] Re: Window Close Buttons on the wrong side

2010-03-31 Thread arand
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532633 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 Please see Bug #532633 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 532633 [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment -- Window Close Buttons on the wrong side

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-28 Thread arand
Might be metacity-related, since seen on VirtualBox instance proper install running on nvidia blob. adding metacity task ** Also affects: metacity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549919

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-28 Thread arand
And on nouveau as well (with metacity) -- active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-28 Thread arand
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: gnome-panel - When active items in the window list are overlapped by tooltips or dropped menus, the colour of the overlapped area changes to the non-active colour and remains so after the overlapping item is gone. Hence window list items ends

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-28 Thread arand
Problem seen on Karmic with nvida blob as well. No regression ** Tags added: metacity ** Tags removed: lucid -- active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-28 Thread arand
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #509922 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509922 ** Also affects: gnome-panel via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509922 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-03-27 Thread arand
@Benjamin Ah, yes, I moved that thing over to Bug #33288 instead missed removing the sponsors. -- Some problems with marking and copying text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

[Bug 549919] [NEW] active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-27 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel When active items in the window list are overlapped by tooltips or dropped menus, the colour of the overlapped area changes to the non-active colour and remains so after the overlapping item is gone. Hence window list items ends up

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-27 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42210914/Screenshot.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42209662/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42209663/GConfNonDefault.txt

[Bug 549919] Re: active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps

2010-03-27 Thread arand
Video showing miscolouring with tooltip overlap ** Attachment added: out.ogv http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42211034/out.ogv -- active items in window list miscoloured by overlaps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-03-20 Thread arand
@Nigel Babu: My impression is that that Brian Ewins' comments is probably as much upstream feedback as we are going to get. Since the upstream focus is now shifted to the above mentioned long-term solution. In that sense I would say the patches as it is now are complete, since it's likely that

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-03-17 Thread arand
(until Lucid+1?), there's always my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~arand/+archive/poppler -- Evince doesn't handle columns properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 300777] Re: cut and paste of link alters permissions of linked file.

2010-03-07 Thread arand
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 418135 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418135 This looks like a duplicate of Bug #418135, which has been fixed. If not, feel free to re-open. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 418135 Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-03-06 Thread arand
@aloctavodia Glad to hear it works. Note that I am in no way involved with the coding of these patches, all credit should go to Brian Ewins and Marek Kasik. I have simply packaged their patches for ease of installing. All feedback/suggestions that doesn't concern the packaging and/or are

[Bug 520685] Re: Opening Computer with nautilus fails 1st time after login when using Extra Pane view (A.K.A split view mode)

2010-03-06 Thread arand
Attached debdiff with patch of commit c8ded383147e0f860f9a206e9f45606bf16effe9 Don't remember status of extra pane in a gconf key The focus for Nautilus' split view mode are occasional, temporary switches to a split view mode for heavy-duty filebrowsing, not to be a permanent double pane

[Bug 532298] [NEW] On first run nautilus displays a thin border on sides, not if restarted

2010-03-04 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus A grey line is shown on both sides of the desktop on first booting the liveCD If running: $ killall nautilus $ nautilus disown The grey lines dissapear I don't know if this full border is intentional, but the change can't be. attaching two

[Bug 532298] Re: On first run nautilus displays a thin border on sides, not if restarted

2010-03-04 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40208935/Screenshot.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40205415/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40205416/usr_lib_nautilus.txt

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-02-26 Thread arand
Added rough debdiff for Lucid as well, and testing packages in my PPA. Anyone care to do any testing? ** Patch added: rough_poppler_0.12.4-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39815138/rough_poppler_0.12.4-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- Evince doesn't handle columns properly

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-19 Thread arand
Testing packages for the upstream patches, for ubuntu 9.10, are available from my poppler ppa, (nil safety included). -- Some problems with marking and copying text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-19 Thread arand
_rough_ debdiff attached (e.g. patches are not in upstream master yet (as far as I know), changelog might be a tad bit too verbose). But it would definitely be great if we could get this into Lucid at least. ** Patch added: rough_poppler_0.12.0-0ubuntu2.2.debdiff

[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly

2010-02-19 Thread arand
Testing packages for the upstream patches, for ubuntu 9.10, are available from my poppler ppa, (nil safety included). _rough_ debdiff attached (e.g. patches are not in upstream master yet (as far as I know), changelog might be a tad bit too verbose). But it would definitely be great if we could

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-19 Thread arand
Hmm, seems like I was mistaken at a point or two, the correct bug report for the _selection copy_ of text would be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/33288 However the invisible-text-on-selection is likely a separate bug, which would be appropriate to keep here. My patch does

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-19 Thread arand
** Changed in: poppler Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: poppler Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: poppler Remote watch: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #3188 = None ** Changed in: poppler Status: New = Invalid -- Some problems with marking and copying text

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-19 Thread arand
** Description changed: + PLEASE NOTE: + This bug should only be about the disappearing-text-on selection issue (bug a below), for the other selection issues see Bug #33288 + + --- + + Original description: + + I have found two problems with marking/copying text in the following .pdf

[Bug 296554] Re: Highlighting words selects highlights random things

2010-02-19 Thread arand
I think this is similar to the issue in Bug #33288 -- Highlighting words selects highlights random things https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 40872] Re: Desktop icons are allowed to overlap horribly

2010-02-18 Thread arand
I've built nautilus with Bill's patch in my ppa, totally unsafe to test, but feel free to. -- Desktop icons are allowed to overlap horribly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-18 Thread arand
** Also affects: poppler (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #3188 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 ** Also affects: poppler via

[Bug 39321] Re: Some problems with marking and copying text

2010-02-18 Thread arand
Patch series with a lot of corrections are available in the upstream linked poppler bug. I'm going to see if I can test these and hopefully get some ppa-action going. Possibly even SRU. -- Some problems with marking and copying text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39321 You received this bug

[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations

2010-02-08 Thread arand
** Description changed: + The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these + being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases + as well. + + - + + Temporary solution: + Backup the state of your panel: + gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel

[Bug 508082] Re: return back interface tab in gnome-appearance-properties

2010-02-06 Thread arand
** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #592756 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592756 ** Also affects: gnome-control-center via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592756

[Bug 10905] Re: Can't use any global keyboard shortcuts or hotkeys when applet/menu is open

2010-01-25 Thread arand
Also, a nasty side effect of this is that gksudo segfaults when run whilst a menu is open, sometimes also throwing in a scary-looking Someone is trying to hijack you mouse!-warning -- Can't use any global keyboard shortcuts or hotkeys when applet/menu is open

[Bug 47048] Re: Can't grab mouse with menu bar/main menu open

2010-01-25 Thread arand
Still happening in Jaunty and Karmic, gksu segfaults (the grab warning flashes up sometimes) when launched with open menu, crash report from jaunty system attached. ** Attachment added: _usr_bin_gksu.1000.crash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38379240/_usr_bin_gksu.1000.crash ** Changed in:

[Bug 437429] Re: No GUI to configure/disable login sound

2009-12-19 Thread arand
gconf-disabling workaround did not work for me, renaming did. -- No GUI to configure/disable login sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations

2009-11-28 Thread arand
Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml and then restore it whenever it gets messed up: gconftool-2 --load panel_backup.xml killall gnome-panel(kills and auto-respawns) -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly

[Bug 454975] Re: brasero coredump lists several files in home directory it has no business logging

2009-10-30 Thread arand
In what way is this currently invalid? I would argue that all relevant information is available here and that reopening a new bug is superfluous. Especially also since Bug #454873 already exists. -- brasero coredump lists several files in home directory it has no business logging

[Bug 454975] reopening

2009-10-19 Thread arand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Real-life example is available in Bug #454873 Rest of files related to this particular instance of the crash attached. CoreDump replaced with gzipped equivalent. Hence reopening. ## Default comment Info: ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64

[Bug 454975] [NEW] brasero coredump lists several files in home directory it has no business logging

2009-10-18 Thread arand
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero When looking at a crashdump from brasero it lists several parts of the home directory that are completely uneccessary (and in addition a possibly privacy concern). Example is contents of ~/.quakelive/ example coredump attached ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 454975] Re: brasero coredump lists several files in home directory it has no business logging

2009-10-18 Thread arand
** Attachment added: CoreDump http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33915112/CoreDump ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33915114/Dependencies.txt -- brasero coredump lists several files in home directory it has no business logging

[Bug 442812] Re: Brasero denies permission to eject volume

2009-10-05 Thread arand
This should be reported against the brasero package in ubuntu, not against launchpad iself which is reserved for bugs for example in the web interface of the bugtracker. I took the liberty of changing it. Thanks for reporting the bug. ** Also affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 439278] Re: Nautilus only sends loaded signal to xsplash when show_desktop is set

2009-10-01 Thread arand
gconf: /apps/nautilus/preferences/show_desktop -- Nautilus only sends loaded signal to xsplash when show_desktop is set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-30 Thread arand
I just tested this on a VBox Dapper, seems like the issue is nonexistant there. Invalidating for now. ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Dapper) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

[Bug 438399] [NEW] baobab crash on analyzing deselected device

2009-09-28 Thread arand
to crash (baobab:10775): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_store_get_value: assertion `VALID_ITER (iter, tree_store)' failed (baobab:10775): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1~arand/gobject/gtype.c:3940: type id `0' is invalid (baobab:10775): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: can't

[Bug 438399] Re: baobab crash on analyzing deselected device

2009-09-28 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32634431/Dependencies.txt -- baobab crash on analyzing deselected device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 438399] Re: baobab crash on analyzing deselected device

2009-09-28 Thread arand
Tested with default version of libglib2-0 Running gdb gives some more info (immidiately after a copy of former messages), no idea if useful at all: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fedceb1d780 (LWP 5025)] 0x7fedcdee42c4 in gtk_tree_model_get_valist

[Bug 438399] Re: baobab crash on analyzing deselected device

2009-09-28 Thread arand
valground as well: ** Attachment added: valgrind_baobab.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32636651/valgrind_baobab.txt -- baobab crash on analyzing deselected device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 438399] Re: baobab crash on analyzing deselected device

2009-09-28 Thread arand
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 369740 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369740 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 369740 baobab crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_tree_model_get_valist() -- baobab crash on analyzing deselected device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438399

[Bug 324700] Re: gnome-volume-control is missing system events sound adjustment

2009-09-26 Thread arand
Yes indeed, I have been tearing my hair lately to try to find a solution to this. I normally disable login/out sounds and keep the rest of the system sounds. Now this is seemingly impossible in Karmic. Please, do something about this regression! -- gnome-volume-control is missing system events

[Bug 324700] Re: gnome-volume-control is missing system events sound adjustment

2009-09-26 Thread arand
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #596454 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596454 ** Also affects: gnome-media via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596454 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gnome-media (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed

[Bug 209520] Re: unclear error when lanman authentication is refused on the server

2009-09-13 Thread arand
Same as Trab above. Connecting to SMB NAS, on 9.04: u...@comp:~$ smbclient //192.168.1.3/sharename -U user password Domain=[ȇ] OS=[] Server=[���] Server requested LANMAN password (share-level security) but 'client lanman auth' is disabled tree connect failed: SUCCESS - 0 If adding to

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-09 Thread arand
** Attachment removed: backport_to_intrepid_debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31519411/backport_to_intrepid_debdiff -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418135 You received this bug notification

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-09 Thread arand
added new debdiff for intrepid, typo in changelog regarding patch filename. (61_* is already in intrepid for another patch, I simply used 62_* instead) ** Attachment added: backport_to_intrepid_debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31532869/backport_to_intrepid_debdiff -- Permissions of

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-09 Thread arand
Getting the fix into hardy may be non-trivial, since the patch seems to depend on the function g_set_error_literal, which is, i assume, not implemented in pre-intrepid glib (attached build errors for hardy). This function is implemented here:

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-09 Thread arand
I've edited the patch to use g_set_error instead of g_set_error_literal (simply replacing the function since the arguments seems to already be in the right format). Since I have minimal knowledge about the actual code involved in this I can only confirm that it works with no immediate

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-08 Thread arand
I've uploaded the proposed jaunty updated version to my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~arand/+archive/ppa I've tested this on i386 amd64, where I it seems to solve the issue, with no noticable regressions so far, Bispop's issue included. -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-08 Thread arand
** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus TEST CASE: 1. Create a symlink to a file or folder, on which you normally are able change permissions. (touch ~/testfile ln -s ~/testfile ~/testlink) 2. Copy the symlink to anywhere using Nautilus (ctrl+c ctrl+v) 3. Check

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-08 Thread arand
I've put together a proposed update for intrepid as well which has been built and tested locally in an i386 virtualbox instance (issue gone, no immediate regressions). This also uploaded to my ppa, testing welcome. Attached debdiff of this proposed update. ** Attachment added:

Re: [Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-06 Thread arand
Bispop, I cannot confirm that, for me viewing trash when it contains a *.desktop file works absolutely fine. So it seems like there might be more to that issue than just this update? -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-03 Thread arand
Quick testing in VBox confirms that 2.21.5-0ubuntu3 fixes the bug and solves the regression. I mixed together a proposition debdiff for the backport to Jaunty, if that's of any use. ** Attachment added: proposed backport to Jaunty debdiff

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-01 Thread arand
Tested on Jaunty by simply adding 61_skip-perms-on-symlinks.patch from karmic source and inserting entry in series file (debian/patches). This fixes the bug on current Jaunty. I've created a _rough_ debdiff with my changes and added this package to my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~arand/+archive

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-01 Thread arand
** Attachment added: rough_debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3974/rough_debdiff -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-01 Thread arand
This bug has been fixed upstream using what seems like a completely different method, we might have to consider whether we want that or current karmic solution. ** Changed in: nautilus Status: New = Fix Released -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-09-01 Thread arand
Created a debdiff for Jaunty using the upstream patch, also added (replaced) to PPA ** Attachment added: upstream_patch_debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31119367/upstream_patch_debdiff -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus

2009-08-31 Thread arand
This bug is also present (in virtualbox instances) on: ubuntu 8.04 livecd updated install ubuntu 8.10 livecd updated install (fedora 11 updated install, GNOME Developer Kit 2.27.20090727 updated) There seems to be some SRUing to do... -- Permissions of symlinked source file/folder set to 777

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

2009-08-28 Thread arand
This seems to be dependend on symlinks. On a new user this does not occur. However, if I create a symlink in the user directory pointing to /home/user the issue appears. This wast most likely the cause for the earlier occurances also, since wine creates symlinks in

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

2009-08-28 Thread arand
Cheers Pedro, I'm in the works of hopefully narrowing the bug down a bit, so some updating in the upstream description might be required when done. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus TEST CASE: + 1. Create a symlink inside ~/ linking to either ~ or a directory within ~

[Bug 418135] Re: Permission of source folder in ~ set to 777 if symlinked and copied via nautilus

2009-08-28 Thread arand
Even further testing done: Only thing needed to reproduce is a symlink to a directory your user are able to change permissions of. If this symlink is copied by nautilus, to anywhere, the symlinked directory will get it's permissions set to 777. ** Summary changed: - Permission of source folder

[Bug 418135] Re: Subscribe someone else Search Search arand • Launchpad Ubuntu “nautilus” package Overview / Code / Bugs / Blueprints / Translations / Answers Bug #418135 report

2009-08-28 Thread arand
Pedro, could you update the upstream report description to match this one please? ** Summary changed: - Permission of symlinked source file/folder set to 777 if symlink is copied via nautilus +Subscribe someone else Search Search arand • Launchpad

[Bug 419823] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV on startup

2009-08-27 Thread arand
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30895786/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30895787/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30895788/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 419823] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV on startup

2009-08-27 Thread arand
Duplicate of Bug #403549 ? -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

2009-08-27 Thread arand
** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30921490/usr_lib_nautilus.txt ** Tags added: apport-collected -- Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418135 You received this bug

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

2009-08-27 Thread arand
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30921489/Dependencies.txt -- Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 418135] apport-collect data

2009-08-27 Thread arand
Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.27.91-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-7.27-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.31-7-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin

[Bug 418135] Re: Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

2009-08-27 Thread arand
Confirmed in Karmic on 'first' laptop (mentioned above). Apparently 777 permissions are also set on the subfolders: Desktop, Music, Pictures and Videos (in this specific case?) -- Permissions on user home directory (source) set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

[Bug 418135] [NEW] Permissions on user home directory set to 777 after copying it via nautilus

2009-08-24 Thread arand
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus TEST CASE: 1. Launch nautilus 2. Copy user directory to other location (e.g. /tmp) 3. Skip special files which cannot be copied (nautilus pop-up dialogues) 4. Check permissions of user's

  1   2   >