** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939743/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939744/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25939745/ProcStatus.txt
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
More headaches from the 2008 decision to change the session management
protocols...
Fortunately, upstream has fixed this in gnome-terminal 2.26.1.
Unfortunately, the launchpad integration patches from the current version don't
apply
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 249373 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:56:20PM -, Pedro Villavicencio wrote:
I suspect that this is actually a duplicate of 333603, an indication that
gnome-terminal in jaunty-beta is backlevel, or a new bug.
There
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 07:13:13PM -, Chris Coulson wrote:
gnome-session in Jaunty has preliminary support for session saving again
now (using the patch linked from that upstream report), so this is
clearly a limitation in gnome-terminal now.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:23:26AM -, Chris Coulson wrote:
Thank you for your bug report, but why do you think that this is not a
duplicate of bug 249373? This functionality has not been ported to the
new gnome-session codebase yet, so bug 249373 still applies to Jaunty.
To me, this
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:16:04PM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Could preople stop this rant there, that's not constructive, the choice
taken for intrepid was wrong but everybody does mistake and now is time
to get things fixed rather than blaming the distro team or GNOME again
and again for
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:50:06PM -, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-session - 2.25.92-0ubuntu1
And whoever claimed this didn't do squat for regression testing.
sequence
login.
system-preferences-startup programs-options-
check automatically remember
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:23:26AM -, Chris Coulson wrote:
Thank you for your bug report, but why do you think that this is not a
duplicate of bug 249373? This functionality has not been ported to the
new gnome-session codebase yet, so bug 249373 still applies to Jaunty.
To me, this
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 12:33:56AM -, Kees Kuip wrote:
At the top of the page I see a link to bugzilla of gnome:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536685
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387
is probably the better bug to track.
536685 refers more to a bug in migrating to
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:01:56PM -, Mozg wrote:
I agree that this bug should be a high priority fix as many users of
previous releases are used to this option and expect it to work in the
next release. I have this problem and it is _very_ annoying!
Complaining to the ubuntu bug tracker
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:02:10PM -, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
Yes, the firefox is just killed. Anyway, gnome-session-properties
complains that saving session is not implemented yet :) And I don't see
any session file under ~/.gnome2, ~/.gnome2_private, ~/.config
the new session protocol has
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 04:06:03AM -, Johne wrote:
This isn't something that Ubuntu can really fix anyhow. Only Gnome's
developers should be willing to spend the time to fix, not Ubuntu's.
Well, there's a fix, but at this point it would be a mess.
Revert to 2.22.x GNOME. Upgrade to 2.24.x
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
I have noticed this new behavior since upgrading from hardy to intrepid.
Behavior persists with gnome-session 2.24.0-0ubuntu1, but I suspect that
it occurs with any version since the session moved from
~/.gnome2/session to gconf.
This
Sebatien,
Would you be kind enough to point us to the mailing list or WIKI that discusses
these upstream issues?
Per the August 8th changelog entry within the gnome-session source indicates
this was fixed.
Traffic on the desktop-devel-list is somewhat sparse after the initial proposal
to
14 matches
Mail list logo
