** Changed in: gvfs
Importance: Unknown = High
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/hardy-proposed/nautilus
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/gvfs
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/hardy-proposed/gvfs
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/intrepid-proposed/gvfs
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
This bug was fixed in the package gvfs - 0.2.5-0ubuntu8
---
gvfs (0.2.5-0ubuntu8) hardy-proposed; urgency=low
* Reintroduce patch 95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch.
* debian/patches/97_fix_smb_compat.patch: Fix daemon/libsmb-compat.h
to allow *un*setting the anonymous auth
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:2.22.5.1-0ubuntu3
---
nautilus (1:2.22.5.1-0ubuntu3) hardy-proposed; urgency=low
* debian/patches/91_svn_change_new_mounts_correctly_displayed.patch:
- correctly apply now (lp: #207072)
-- Sebastien Bacher seb...@canonical.com
After installing the latest gvfs and nautilus from hardy-proposed, I can say
that all is working well now, like in intrepid and jaunty.
Thanks again to all the developers!
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
Accepted nautilus into hardy-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy)
Seb uploaded a fixed nautilus package to the queue. Stalling until
8.04.3 is released.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an
** Tags removed: qa-jaunty-desktop regression-proposed verification-
failed
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug
it really would be nice to able to configure the Domain-Server or Workgroup
of a MS-Net when you install Ubuntu or be able to search it automatically.
You must fiddle around with config files to get the correct name.
Older versions had a configuration (The old network manager) to setup
this.
I
Thank you very much, Steve, for fixing this bug.
I have applied your patch by recompiling gvfs from source and now the browsing
of the network and of the shares is working as expected.
However I'm still experiencing a known issue with nautilus: double clicking the
first time on a share icon does
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 09:38:57AM -, Renzo Bagnati wrote:
However I'm still experiencing a known issue with nautilus: double
clicking the first time on a share icon does not open a new window, I
have to double click again a second time to actually open it. This should
have been fixed by
Sorry for not having noticed in the changelogs that the patch was introduced in
nautilus 1:2.22.5.1-0ubuntu2
I was already using it with all hardy-updates. However, since I was still
seeing that behaviour, I tried to build nautilus from source. This is the
relevant output of dpkg-buildpackage:
ok, setting this back to 'in progress' for nautilus.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because
** Also affects: dell-mini
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Milestone: ubuntu-8.04.3 = ubuntu-8.04.4
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: Sebastien Bacher (seb128) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
As with so many other bugs, the solution is trivial once the problem can
be pinpointed. Here is the debdiff for hardy-proposed, fixing this bug
at last.
The new patch indicates a bug in daemon/libsmb-compat.h which is still
present upstream in the latest version, so ideally the patch should be
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a
As requested by Martin, here are the steps to reproduce the regression:
1.Install Ubuntu 8.04.2 on one system.
2. Install the samba package on a second system (virtual machine or otherwise
- just make sure it shares a broadcast domain with your hardy desktop test
system). Make sure that this
Just in case it's useful, I reproduced the regression with a hardy
chroot, using only command line tools:
1. Install samba on outside system
2. Kill all gvfs stuff (outside and inside chroot):
$ ps ux|grep gvfs|awk '{print $2}'|xargs kill
3. Mount gvfs smb and list it in hardy chroot:
Sebastien and Steve are working on this. This might also need a samba
upgrade, since current testing showed that the gvfs patch uses some
libsmbclient features which apparently didn't work yet in hardy's samba
version. So either these need to be backported or we need to change the
gvfs patch to
The proposed fix was pulled from hardy-proposed, but Steve made it
available again on his PPA at http://ppa.launchpad.net/vorlon/ppa/ubuntu
for further confirmation of the regression.
Using gvfs and gvfs-backends 0.2.5-0ubuntu8~ppa1 from there, along with
nautilus 2.22.5.1-0ubuntu1 from
I also experience the same behavior using nautilus 2.22.5.1-0ubuntu2
from hardy-proposed.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
I have now helped a friend install 32 bit Jaunty on his office network.
All work stations are clean installs of Jaunty that need to browse his
file server which is Windows server 2003. He also has some printers
attached to and shared by his Ubuntu work stations that need to print
from the file
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:27:49PM -, Martin G Miller wrote:
Something about DNS redirection causes network browsing failures in
Nautilus.
That is unrelated to this bug report.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
rolling this back to 'triaged' since the fix in hardy-proposed seems to
not work. I'm uploading a new gvfs package to hardy-proposed with this
patch reverted, and trying to fix bug #216104.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
--
nautilus does not display
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Milestone: ubuntu-8.04.3 = None
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-8.04.3
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification
the name resolution issue is a different one, could you open a new bug?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug
** Tags added: regression-proposed verification-failed
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
could you try if the new issue is there in jaunty too?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
yep, I have 9.04 installed so will try to run tests today and will let you
know
2009/5/11 Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com
could you try if the new issue is there in jaunty too?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
No, the issues of comment 220 are not present in jaunty and in intrepid.
They are specific of hardy and of the
95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch, since reverting to the version of
gvfs in hardy-updates restores the ability to browse the smb:/// Windows
Network (but not, of course, the domain
I maintain 2 networks with mixed ubuntu / Windows XP SP2 machines and this
problem has not been resolved for me. All of my Ubuntu machines whether they
are clean installs of 8.04 or 8.10 or 9.04, 32 or 64 bit or upgrades from
earlier versions all exhibit the failure to display or browse smb
Is there a need to test it on 8.10 then?
2009/5/11 Renzo Bagnati ren...@gmail.com
No, the issues of comment 220 are not present in jaunty and in intrepid.
They are specific of hardy and of the
95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch, since reverting to the version of
gvfs in hardy-updates
I have tested the gvfs and nautilus packages in hardy-proposed. Here are the
problems I found (they are essentially the same described some time ago in the
upstream bug report:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c57
In virtualbox running ubuntu 8.04.2:
When the machine is not
Thank you for noticing I uploaded a fixed version
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs
Sebastien,
looks like that in the current gvfs packages in hardy-proposed the
95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch was not really applied. The patch
file in the source contains a typo:
--- gvfs-1.0.2.orig/debian/patches/91_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch
+++
** Tags removed: verification-done
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
Accepted gvfs into hardy-proposed; please test and give feedback here.
Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Tags added:
the feedback has been good on intrepid and jaunty let's upload to hardy
now
** Attachment added: debdiff for the hardy update
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25613817/gvfs.debdiff
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
the update has been moved to intrepid-updates
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in:
** Attachment added: nautilus hardy update
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25614391/nautilus.debdiff
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sebastien,
I tried to implement your .debdiff following the instructions from
here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingGuide/BuildFromDebdiff?highlight=(debdiff)
And after following those steps I ended up with five different (related)
nautilus.deb s.
Now they all have different
Sorry guys, but it's still not working in our situation (connecting from
a fully patched 8.10 box to our IBM iSeries running i5/OS version 6r1m0
with i5/OS NetServer).
When I try to browse the server using smb://server in nautilus, I get
the following error:
Could not display smb://server.
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:40:39PM -, Matthijs ten Kate wrote:
I can imagine that our problem is not fully related to the original bug
since the i5/OS NetServer software wasn't compiled by our friend from
Redmond, so if I need to file a new bug for our situation, please let me
know.
Today I received the updates to gvfs (1.0.2-0ubuntu2) and, finally, now
I can browse the shares \o/ (nearly 1 year later).
Thanks all the patcher's!
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug
Hi everyone.
I'm very happy! This annoying bug was finally patched. At home is harder
to try but in my work place I have a full patched Ubuntu 8.10.
This morning I patched and rigth away tried to navigate several XP
computer with success after Ubuntu ask me for the Domain user pass. So
far so
JuanHoyos [2009-02-14 16:22 -]:
Will this bugfix make it to Hardy someday?
Yes.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
This bug was fixed in the package gvfs - 1.0.2-0ubuntu2
---
gvfs (1.0.2-0ubuntu2) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low
* debian/patches/91_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch:
- upstream svn change to fix samba browsing issue for networks which
require an identification (lp:
Will this bugfix make it to Hardy someday?
Juan David
---
Aviso legal (disclaimer): http://www.videobase.net/disclaimer/
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification
I described test results or problmes in comment #201 - is this still
worked on and included in this bug report or should I open new ones for
this?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug
I also confirm 2) from above, I cannot browse my home directory on a remote
samba server
works fine from the command line...
I have serveral Linux stations which connect to a server, so this is
essential for me, any ideas if anyone is working on it ?
Thanks to all
Adam
--
nautilus does
another confirmation for correct authentification after accessing a
share and browsing beeing possible again, but ...
1) after accessing a share (opening a document), an icon is placed on
the desktop. After some time I wanted to access the share again using
the desktop icon, but got an error
Tested gvfs (1.0.2-0ubuntu2) an nautilus (1:2.24.1-0ubuntu2) from
intrepid-proposed.
They work very well inside my AD network, with and without kerberos tickets.
Thanks to all the developers involved.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Works well on my network too. I get prompted for credentials as soon as
I click on a server which requires them. The gvfs-mount command also
works now in conjunction with the GNOME keyring, allowing me to
automatically mount shares within shell scripts. Thanks!
--
nautilus does not display
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-failed verification-needed
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
On Intrepid and Jaunty everything work. Tanks
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.
--
I added the pre-release updates to intrepid and tested browsing it
works.
However, If I try to Connect to a server and don't specify the share
name I get and error saying unable to mount. I believe in previous
versions I expected to get a list of shares. Maybe this behavior change
was
Update,
Cannot display location smb://servername/
The message I get is No application is registered as handling this file
- Original Message -
From: max mik...@gmail.com
To: ja...@rubixnet.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 12:23:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Bug
I can reproduce the connect to server GUI issue. Steps:
1. Click on Places menu and select Connect to Server
2. From Service Type dropdown list select Windows Share
3. Type server name in Server field
4. Press connect
At this point you will get the error described above. Expected behavior
I am running intrepid.
My machine is not joined to any domain.
I go to Places - Connect to Server...
Select select Windows Share from the service type.
Enter the:
Servername
Username
Domain
Click Connect
I get a prompt for the password
Enter the password.
Then I get the error message
Cannot
I'd also like to add that this is not a regression, the unpatched
version of nautilus/gvfs also gives the exact same results.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a
Tab, this is a different issue than the one being discussed here. The
problem you are reporting is discussed in bug #216104.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a
I agree the unpatched version does have the same behavior, however I was
referring to the pre-hardy version of ubuntu when this problem initially
came up. Gutsy did not have this issue.
- Original Message -
From: NTolerance rob...@gmail.com
To: ja...@rubixnet.com
Sent: Monday, January
While the new version works well with my Windows-hosted shares, Samba
shares on Linux systems have an issue if restrict anonymous = 2 or
browseable = no is set in /etc/samba/smb.conf. In this event clicking
on the Samba server does not prompt for authentication and no shares are
displayed because
Ok thanks,
The browsing functionality from inside nautilus does work ok then.
Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: Etienne Goyer etienne.go...@canonical.com
To: ja...@rubixnet.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 1:40:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does
the bug there is specifically about browsing networks which require
authentification, if you have an another issue which is not specific to
the candidate upgrade which has just been uploaded use and another bug
to discuss the issue
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided = High
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received
there is some comments about the patching work on the upstream bug and
one about jaunty let's give a try to the update in intrepid
** Attachment added: debdiff for the intrepid sru upload
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21562080/gvfs.debdiff
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for
** Attachment added: really the debdiff and not the diffstat now
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21562130/gvfs.debdiff
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a
Sebastien: the gvfs upstream patch requires an additional nautilus patch to
work properly in intrepid and hardy, otherways browsing smb will look like a
regression.
This is described in comments #47 to #50 of the upstream bug report:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c50
--
thank you for your comment, see bug #251809 for the nautilus update
which has been uploaded before this one and which has the required
changes too
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug
Sebastien, thanks for the backports. I looked at the gvfs change (ugh,
big patch), and this looks weird:
+--- trunk/daemon/smb-browse.mount.in 2009/01/06 10:20:24 2157
trunk/daemon/smb-browse.mount.in 2009/01/06 15:17:21 2158
+@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
+ Type=smb-network;smb-server
+
the automount change is required, one thing which change now that the
backend is handling authentification is that calls can take a while,
without this change gnome-panel which is doing sync call would block
when bookmarks are not responding
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines
Accepted gvfs into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback
here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Tags
I've got proposed enabled in my sources.list. When I run sudo aptitude
-t intrepid-proposed I don't see the new nautilus and gvfs packaging
after refreshing my package list. Do I need to wait longer for this to
hit the respositories?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:16:54PM -, NTolerance wrote:
I've got proposed enabled in my sources.list. When I run sudo aptitude
-t intrepid-proposed I don't see the new nautilus and gvfs packaging
after refreshing my package list. Do I need to wait longer for this to
hit the
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Hardy)
Target: None = ubuntu-8.04.3
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug
This appears to be fixed (finally) in Jaunty.
Thanks to everyone involved.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the
Please see the bug below showing similar behaviour on Intrepid, together
with some steps to isolate the problem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/316862
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
I have tested the new gvfs (1.1.3-0ubuntu1) and nautilus (1:2.25.2-0ubuntu4)
packages in a virtual machine installed from the latest jaunty live-cd.
I found no problems inside my AD network. It works well in all the cases
described in the original bug submission.
--
nautilus does not display
** Tags added: qa-jaunty-desktop
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.
--
desktop-bugs mailing
FAJALOU [2009-01-08 0:27 -]:
Thanks Sebastien. Just as one final note... Will it come up in Hardy
backports... Or Intrepid only?
We definitively aim for hardy-proposed and then hardy-updates, so that
everyone will get it. Intrepid, too, of course.
--
nautilus does not display samba
This bug was fixed in the package gvfs - 1.1.3-0ubuntu1
---
gvfs (1.1.3-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* New upstream version:
- ftp: fix limited number of connections causes commands to fail
- trash: fix parallel build doesn't work
- trash: add trash::orig-path and
the issue has been fixed upstream now, the fixed version will be
uploaded to jaunty this week and backports will be considered once this
one has been tested and confirmed to work and not bring other issues
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
nautilus does not
Thanks Sebastien. Just as one final note... Will it come up in Hardy
backports... Or Intrepid only?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
The upstream developer Tomas Bzatek has committed a gvfs-smb-browse-
auth.patch to gvfs-1.1.3:
* daemon/gvfsbackendnetwork.c:
* daemon/gvfsbackendsmbbrowse.c:
* daemon/smb-browse.mount.in:
SMB browsing authentication support (#524485)
Make smb-browse
Agreed... How easily will it be able to upgrade to this newest Gnome
version... Especially in Hardy :\ I have wanted to do this before, but
have never found decent instructions on how to do that... however, I
recognize that this (a bug report) is not the best place to discuss
this?
--
nautilus
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.
Renzo,
Thanks for the reply. I completely missed 54-57 and they helped much. Just
as a note in case someone else runs into this:
I downloaded the source which placed a folder called gvfs-0.2.5. Then
moved to ~/gvfs-0.2.5/daemon/ folder and downloaded and saved the patched
titled patch to
I agree with John; I have no idea how to apply the patch, but would love
to know how, anyone help? 8.04.1 here. Thanks
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 16:44, FAJALOU cunninghamlo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with John; I have no idea how to apply the patch, but would love
to know how, anyone help? 8.04.1 here. Thanks
JT - Yeah. I figured out why everyone ignored me. Apparently Linux has
this nice little command
Please, read comments 54 to 57, they already contain instructions on how to
apply a patch and to compile packages from source.
You can use these instructions to apply the latest patches which were made
upstream for gvfs and nautilus.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines
I have been researching this and trying to figure out how to apply the
patch that has been mentioned above that includes authentication in
browsing of shares.
So the way to apply this patch is this:
sudo patch [options]file-to-be-patched patch-file-from-launchpad
I need to know the file that is
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.
There is now an upstream near-final patch for gvfs that is working well in
intrepid and which does not have the problems with unreachable bookmarks. It
requires an additional small patch to nautilus to work properly, though.
Details may be found at the upstream bug report (starting from comment
If you compile gvfs yourself it works again. Let's hope it will be
intregrated to the ubuntu repo soon.
Am Donnerstag, den 04.12.2008, 17:09 + schrieb Renzo Bagnati:
There is now an upstream near-final patch for gvfs that is working well in
intrepid and which does not have the problems
So it sounds like this is working in both Hardy, and Intrepid... Will it
come out for Hardy too, because it is also an issue still in Hardy, and
I know that it was being worked on under Hardy in the Gnome bug. It's
almost there.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = In
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
