I finally managed to write an Intrepid Alpha 5 CD that would boot for me
and tested this.
As far as I can tell the seeks are now much more accurate (or at least
consistent). I was unable to produce any obvious discrepancies. Once I
upgrade to Intrepid proper I will be able to do more exhaustive
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The issue that you reported is one that should be
reproducible with the live environment of the Desktop CD of the
development release - Intrepid Ibex. It would help us greatly if you
could test with it so we can
A suitable file for reproducing this bug is available at
http://www.fysh.org/~mac/totem-
bug-527572.mp3 .
I've discovered that totem-xine is better at keeping the time code
accurate. It seems to be accurate to within half a second. This is still
worse than totem (standard) used to be under
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13342727/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13342728/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13342729/ProcStatus.txt
--
Totem:
