[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2013-03-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcc Importance: Unknown = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 Title: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly To manage

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-15 Thread Dave Martin
FIx confirmed in fixed in 4.4.2-5ubuntu1 -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-15 Thread Dave Martin
Thanks! -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-14 Thread Matthias Klose
fixed in 4.4.2-5ubuntu1 ** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package glib2.0 - 2.23.0-1ubuntu3 --- glib2.0 (2.23.0-1ubuntu3) lucid; urgency=low * Rebuild with gcc 4.4.2-5ubuntu1. LP: #491872. -- Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:57:11 + ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcc Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu. --

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-09 Thread Matthias Klose
confirmed, the testcase in the GCC testsuite still fails -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu. --

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu.

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
Unfortunately, the __sync_synchronize() bug appears still to be present in the updated GCC. A call to this intrinsic still disappears in the compiler's output. The __sync_lock_test_and_set() bug may still be present; however it is also possible that the __sync_synchronize() bug is masking the

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-08 Thread Dave Martin
-mimplicit-it=thumb does now seem to be passed correctly to the assembler, though: $ echo 'void f(void) { asm volatile(moveq r0, #1); }' | gcc -c -o tmp.o -xc - objdump -d tmp.o f: ... 4: bf08it eq 6: 2001moveq r0, #1 -- [armel] Atomic

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-08 Thread Matthias Klose
according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.4/4.4.2-3ubuntu2/+build/1378632 the patch (attached here is well) is applied. I'll update it to include the testcase, which I missed in the backport. -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-04 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu.

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gcc-4.4 - 4.4.2-3ubuntu2 --- gcc-4.4 (4.4.2-3ubuntu2) lucid; urgency=low * Update to SVN 20091203 from the gcc-4_4-branch (r154951), Fixes: PR middle-end/42049, PR c++/42234, PR fortran/41278. * PR target/42263, fix wrong code bugs in SMP

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-03 Thread Alexander Sack
milestoning glib part for alpha-3 so this comes back and we remember to verify that a respin has happened after gcc is fixed. ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-03 Thread Alexander Sack
confirming gcc issue. and tentatively putting on alpha-3 milestone. Not sure how to proceed. If its not known upstream we should probably file a bug there etc. Leaving to doko to drive this bug. ** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-03 Thread Dave Martin
I expect to be able to post a patch soon; it may be simplest to leave this unfixed until then. -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-03 Thread Dave Martin
This patch should fix the issue with __sync_lock_release(): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00198.html The __sync_synchronize() is not fixed by this— another patch should follow soon. -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-03 Thread Dave Martin
This patch should fix the __sync_synchronize() issue, by making sure GCC does not optimise away the call to the libgcc function which implements this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg00600.html These should now be fixed on the GCC trunk and await backporting to the upstream 4.4

[Bug 491872] Re: [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly

2009-12-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcc Status: Unknown = In Progress -- [armel] Atomic intrinsics are not implemented correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in ubuntu. --