Agreed/Ditto. I've pretty much given up on it. The best solution I've
found is to set up shortcuts to every share I use, since browsing is
pretty much impossible. This isn't really Ubuntu's fault since it is a
problem with an upstream vendor, but it's a bit ridiculous that this bug
has been know
I've noticed a couple of other things...
As said earlier- you can mount a share if you use Places = Connect to
server and then use an actual share name. There is no way to browse
shares through Nautilus. This is a real pain if you have a large network
with lots of servers and shares.
After
@pvanderploeg
I hadn't tried not including a username. My experience with Windows
shares anyway is that I have to include both a username and domain name-
or I don't get prompted for a password and get locked out of the domain
(by Active Directory).
The problem is the same on my home Samba
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None = gvfs
--
Can no longer access Samba (Windows) shares with latest updates.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209894
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu.
--
I wanted to chime in since I opened a similar bug that apparently got
deleted as a dupe...
For me, the situation is this:
Prior to Hardy, I could browse my corporate Active Directory SMB shares
using Nautilus. I was prompted for my login and password if I hadn't
previously accessed a share,
Quick clarification:
This problem only seems to apply to authenticated SMB shares. Shares
that do not require authentication work fine.
--
SMB error: Unable to mount location
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209520
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
Probably related: The same problem happens in the AVN trash applet. It
always shows empty, even when trash is full. Clicking on it opens the
appropriate (full) trash folder, but it claims No Items in Trash.
--
Trash always empty.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34247
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
Realized this because a couple of Java HTML authoring apps I used
stopped working as of this week (unable to access Web servers via
SFTP)...
I cannot connect to SFTP/SSH resources through Nautilus. I suspect this
is similar to the problems reported
Sorry, obviously the title should have Nautilus in it.
--
SSH/SFTP Not Working in Nauilus (Another GVFS Problem?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs
Terminal connection:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting to www.mydomain.com...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
sftp
Gvfs-mount:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log$ gvfs-mount sftp://www.mydomain.com
Added new job source 0x642820 (GVfsBackendSftp)
Queued new job 0x643830
Please delete.
While I am having issues with Java apps, this particular issue seems to
have been a transient network issue. I'll pursue things from the Java
end...
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
SSH/SFTP Not Working in Nauilus (Another GVFS Problem?)
I can't say how to dupe it using Samba shares, but I believe Tien's
suggestion of using security=share would do it.
Any share requiring authentication should cause this problem to occur.
Nautilus won't prompt for credentials, and displays a blank folder when
one tries to access a share. In
Sorry, you are correct. While it appears to be related, and started
occurring with the gvfs authentication issue, it is not the exact same
problem.
--
SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209520
You received this bug
I had a hard time collecting all the dependencies and getting autogen to
work, but after about an hour of Googling and tinkering I was finally
able to get it the patched version of gvfsd-smb-browse compiled and
installed. I'm sure just getting the binary posted here would have
worked fine, but I
I guess I should have mentioned the other reason I didn't use the binary
posted earlier- I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu.
I need to compile it on another machine, so I will try to better
document the packages and steps I used to get the compile to work. I'll
post that here when I can. Unfortunately
@Renzo-
Couldn't have said it better myself. Somewhere along the line- I missed
the build-dep command. I was able to compile it, but it took close to
an hour to track down all the dependencies by hand. Thanks for posting
this.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS
I followed Renzo's instructions and the two problems I reported earlier
have gone away. There were obviously some dependencies I missed the
first time. It accesses my keyring now once I have saved my login, and
opens the server when I double-click on it.
To clarify his steps for anyone new:
To
Unfortunately a gvfs update hit the repositories in the last couple of
days. This fixed my patched version, and the version in the
repositories is still broken. I can't believe this is taking this long
to fix.
I'm not blacklisting gvfs from updates because I keep hoping it will get
fixed, but for
This whole mess is actually WORSE in Intrepid right now. In Hardy, there
was at least the option of manually attaching to the share using the
Connect to server... dialog. That doesn't work in Intrepid.(!) One
gets the usual errant Cannot display location... error message, but it
shows up in Places
Just throwing in a ditto here and subscribing...
This seems to be similar to a bug that started with Hardy, only now it
is worse. With Hardy- while you couldn't browse shares through Nautilus,
you could manually mount them using the Connect to Server... dialog in
Places. You would get an error
I installed Debian Etch on a test machine, and this problem doesn't
exist. Either they figured out how to fix it, or they didn't use the
same buggy gvfs implementation that Ubuntu is. I haven't tried a from
scratch install of Intrepid, but I do know the two machines I ran a
distro-upgrade on to
Sort-of the Microsoft philosophy on operating systems- if you don't like
our shiny new broken one- please feel free to use the old rusty one that
still has the feature(s) you need...
Seriously though- anything from upstream on this yet? It's been 6+
months, and there have certainly been enough
Sebastien-
If you are referring to my earlier comment- I apologize. I very much
appreciate ALL of the work that the volunteer developers and organizers
put into Ubuntu. Without all of you, Ubuntu wouldn't happen, and I'm
pretty sure we all realize this. My frustration lies in the fact that
this
@dawinkley: You'd have to do a 'sudo chmod' command, it is very unlikely
that is related to the problem itself, and it is always a very-bad idea
to mess with file permissions on system-created files like this. You
would likely create a stability or security issue.
--
Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access
@Peter van Heun: Is the server/share you are having trouble with
requiring authentication? That's where this problem creeps up. It
(Nautilus/gvfs) works just fine on open shares, but anything requiring
authentication will fail (and in an MS ADS network- will generally get
your account locked-out).
Sorry- I just realized this was a different bug than the one I actually
meant to look up. Windows AD shares work fine now, but I don't use
password-protected SMB shares, so I can't actually confirm that this
exact bug is fixed. Sorry for the confusion.
--
smb password protected share cannot be
This appears to be fixed (finally) in Jaunty.
Thanks to everyone involved.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the
I just installed Jaunty on a test machine, and the Network browser
works!!!
uPnP devices show up, and if I click on an MS-AD resource- it prompts me
for my login credentials (just like way back in Gutsy).
So- it appears this whole mess is finally fixed in Jaunty.
Thank you to everyone who
I did a fresh install of Karmic on my Dell Latitude and this problem
came up. I had a similar problem with my HP netbook. I had previously
done an upgrade install of Karmic and the Do Nothing option wasn't
removed from Power Management. It took me awhile to figure out why my
external monitor
I actually thought this had been resolved and closed years ago...
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:49, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
is that still an issue? comment #96 seems a specific smb limitation or
bug which might be different from this bug
--
You received
30 matches
Mail list logo
