[Bug 1903910] Re: Mouse settings ignored when plugging in a new mouse

2020-11-14 Thread Ben James
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1899509 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899509 > @Ben: Can you please install the mutter packages from this PPA I can confirm that the suggested package works - I've tried with multiple mice and all keep adopt the expected settings when I unplug and

[Bug 1903910] Re: Primary mouse button setting reverts to default

2020-11-11 Thread Ben James
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1899509 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899509 I can also confirm that gsettings shows the correct value when disconnecting the mouse, but when the mouse is reconnected, the setting is reverted silently (gsettings and gnome-control-center show the wrong

[Bug 1903910] Re: Primary mouse button setting reverts to default

2020-11-11 Thread Ben James
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1899509 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899509 After a bit more debug, it appears the problem occurs when any external mouse is disconnected and reconnected (ruling out the USB hub and switch as a factor). -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1903910] [NEW] Primary mouse button setting reverts to default

2020-11-11 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: I'm running Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on a Dell XPS 13 laptop with an external mouse and keyboard connected via a USB switch.* I've set the mouse to left-handed operation (i.e. primary mouse button = right) using gnome-control-center; this works fine for a while and shows the

[Bug 787475] Re: Rhythmbox [0.12.8] [0.12.5] Not Fetching Album Information From MusicBrainz

2011-09-27 Thread Ben James
I agree with Paul - it is a shame that it's taken so long to get this fix to end users. Don't get me wrong, I applaud the work of the open source community and have the greatest respect for those who give their time to support open projects, however I suspect the slow turn-around of this

[Bug 548754] Re: sshfs mounts cannot be written

2010-10-22 Thread Ben James
As this seems to be a problem with sshfs (rather than Nautilus) it makes sense to me for someone to forward this bug up-stream and get the sshfs guys looking at it. Pedro: Can you reassign this to the sshfs guys? Thanks. -- sshfs mounts cannot be written https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548754

[Bug 327785] Re: keyword fork not formatted in Verliog mode.

2010-09-15 Thread Ben James
This bug can probably be closed - I've recently submitted a new Verilog language definition file which has been added to the gtksourceview repository. Ref: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628246 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #628246

[Bug 230987] Re: Gedit changes highlight mode to c if there's a block comment a the start of the file

2010-08-24 Thread Ben James
How do I add/enable support for SystemVerilog syntax highlighting? I have the latest version of gedit with libgtksourceview2.0-0 installed, but there is no option for SystemVerilog. Has the syntax highlighting you added been integrated up-stream? I'm very interested in having my favourite

[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

2010-06-14 Thread Ben James
Can I suggest that, in order to cut down spam on this bug, somebody formulates a list of, say, 20 known failure cases (with links to the appropriate video/game/advert/whatever) and this is used to confirm the validity of a fix on any given platform. Hopefully this can help prevent some of the

[Bug 577501] Re: FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget

2010-05-25 Thread Ben James
The author has fixed the issue and added a new link to the plug-ins page. ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 577766] Re: SplitView - error on disabling plugin

2010-05-19 Thread Ben James
Yes, sorry for posting here. I posted here because the plug-in is listed on the gedit plug-ins page. Thanks for taking the time to look at this (even though the source is not directly part of gedit). -- SplitView - error on disabling plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577766 You received

[Bug 577501] Re: FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget

2010-05-09 Thread Ben James
I just noticed that the importance was changed to low - which may very well be correct, but I thought I'd reiterate that the plugin doesn't work on my system (i.e. the bug title may be slightly misleading). -- FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577501

[Bug 577766] [NEW] SplitView - error on disabling plugin

2010-05-09 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit When disabling the SplitView plugin I see the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/user/.gnome2/gedit/plugins/SplitView.py, line 456, in deactivate self.instances[window].deactivate() File

[Bug 577766] Re: SplitView - error on disabling plugin

2010-05-09 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48112859/Dependencies.txt -- SplitView - error on disabling plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in

[Bug 577766] Re: SplitView - error on disabling plugin

2010-05-09 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: SplitView plugin http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48113035/SplitView2.01.tar.gz -- SplitView - error on disabling plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit

[Bug 577501] [NEW] FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget

2010-05-08 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit Installing the FindInDocuments and launching gedit on the command line gives the following warnings: /home/user/.gnome2/gedit/plugins/FindInDocuments.py:118: DeprecationWarning: Use the new widget gtk.Tooltip tooltips = gtk.Tooltips()

[Bug 577501] Re: FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget

2010-05-08 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Plugin files. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48068608/FindInDocuments_plugin2.tar.gz -- FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 577501] Re: FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget

2010-05-08 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48068386/Dependencies.txt -- FindInDocument plugin uses deprecated widget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 548754] [NEW] sshfs mounts cannot be written

2010-03-26 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When attempting to overwrite existing files on an sshfs mount point nautilus fails - stating that it is unable to rename temporary the file. I imagine this relates to the way in which nautilus overwrites files - writing the data to a

[Bug 548754] Re: sshfs mounts cannot be written

2010-03-26 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42048030/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42048031/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt

[Bug 514863] Re: Totem ignores window_on_top gconf key

2010-01-31 Thread Ben James
Should the gconf key not set the plug-in to be active? The original point of the bug was that the gconf key window_on_top does nothing; regardless of the mechanism used under the hood (be it a built-in function, a plug-in or a wint to the window manager) this key should do something - at the

[Bug 514863] [NEW] Totem ignores window_on_top gconf key

2010-01-30 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem - Description: Totem Movie Player 2.28.2 ignores the setting window_on_top - set in Configuration Editor 2.28.0. - System: Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala). Totem version:

[Bug 421489] Re: Glitch when switching between items in compact view.

2009-08-31 Thread Ben James
Up-stream bug opened: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593622 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #593622 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593622 -- Glitch when switching between items in compact view. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421489 You received this bug

[Bug 421489] [NEW] Glitch when switching between items in compact view.

2009-08-30 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Details: If Compact View mode is selected, and the item names in the current folder exceed the width of the nautilus window, when the user moves between items (up/down arrow) there is a glitch as the folder items are redrawn. I suspect the folder contents are first

[Bug 420252] [NEW] [nautilussvn] Is there any documentation?

2009-08-27 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: I tried to submit this under nautilussvn, however Launchpad refuses to accept this as a valid package name - even when searching and suggesting it itself! I've just installed nautilussvn and am having serious problems getting it to do anything - this is exacerbated by the

[Bug 252449] Re: No automatic syntax highlighting

2009-06-19 Thread Ben James
Until highlighting is automatic (if the gedit developers intend to make it automatic that is), you can always manually select the source highlight mode thus: View | Highlight Mode | Scripts | PHP It has been noted that this is fixed on Jaunty, therefore you might want to upgrade or see if

[Bug 252449] Re: No automatic syntax highlighting

2009-06-19 Thread Ben James
Interesting. gedit will apply syntax highlighting automatically to files with an expected file extension - for example file.php _should_ be highlighted based on PHP language elements. Is it the case that your files do not have a .php extension and the other files you mention do? I can't see any

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-04-18 Thread Ben James
Upstream (feature request) bug opened here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579427 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #579427 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579427 -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-04-17 Thread Ben James
I'll give it a day and open an upstream bug if no-one responds. -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 336334] [NEW] F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-03-01 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot A number of F-Spot operations cause a heavy CPU load: importing images, adjusting sharpness, etc - these operations should be multi-threaded to better utilise multi-core CPUs. Furthermore, the GUI thread should not itself perform any image

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-03-01 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Performing graphical operations in the GUI thread is suspected of causing this. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23265045/Screenshot-F-Spot.png -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 332723] [NEW] [eog] SVG rendering bug.

2009-02-21 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: The attached SVG is not rendered correctly by EOG. Open the image in Firefox or Inkscape for a reference rendering. Also, why does EOG not use the same SVG rendering library that Firefox does? Do there need to be multiple SVG rendering libraries, some of which that

[Bug 332723] Re: [eog] SVG rendering bug.

2009-02-21 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: SVG file showing rendering bug (see text A0A1') http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22961012/rendering_bug.svg -- [eog] SVG rendering bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 332723] Re: [eog] SVG rendering bug (librsvg).

2009-02-21 Thread Ben James
** Summary changed: - [eog] SVG rendering bug. + [eog] SVG rendering bug (librsvg). ** Description changed: - - The attached SVG is not rendered correctly by EOG. Open the image in Firefox or Inkscape for a reference rendering. + The attached SVG is not rendered correctly by EOG. Open the

[Bug 252449] Re: No automatic syntax highlighting

2009-02-19 Thread Ben James
I've not seen the Jaunty release, so the following is just a suggestion. Syntax highlighting should be based on the file mime type - likewise when the syntax highlighting is changed the user should be prompted and asked if they want to update the file type (such that the syntax highlighting will

[Bug 252449] Re: No automatic syntax highlighting

2009-02-19 Thread Ben James
I've marked the following a duplicate of this bug: #22 -- No automatic syntax highlighting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 229999] Re: gedit doesnt automatically syntax highlight .f Fortran files

2009-02-19 Thread Ben James
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 252449 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252449 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 252449 No automatic syntax highlighting -- gedit doesnt automatically syntax highlight .f Fortran files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22 You received

[Bug 327785] [NEW] [gedit] keyword fork not formatted in Verliog mode.

2009-02-10 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit When using Verilog highlight mode, the keyword fork is not correctly formatted. To reproduce, simply open gedit, type fork and set to Verilog highlight mode (View | Highlight Mode | Sources | Verilog). ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu)

[Bug 327785] Re: [gedit] keyword fork not formatted in Verliog mode.

2009-02-10 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Note that fork is not auto-formatted. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22466437/gedit_format_bug.png -- [gedit] keyword fork not formatted in Verliog mode. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 315830] [NEW] Broken keyboard shortcuts on Sony Vaio VGN-NS10J/S

2009-01-10 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: System: Ubuntu 8.10 (AMD64) on Sony Vaio VGN-NS10J/S. - uname -a: Linux newton 2.6.27-9-generic #1 SMP Thu Nov 20 22:15:32 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[Bug 315830] Re: Broken keyboard shortcuts on Sony Vaio VGN-NS10J/S

2009-01-10 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Example of (2) - suspend key set. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21087671/suspend_key_set.png -- Broken keyboard shortcuts on Sony Vaio VGN-NS10J/S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 315830] Re: Broken keyboard shortcuts on Sony Vaio VGN-NS10J/S

2009-01-10 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Example of (2) - suspend action set. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21087676/suspend_action_set.png -- Broken keyboard shortcuts on Sony Vaio VGN-NS10J/S https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 272971] Re: Dock windows dangle when the panel autohides

2009-01-04 Thread Ben James
Move mouse over icon, wait one second, tooltip pops up, e.g. Master: 84%, then scroll to change volume. -- Dock windows dangle when the panel autohides https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 272971] Re: Dock windows dangle when the panel autohides

2009-01-03 Thread Ben James
Hovering the mouse over the applet icon shows a tool-tip, scrolling the mouse (actually laptop touchpad) causes the volume to change as expected (the tooltip is updated when I scroll). -- Dock windows dangle when the panel autohides https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272971 You received this bug

[Bug 295893] Re: Missing drive?

2008-11-28 Thread Ben James
I've tried this a few times in the last few minutes and I've not managed to reproduce the bug. It looks like a race condition. -- Missing drive? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

[Bug 295893] Re: Missing drive?

2008-11-09 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: mount mount http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19506914/mount -- Missing drive? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 295893] [NEW] Missing drive?

2008-11-09 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Fresh install of Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) does not correctly show all drives. The drive list (left panel of nautilus) has a blank entry - see screenshot. uname -a: Linux einstein 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Tue Nov 4 19:33:20 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Nautilus version:

[Bug 295893] Re: Missing drive?

2008-11-09 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Missing drive screenshot. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19506913/missing_drive_bug.png -- Missing drive? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

[Bug 295893] Re: Missing drive?

2008-11-09 Thread Ben James
I have not managed to recreate this bug - which suggests it may be a race condition. I have only seen this problem once, when using the file chooser under ndisgtk (Nautilus has not shown this issue). Thank you for reassigning this bug. -- Missing drive? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295893

[Bug 293857] Re: Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-07 Thread Ben James
Bug report script output attached as requested. ** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.sh result. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19465684/gpm.log -- Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293857 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 293857] Re: Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-07 Thread Ben James
I should add that I have seen this occur only once (since the 8.10 official release) - if it occurs again I'll update the report and try and add more information. -- Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293857 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 293860] [NEW] Volume applet does not defocus in Ubuntu 8.10.

2008-11-04 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-volume-manager See attached screenshot. The gnome-volume-manager applet does not defocus even when another item gains focus - i.e. when the volume slider has been displayed it only clears when the volume icon is clicked a second time (it should

[Bug 293860] Re: Volume applet does not defocus in Ubuntu 8.10.

2008-11-04 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: volume_control_bug.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19356200/volume_control_bug.png -- Volume applet does not defocus in Ubuntu 8.10. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 293857] [NEW] Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-04 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: See attached screenshot. The gnome-power-manager applet displays a Cannot get panel brightness warning icon. The panel brightness can still be modified. OS: Ubuntu 8.10 gnome-power-manager: 2.24.0 uname -a: Linux newton 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Thu Oct 30 04:18:38 UTC 2008

[Bug 293857] Re: Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-04 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: screen_brightness_bug.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19356098/screen_brightness_bug.png -- Cannot get panel brightness in Ubuntu 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 262410] [NEW] Possible rendering bug

2008-08-28 Thread Ben James
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince There is a possible rendering bug in evince. I cannot confirm that the source file is not corrupt, however here are the details: Source file: The Principles of Beautiful Web Design Render bug: Figure 1.30 Download location:

[Bug 262410] Re: Possible rendering bug

2008-08-28 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: design1-sample.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17147948/design1-sample.pdf ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17147949/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17147950/ProcMaps.txt **

RE: [Bug 262410] Re: Possible rendering bug

2008-08-28 Thread Ben James
Page 31, figure 1.30 - see attachment. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:11:11 + Subject: [Bug 262410] Re: Possible rendering bug with wich page are you having issues? it seems to renders fine for me, thanks you. -- Possible rendering bug