quote who=Emmanuele Bassi
Unfortunately, when importing the GtkRecent API in GTK+ I made a mistake
and these two functions have been erroneously left inside the
GtkRecentChooser interface API:
Hi Emmanuele,
This might be appropriate for devel-announce-list, maybe even in preference
to
* Jul 12 02:21 Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
* gnome-power-manager
* Tomboy
* Gtk#
What about libnotify? It was proposed for 2.14 but rejected because of
lack
On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 23:17 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
Hi all
There was interesting discussion tonight on #g-h, so here I'll give
some summary and ask an advice:
As some of you might be aware, libgswitchit and libkbdaw are virtual
modules included into gnome-control-center and
I'm concerned about the inclusion of GTK# - and hence all the rest of Mono into
the core GNOME.
It's been mentioned many times before that we already have too many component
models in the GNOME platform - and once they are in there, it's VERY hard to get
them back out again - just look at Bonobo.
On dim, 2006-07-09 at 23:17 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
I see the Ben's point but I have strong concern that solutions like
this could easily make GNOME any distrobuilder's nightmare.
So here is the question: would gnome build process stand 2(!!!) new
TINY(!) libraries - or is there
On 7/10/06, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeType-2.1.x contains libttf.so as well as libfreetype.so. See Fedora
4 5.
In version 2.2.x, the true type font stuff has been incorporated into
libfreetype and libttf.so has been eliminated.
Thats entirely a fedora packaging
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 12:48 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
OK... Which leads us back to my original comment that apps that are
linked against libttf.so need to be rebuilt.
Still no. Even rpms built using it don't need to be rebuilt, as rpms
depend on /usr/lib/libtts.so.*, not the
On 7/12/06, Robert Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:16 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
* gnome-power-manager
* Tomboy
* Gtk#
* nm-applet
The
On 7/12/06, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006, at 08:56, Johan Svedberg wrote:
* Jul 12 02:21 Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
*
On 7/11/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per suggestion at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-June/msg00071.html,
here's some loud complaining about 2.15.4 brokenness (taken from an
email from Vincent, except I've added some new notes and probably made
things
Hello Simos
Personally I am against flags being used to indicate the language your
keyboard is set to write.
I thouht it was already discussed. GNOME does not officially support
flags and has no stardard functionality of that kind - so you do not
have to convince me. But the amount of people
On 7/12/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, since it isn't going away, if you
allow this to happen to you, you will be publicly shamed on d-d-l, and
maybe even beaten with half a pair of virtual pants. You don't want
that to happen.
I don't know if it is easy to make make
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 12:07 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
FreeType-2.1.x contains libttf.so as well as libfreetype.so. See Fedora
4 5.
In version 2.2.x, the true type font stuff has been incorporated into
libfreetype and libttf.so has been eliminated.
No, you are wrong. The
Darren Kenny wrote:
Is there a definition of that is acceptable as a core GNOME application - other
than it's based on consensus? I think we are badly in need of a definition that
defines the needs of the core GNOME Desktop?
There is no doubt we need to establish a definition of what
On 7/10/06, Sergey Udaltsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flags !!! I knew it.
There will always be a way to allow users to indicate layouts using
flags (as long as I maintain GNOME xkb indicator at least). It can be
hidden, non-documented, whatever (so GNOME would not take political
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:34 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
+ looks like we'll need a new gnome-mag release since LT_VERSION is
wrong (Frederic knows more about this)
The new release can be downloaded in
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-mag/0.13/
Best regards,
--
Carlos Eduardo
Let's cc d-d-l. Please, everyone, let's make our lifes easier for the
next release... I don't have any real figures, but a bunch of modules
was released late, which is not helping for smoketesting.
Le mardi 11 juillet 2006, à 17:55, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hey there,
In case somebody else
Another issue:
gnome-icon-theme-2.15.3 requires icon-naming-utils 0.7.3,
which is nowhere to be found...
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Another issue:
+ at-spi 1.7.8 shipped without translations. This has been
happening to lots of modules in past releases (and may have happened
to other modules in this release; haven't checked close enough), and
still doesn't seem to be going away. Note that the most likely cause
of
Which still points at Fedora. On other distros that don't do this, those
apps don't need to be rebuilt. On Debian, for example, libttf.so is in a
separate package anyway. Please take this to Fedora's bugzilla.
-- dobey
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 12:48 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
OK...
[I'm certain this isn't the correct list for administrivia, but I'm on
the road and it's hard to interpolate what a better choice would have
been. Apologies]
We have a module whose name was renamed before it was released for the
first time but after it started life in CVS. As we're about to
It looks like your LINGUAS file is in the toplevel directory, and not in
po/. This is most likely the cause. :)
-- dobey
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:40 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
Another issue:
+ at-spi 1.7.8 shipped without translations. This has been
happening to lots of modules in
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 20:31, Rodney Dawes wrote:
It looks like your LINGUAS file is in the toplevel directory, and not in
po/. This is most likely the cause. :)
Indeed.
thanks Rodney, fixed in cvs. I'll re-roll now.
Bill
-- dobey
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:40 +0100, Bill Haneman
Hi Bill,
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:40 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
Another issue:
+ at-spi 1.7.8 shipped without translations. This has been
happening to lots of modules in past releases (and may have happened
to other modules in this release; haven't checked close enough), and
still
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:16 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
And the big question: We currently allow desktop modules to depend on
the pygtk bindings, but no others. Should we extend that to include
the gtk# ones (assuming, of course, that gtk# is added to the bindings set)?
IMO we should
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:34 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
+ gnome-session requires a new gnome-control-center. New
gnome-control-center means that we should use libxklavier 2.91. Which
means that we need a new gnome-applets release. Yay for API changes
:-)
(AFAIK, maintainers are
On 7/12/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/06, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006, at 08:56, Johan Svedberg wrote:
* Jul 12 02:21 Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
*
gnome-vfsmm-2.14.0 does not build under 2.15.4.
-Joseph
--
joseph_sacco [at] comcast [dot] net
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Elijah Newren wrote:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
* gnome-power-manager
* Tomboy
* Gtk#
Yay, I have no clue, Yay, Yay, and Yay, respectively.
There's one additional issue to address as well:
* Okay to have desktop modules depend on gtk# bindings?
The argument
Turns out to be caused by the bonobo changes in gnome-vfs-2.15.3
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-July/msg00032.html
-Joseph
=
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 20:57 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D.
On 10/07/06, Sergey Udaltsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Annoying. What we do? We set a fixed width.
Of course. Even if we adopt two-letter code, we won't adopt fixed
font. So the actual width of the string cannot be guaranteed eather
way.
I think the point here is that you know what names are
31 matches
Mail list logo
