Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.16.2 Stable Release

2006-11-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 20 novembre 2006, à 23:29, Davyd Madeley a écrit : On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 14:23 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Tarballs are due on Monday November 20th before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.16.2 Stable Release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. I apologise, but the gnome-applets

Re: Announcing GNOME Network Proxy Resolver

2006-11-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006, à 14:03, Elijah Newren a écrit : On 10/25/06, Alexey Rusakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bastien Nocera wrote: GNOME Network Proxy Resolver provides proxy lookup with PAC support via DBUS. This allows other programmes to support the Automatic proxy configuration

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. GtkUnique is

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 14 novembre 2006, à 11:56, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : Hi all; as some maintainers of GNOME modules have expressed their interest in using GtkUnique[1] as a dependency for their applications, I'd like to officially propose it as a blessed external dependency for GNOME. GtkUnique is

Re: Announcing GNOME Network Proxy Resolver

2006-11-22 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mercredi 22 novembre 2006 à 21:03 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : So, hmm, just pinging: Christian, are you willing to propose this for 2.18, or do you think it's too early? GNPR itself is ready, but since it's useless without gnome-vfs making use of it

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Havoc Pennington
Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by. Havoc ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Andre Klapper
hejhej, Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170782 , i'd say. :-)

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Havoc Pennington
Andre Klapper wrote: hejhej, Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but I didn't see it go by.

Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.16.2 Stable Release

2006-11-22 Thread Brian Cameron
Vincent: Apologies, but gdm 2.16.3 release was a bit late also. It would be nice if the version released today could also be included in the 2.16.2 Stable Release if possible. Brian Tarballs are due on Monday November 20th before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.16.2 Stable Release, which will be

Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.16.2 Stable Release

2006-11-22 Thread Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D.
GARNOME-2.16.2 will include gdm-2.16.3. -Joseph = On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 14:53 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: Vincent: Apologies, but gdm 2.16.3 release was a bit late also. It would be nice if the version released today could also be

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Vytautas Liuolia
Indeed, but it doesn't mention GtkUnique (i.e. there's no API proposal on there) Maybe gtk-devel is a more appropriate place to start than bugzilla, I don't know. But the point is, if nobody proposes the API for gtk and gets feedback on it from gtk maints then it's pretty much known it

Re: Announcing GNOME Network Proxy Resolver

2006-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:03 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006, à 14:03, Elijah Newren a écrit : snip So, hmm, just pinging: Christian, are you willing to propose this for 2.18, or do you think it's too early? There's currently nothing using it, so there's not much of a point.

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:51 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote: Andre Klapper wrote: hejhej, Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 15:28 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: Should also get a gtk bug open for it asap so it can start evolving toward gtk inclusion, no? Maybe there already is one but

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
hi Vincent; thanks for the reminder. :-) On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:12 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: 1. Get this in a GTK+ release we can ship with GNOME 2.18 2. Bless GtkUnique as an external dependency 3. Include the code in the modules that want to use it for now (while waiting for a

Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

2006-11-22 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
hi Vincent; On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:13 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: GtkUnique is now hosted on GNOME CVS under the gtkunique module[2] and if needed I'll also request a Bugzilla product for it; I can commit it to API+ABI freeze after the 1.0 release - which should happen as soon as the