Bastien Nocera hadess at hadess.net writes:
Heya,
I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
snip..
We're also looking into integrating Frank Scholz' UPNP sharing work (see
http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/Nautilus).
This would be really cool, especially if it
2008/10/28 Johannes Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
So after I finally got to read
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore and
vuntz blogpost I was wondering if there is already a place where the
prototyping of the new panel is happening. I guess quite some people
Ysgrifennodd John Stowers:
Personally I would not be sad if AWN were to replace gnome-panel all
together (in the default install), but thats a story for another day.
I really like AWN. I'd love if we could use it or some of it.
Bikeshed: are we calling this gnome-shell after all? Maybe we
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 13:22 +, Frej Soya wrote:
Bastien Nocera hadess at hadess.net writes:
Heya,
I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
snip..
We're also looking into integrating Frank Scholz' UPNP sharing work (see
Maybe we could call it nemo after the captain of the Nautilus.
AWESOME NAME
K,
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hello,
Supersonic Imagine Software Team is proud to announce it's first
product, the diagnostic ultrasound system Aixplorer NewWave, and we
want to thank you for your contributions to our system and to know your
work is contributing to the diagnosis of cancer.
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 03:06 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
2008/10/24 Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 21:11 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
why a web server is needed for sharing files.
WebDAV is
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
SVN. AFAIK both git and bazaar have very strong supporters in our
community so the
Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote:
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
SVN. AFAIK both git and bazaar have very strong
Thomas Thurman wrote:
Ysgrifennodd John Stowers:
Personally I would not be sad if AWN were to replace gnome-panel
all together (in the default install), but thats a story for
another day.
I really like AWN. I'd love if we could use it or some of it.
Bikeshed: are we calling this
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:45 -0400, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Sandy Armstrong:
Thomas Thurman wrote:
Bikeshed: are we calling this gnome-shell after all? Maybe we could
call it nemo after the captain of
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Zeeshan Ali Khattak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:24 +0200, Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote:
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
SVN. AFAIK both
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's a secret that I like one over the other, but I'd
rather either of them than sticking with svn.
Same feelings
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we
already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that.
I think the vote should be down to the foundation members.
I actually think that, if any, the vote should be
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:00 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:45 -0400, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Sandy Armstrong:
Thomas Thurman wrote:
Bikeshed: are we calling this gnome-shell
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:24 +0200, Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote:
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request.
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
[...]
bkor isnt the only sysadmin, but who are the others and how much do
they do.. the whole sysadmin process is not very transparent.
Shouldn't it be? I would *love* to help out the sysadmins, maybe even
offer them some of my time. Where
Hi,
John Carr wrote:
I think the vote should be down to the foundation members.
I think module maintainers (some of whom aren't even foundation members)
is a better electorate. I for one have not been a regular developer
for quite some time wouldn't have anything useful to contribute to the
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008, à 15:20 +, Karl Lattimer a écrit :
Columbiad - the cannon from the book From earth to the moon ?
Interesting -- I had the same proposal :-)
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Red October seems appropriate as the project will eventually surrender
itself for reimplementation ;)
Red October GNOME?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/1999-October/msg00020.html
-- Dan
___
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Zeeshan Ali Khattak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
Le lundi 27 octobre 2008, à 16:58 -0700, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
Hi!
So after I finally got to read
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore and
vuntz blogpost I was wondering if there is already a place where the
prototyping of the new panel is happening. I
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we
already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that.
I think the vote should be down to the foundation members.
I actually think that, if
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:24 +0200, Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote:
Hi everyone!
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
SVN. AFAIK both
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know if you read Owen's post, which talks about how this could be
implemented:
http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/10/22/implementing-the-next-gnome-shell/
I guess we'll have stuff in a svn module as soon as there's
Ysgrifennodd Richard Hughes:
I've tried bazaar, but it was too slow, and
Please, can we not rehash all the Bazaar was too slow back when I tried
it in 1905! and git is so complicated you need a PhD in
torvaldsology! arguments in this thread? We've done them all a million
times already and
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:48 -0400, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Richard Hughes:
I've tried bazaar, but it was too slow, and
Please, can we not rehash all the Bazaar was too slow back when I tried
it in 1905! and git is so complicated you need a PhD in
torvaldsology! arguments in
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Karl Lattimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They both suck, lets use wizbit for a communally continuously syncing
DVCS-file-system where everyone can edit and never need to care about
pushing or pulling...
Lies! We should totally be using a shared DropBox account
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:55 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Karl Lattimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They both suck, lets use wizbit for a communally continuously syncing
DVCS-file-system where everyone can edit and never need to care about
pushing or pulling...
John Carr wrote:
1. I don't see any way of using git mirrors (don't know of bazaar) in
jhbuild setup.
Help wanted:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538507
I should really find some time to work on this; hopefully this
week-end.
Frederic
Hi,
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after
a vote we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and
vice verse. GNOME is by nature a distributed project with a lot of sub
modules, maintainers and thus preferences.
I personally think our time and
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Hi,
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after a
vote we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and vice
verse. GNOME is by nature a distributed project with a lot of sub
modules, maintainers and thus preferences.
I
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:55 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Hi,
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after
a vote we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and
vice verse. GNOME is by nature a distributed project with a lot of sub
modules,
On 28 Oct 2008, at 16:00, Vincent Untz wrote:
Don't know if you read Owen's post, which talks about how this could
be
implemented:
http://blog.fishsoup.net/2008/10/22/implementing-the-next-gnome-shell/
I guess we'll have stuff in a svn module as soon as there's proper
code
to show :-)
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Translations is often brought up as a tricky part for this, can we
handle them in a way where they are agnostic to the VCS system the
modules happen to be in.
We already have a lot of the logic; if you've got jhbuild set up,
jhbuild update MODULENAME will check out any
28 okt 2008 kl. 19.05 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Hi,
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even
after a
vote we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and
vice
verse. GNOME is by nature a distributed project with a lot of sub
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:55 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Lies! We should totally be using a shared DropBox account with all the
GNOME inside! ;)
Fall back to the BitKeeper effect[1]? No thanks.
Hub
[1] DropBox is not Free Software.
___
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:56 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:55 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Lies! We should totally be using a shared DropBox account with all the
GNOME inside! ;)
Fall back to the BitKeeper effect[1]? No thanks.
Spotting a joke fail.
:)
K,
2008/10/28 Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:55 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Hi,
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after
a vote we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and
vice verse. GNOME is by nature a distributed
Hi Calum,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we start as we hopefully mean to go on, by usability testing
mockups of some alternative shell/panel designs first, to figure out if
we're heading off in roughly the right direction before we even think
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:25 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi Calum,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we start as we hopefully mean to go on, by usability testing
mockups of some alternative shell/panel designs first, to figure out if
we're
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Can we get away from central hosting on gnome.org servers? Don't
know.
The big problem here is that you lose the ability for translators to
commit directly to your repo. Which pretty much is going
Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2008, 17:50 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
The big problem here is that you lose the ability for translators to
commit directly to your repo. Which pretty much is going to
Hello,
2008/10/28 Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after a vote
we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and vice verse.
GNOME is by nature a distributed project with a lot of sub modules,
maintainers and thus
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 23:23 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
Hello,
2008/10/28 Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after a vote
we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and vice verse.
GNOME is by nature a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:24:25PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote:
I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about
migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's
request. It's been some months since that and we are still stuck with
It wasn't delayed at
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we
already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that.
I think the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Ali Sabil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:18 AM, John Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Ali Sabil [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
personally think that keeping svn, and maintaining bzr-mirror, git-mirror,
and hopefully an hg-mirror would make everyone happy. All of bzr, hg and git
provide a mean to interop with svn, while there is not always a way to
50 matches
Mail list logo
