Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Travis Watkins
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Dylan McCall wrote: > Similarly, all sorts of applications choose to hide within the > notification area because they want to stay out of the user's way and > window managers fail to provide the necessary functionality themselves. > Thus, they take window managemen

Re: Adding module descriptions

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 20:55 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > The point is deps are not changed at random, the person merging code > changes is the best person to update build deps. This is unfortunately > not something you can always find in ChangeLog/NEWS. What about reminding maintainer

Re: Adding module descriptions

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 11:46 -0400, Owen Taylor a écrit : > B) Drop MAINTAINERS and move the information to the DOAP file. > (There would be some sort of transition period where we would > support both.) > > I like B) better; I'd rather one file than a collection of little files.

Re: How to remove remote branch with git?

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 22:28 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: > > > I just did my first commit with git (Yay!!). However I first made a > > mistake and made a new remote branch called jaap in the cheese > > project. > > I now want to remove that branch because it was a

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Cody Russell
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:23 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > > I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from > git on > > demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in > > http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog to only generate ChangeLog for > "make > > dist". I wo

Re: Bumping required version of DeviceKit-power to 007

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 10:03 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit : > Can I bump the external dependencies version of DeviceKit-power from 006 > to 007 for 2.27.x please? 007 was released a few weeks ago, and fixes > many bugs I don't want to work around in gnome-power-manager anymore. Sounds good. P

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Dylan McCall
Applets in general are broken because they are no different in functionality from regular applications, or from each other (in terms of desklets vs panel applets vs. the notification area). Many applets are applets because they have very small, simple interfaces; too small to justify having big top

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread William Jon McCann
Hey Owen, > The main open question for gnome-shell is not how to implement them. > It's the user interface question. And when we look at the user interface > question I think the label "applet" is a bit deceptive. We have all sort > of different things that are applets, and their only commonality

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread BJörn Lindqvist
2009/4/20 Owen Taylor : > The last thing I'll mention here is that I don't think we should be > overly concerned with porting and applet parity. If there was no system > monitor applet in GNOME 3.0, life would go on. What we should be > concerned about is creating the ecosystem where it's easy and

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Jud Craft
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 16:23 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: >> One man's crack is another's basic functionality. > > Note that "Crack" was in quotes. I think it's legitimate for adva

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Dan Winship
Dan Winship wrote: > Who are these people who read > ChangeLog, and what is it that they're doing with it, such that NEWS is > too brief, but a fully-VCS-ed source tree is unnecessary. Sebastien Bacher wrote: > The ChangeLog are quite handy for distribution packages, they have a > list of the chan

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Rui Tiago Cação Matos
2009/4/20 Luca Ferretti : > [0] and for vendors' sake too. A recent example: Dell is adding a > stupid applet on Mini 9, a simple "help" icon to pop-up a menu, each > menu entry pointing to a different section of Ubuntu guide (Internet, > Music, Updates, Printers..). For me this is the most unusefu

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Luca Ferretti
2009/4/19 Emmanuele Bassi : > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:26 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > >> Fortunately Ubuntu is yet experimenting on alternate, ephimeral >> notifications ;) > > that has nothing to do with applets, gadgets/widgets/desktlets/whatever > and resident application. I've a different p

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:37 -0400, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote: > > > > But that's just a gut feeling and maybe it's wrong. The point is, > > ChangeLogs were invented back when RCS-files-on-an-NFS-server was the > > pinnacle of version control technology, and maybe what was most useful > > then isn't

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Stefan Kost
Brian Cameron schrieb: > > Emmanuele: > >> we've been changing the platform gradually over the years, mostly by >> deprecating stuff and including new functionality. nevertheless, I >> haven't heard a single justification for the continued existence of >> "applets". > > I wonder how this fits in

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Germán Póo-Caamaño
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:17 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: > Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship wrote: > > [...] > >> So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git > >> history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who n

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le lundi 20 avril 2009 à 12:17 -0400, Dan Winship a écrit : >> Who are these people who read ChangeLog > Hi, > > The ChangeLog are quite handy for distribution packages, they have a > list of the changes you can look at quickly and the clo

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 04/20/2009 12:37 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>   Not the same. Fitts' law. Having Tomboy applet in border of screen >> makes it crazy big target to hit with mouse, which is good. Notification >> icon is many times harder to hit. The same st

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le lundi 20 avril 2009 à 12:17 -0400, Dan Winship a écrit : > Who are these people who read ChangeLog Hi, The ChangeLog are quite handy for distribution packages, they have a list of the changes you can look at quickly and the closed bug numbers. Usually NEWS summary are either not there or listi

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 04/20/2009 12:45 PM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:58 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need more information than NEWS gives, but who wou

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:58 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: > So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git > history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need > more information than NEWS gives, but who would not want to actually > check out the source tree

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 04/20/2009 12:37 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:24:38PM -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: On 04/19/2009 05:38 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: The Tomboy applet is an extremely convenient way to access your notes. You think of it as wasting valuable screen real estate. But to a hea

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:24:38PM -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > On 04/19/2009 05:38 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: >> The Tomboy applet is an extremely convenient way to access >> your notes. You think of it as wasting valuable screen >> real estate. But to a heavy note-taking person, it's just >> r

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Sandy Armstrong
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > On 04/19/2009 05:38 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: >> >> The Tomboy applet is an extremely convenient way to access >> your notes.  You think of it as wasting valuable screen >> real estate.  But to a heavy note-taking person, it's just >> really

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Hubert Figuiere
On 04/19/2009 05:38 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: The Tomboy applet is an extremely convenient way to access your notes. You think of it as wasting valuable screen real estate. But to a heavy note-taking person, it's just really convenient. Except that Tomboy using a status icon in the notificati

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Dan Winship
Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship wrote: > [...] >> So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git >> history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need >> more information than NEWS gives, but who would not want t

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Brian Cameron
Emmanuele: we've been changing the platform gradually over the years, mostly by deprecating stuff and including new functionality. nevertheless, I haven't heard a single justification for the continued existence of "applets". I wonder how this fits in with the gdesklets project, if at all. I

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Ruben Vermeersch wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:20 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship wrote: >> [...] >> > So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git >> > history on one end and NEWS o

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Philip Withnall
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:02 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Could we get the ChangeLog generation added as a macro to gnome-common? There's a bug for it, but no apparent activity (yet): http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579279 Philip > That would make it easier, and more consistent. We sh

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Ruben Vermeersch
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:20 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship wrote: > [...] > > So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git > > history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need > > more information tha

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship wrote: [...] > So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git > history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need > more information than NEWS gives, but who would not want to actually > check out the source

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 16:23 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > "Crack" > > === > > > > Brightness applet > > Inhibit Applet > > There will be often differences in opionions. I, for one, use above > two applets very often. First, bec

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Dan Winship
Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:00 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: >> Here's something to generate a fairly traditional-looking ChangeLog >> (though working on the assumption that you're doing the subject vs body >> split in your git commit messages): >> >> git log --date=short --pret

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:00 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: > Alexander Larsson wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > >> I like the more verbose format clearly showing which changes are big and > >> which > >> are small. > > > > Well, I don't really disagree that its n

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > "Crack" > === > > Brightness applet > Inhibit Applet There will be often differences in opionions. I, for one, use above two applets very often. First, because changing brightness keyboard shortcut require two hands on my laptop

Re: Generating .gitignore files

2009-04-20 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 04/20/2009 02:34 AM, Steve Frécinaux wrote: Behdad Esfahbod wrote: The idea is that .gitignore files are autogenerated and are NOT stored in the repository. To use, just copy git.mk into your toplevel, add it to git, run "make -f git.mk" and commit all changes it makes to your tree... If th

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Dan Winship
Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >> I like the more verbose format clearly showing which changes are big and >> which >> are small. > > Well, I don't really disagree that its nice to know. However, all such > info is readily availible in git R

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 04/20/2009 10:00 AM, Dan Winship wrote: Alexander Larsson wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: I like the more verbose format clearly showing which changes are big and which are small. Well, I don't really disagree that its nice to know. However, all such info is

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
Alexander Larsson wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: On 04/20/2009 09:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: Hey, I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pang

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 04/20/2009 09:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > >> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > >>> Hey, > >>> > >>> I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango t

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 04/20/2009 09:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: Hey, I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on demand. Those macros have been modified and gath

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on > > demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in > > http://live.gnome.

Re: librsvg api

2009-04-20 Thread Stefan Kost
Kalle Vahlman schrieb: > 2009/4/17 Stefan Kost : > >> hi, >> >> I am using librsvg to get pixbufs for my app. I could not find a dedicated >> list, >> for it, hope this one is okay. >> >> First I am using deprecated api: >> rsvg_pixbuf_from_file_at_size >> as when using >> rsvg_handle_get_pix

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Owen Taylor schrieb: > [...] > > The last thing I'll mention here is that I don't think we should be > overly concerned with porting and applet parity. If there was no system > monitor applet in GNOME 3.0, life would go on. What we should be > concern

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matteo Settenvini schrieb: >> Just to give some ideas >> * do applets need to be in the panel > > No, and that's why Superkaramba - KDE, Google and Microsoft have come up > with on-screen widgets, which may be the solution ebassi is searching > for? >

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-20 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Emmanuele Bassi schrieb: > no need to Cc me in: I'm subscribe to d-d-l. > > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 16:02 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote: > >>> what do applets provide, nowadays, and are they even remotely useful? >>> what can deskbar-applet provide

Re: gnomeweb-wml pushes not causing website updates. missing a hook?

2009-04-20 Thread Owen Taylor
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:58 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 13:19 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > >> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:44 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Not really sure where to direct this, bu

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Hey, > > I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on > demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in > http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog to only generate ChangeLog for "make > dist". I wond

Re: Applets? [was Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0]

2009-04-20 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > (I'm talking about Empathy, Pidgin, RhythmBox, and Banshee > here. And probably quite a lot more.) Well, these are part of the notification area - they will mostly remain the way they are (so I think the RhythmBox and Banshee icons are completely useless). I think the point of applets is