On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:01:53AM +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
Ok, thanks for the reasonable answer. Don't you think it would make
sense for the GNOME to conduct such review officially? And perhaps
explicitly exclude GNOME developers from participation, to make it
unbiased;)
This was
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:09:18AM +0200, Mark wrote:
Some facts.
1. Gnome wants feedback but any feedback gathered online is non
representative. It has to be gathered from a non biased site like
cnn.com-_- guess the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 09:58:15AM +0200, Mark wrote:
False
false
False
false
False
false
False
and false
You are false in all false points. The points are all from messages in this
thread so i recommend you to read back on the list since you obviously
missed something.
The first update to GNOME 3.2 series is now available. As usual it
provides bug fixes, translations updates and tiny improvements, in
order to make our stable release even more stable and useful. Of
course these improvements are kindly provided by our vibrant GNOME
community members and
