On 24 April 2013 04:54, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 04:00 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote:
On 24 April 2013 02:14, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari
ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote:
I
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari
ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote:
In fact, I think that these sorts of subtle
design-based decisions should be held in something like loomio (see
recent loomio post
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon pionchon@gmail.com wrote:
The main point is that so-called controversial features does not have to
be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be shipped as
default, but with a way to revert them in the case they block the
On 24 April 2013 11:57, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon pionchon@gmail.com
wrote:
The main point is that so-called controversial features does not have
to
be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be
shipped
Planning an ostree hackfest would be more useful I would say, instead of
arguing over (another) new way of shipping code to
users/developers/testers...
Once ostree is usable all this will be moot: let developers code the thing
and once finished let everyone know that feature X can be tested with
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
At least until we get a better testing infrastructure in place, the
only way to get at least *some* user testing is [...] to get some minimal
exposure to adventurous users of unstable/experimental distributions
Again
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 12:22 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote:
First: If we are actually ready to roll out ostree images, that's
awesome news!
Depends who the audience is...no security updates and you need to build
applications from source. But if you want to see GNOME as it is a few
minutes or
Hi, is there any progress with this?
I there a Gnome team willing to be the pioneer and try loomio, and
report about the experience? I don't belong to any team so I can't take
responsibility personally (but I'll help you, if you decide to give
loomio a try).
Anatoly
On א', 2013-04-14 at 11:36
Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
...
we have to question
ourselves if this is another trend like the netbook one that is
somewhat transient and misleading.
...
I'd make a distinction here between transformers (Docable tablet that
turns into a laptop+trackpad) that switches between touch
Hi Allan,
On 22/04/13 16:26, Allan Day wrote:
Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
I am not sure what the criteria is with this regard and I might have
miss a public discussion about it. What are we trying to accomplish
with this whole trend towards touch? I haven't seen any successful
single
Hi, is there any progress with this?
I there a Gnome team willing to be the pioneer and try loomio,
and report about the experience? I don't belong to any team so I
can't take responsibility personally (but I'll help you, if you
decide to give
Well the non-coding parts might accept it. The problem with voting is that
it is an emotional choice when it comes to people who are voting and are
not part of development. Which can lead to all kinds of conflicts in
trying to decide how things develop.
If we had voting, we would have had to
Tomas Frydrych tf+lists.gn...@r-finger.com wrote:
...
As a basic, but I think pertinent, example -- if one of the reasons for
the current design being touch unfriendly is that certain UI elements
are too small (which is the most rudimentary problem any UI moving from
pointer to touch faces),
13 matches
Mail list logo
