Re: Touchscreen Compatibility [was: Feature proposal: combined system status menu]

2013-04-25 Thread Juanjo Marín
> > De: Allan Day >Para: Alberto Ruiz >CC: desktop-devel-list >Enviado: Miércoles 24 de abril de 2013 18:34 >Asunto: Re: Touchscreen Compatibility [was: Feature proposal: combined system >status menu] > > >Alberto Ruiz wrote: >... >> we have to questio

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 16:41 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > The currently-defined Restrictions in autopkgtest are rw-build-tree, > breaks-testbed, needs-root and build-needed. The two build ones are not > relevant for installed tests. GNOME could use needs-root, breaks-testbed > (if it breaks the s

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Travis Reitter
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 16:41 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: This general plan looks really good to me. I think it'd help us really tighten up quality at the boundaries of our projects. > On 25/04/13 15:45, Colin Walters wrote: > > Though you've got me thinking: maybe instead of > > the /usr/bin/foo-

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Simon McVittie
On 25/04/13 15:45, Colin Walters wrote: > Though you've got me thinking: maybe instead of > the /usr/bin/foo-installed-test naming scheme, we should > have /usr/share/installed-tests/foo.desktop. Desktop files by their > nature already: > > 1) Are what we use to launch binaries > 2) Have metadata

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Dan Winship
On 04/25/2013 10:21 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > See: > > https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests > Installed tests go in /usr/bin/testname-installed-test. That seems unnecessary, since they're not run as part of ordinary system operation, and it will pollute autocompletion. I think it wo

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 16:30 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > What are the requirements in terms of what tests are allowed to do? I'm > guessing they shouldn't touch the running environment, That's a good question. The gnome-ostree testing infrastructure uses qemu with a copy-on-write qcow2 disk s

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey Colin, On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 10:21 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > See: > > https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests > > > I'm in the process of transitioning to that page from > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DXgGEKTbC4ed1DFW3Mu-48TpHtq-xdfhDtwoUOWWcHg/edit > > Comments appreci

New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

2013-04-25 Thread Colin Walters
See: https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests I'm in the process of transitioning to that page from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DXgGEKTbC4ed1DFW3Mu-48TpHtq-xdfhDtwoUOWWcHg/edit Comments appreciated; I have prototype branches of gnome-ostree, gnome-desktop-testing, and gjs that i

Re: Feature proposal: combined system status menu

2013-04-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 23:24 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > So it's important that we get it right the first time. No, it's not. It's important that we make the changes when we get details wrong, as is the case in any software. If we had to get things right the first time, we wouldn't be writi