On mån, 2014-02-03 at 09:54 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hello,
I'm typing this from my Sony Vaio Pro 13. The resolution on this thing
is 1920x1080 on a 13 display, putting it at about 160 dpi, so I don't
get any automatic scaling love.
Without scaling, there is a massive amount of eye
On 29/01/14 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
Hi all,
I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files
headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see
this metabug for more information:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455
Below
Many thanks Martyn for taking care of this.
Best regards
2014-02-03 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
On 29/01/14 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
Hi all,
I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files
headers. There are several modules affected by this
On mån, 2014-02-03 at 09:27 +, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014, Alexander Larsson wrote:
[...]
Also, the multi-monitor situation wrt hidpi is essentially unfixable
on X11.
Would you have details or pointers on this part? (We'll have X around
for many years to come, at least
hi;
On 3 February 2014 04:24, Arun Raghavan a...@accosted.net wrote:
Hello,
I'm typing this from my Sony Vaio Pro 13. The resolution on this thing
is 1920x1080 on a 13 display, putting it at about 160 dpi, so I don't
get any automatic scaling love.
you shouldn't get any automatic surface
On mån, 2014-02-03 at 14:19 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014, Alexander Larsson wrote:
Well, the way scaling works on X is that we set a global value for the
scale factor, and all apps just render that much larger. It is
impossible for an X app to render at two sizes for
hi;
On 3 February 2014 13:54, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
It seems to me X can properly expose the DPI, physical dimensions and
logical dimensions in pixels of each screen, so would it be possible to
use these correctly wherever the app starts, and signal the app if it
ever
CC'd over from the Fedora Desktop developers mailing list:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 19:04 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This is a very contentious topic, and you're promoting a minority view
(I suspect GNOME and KDE are much more popular in Fedora than the
other desktops), so lots of
Forget to include a citation for the MATE desktop roadmap:
http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/roadmap
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 22:22 -0500, Alexander GS wrote:
CC'd over from the Fedora Desktop developers mailing list:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 19:04 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This is a very
