Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Hubert Figuière
Hi, On 05/01/17 09:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 19:25 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: >> That *will* download, compile, and link stuff like gtk-rs statically >> into librsvg.so. I don't think this is a problem in the long term: >> with things like Flatpak we are a

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 19:25 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > That *will* download, compile, and link stuff like gtk-rs statically > into librsvg.so.  I don't think this is a problem in the long term:  > with things like Flatpak we are already moving away from distros > trying > to mandate whi

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 20:21 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> It has been mentioned on #debian-devel that rustc is really only >> supported on i386 and amd64 (as a so-called tier1 architecture). >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/pac

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 20:21 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > It has been mentioned on #debian-devel that rustc is really only > supported on i386 and amd64 (as a so-called tier1 architecture). > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rustc&suite=sid looks > pretty sad. > > Just curious if

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 11:37 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hm, I'm excited for Rust, but I think we probably do not want GNOME > to > depend on an alternative package manager like cargo, right? At least > that would require some serious discussion here first. Librsvg still uses autotools; it

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
I'd be very careful in framing this issue in absolute terms like you've been doing. For instance, I think you need to be explicit in saying you're speaking with your Fedora packager hat on. Personally, I have no problem in having people rely on pip, cpanm, npm, or cargo to get their software in ord

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 18:25 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > I don't see why not. Cargo is not just a "package manager" (unless by > "package manager" you mean "something that clones a list of Git > repositories") but also the preferred build system for Rust. It downloads third-party software, whic

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi there! 2017-01-04 1:48 GMT+01:00 Federico Mena Quintero : > Librsvg 2.41.0 is just released! > > This is the first version to have Rust code in it. The public API > remains unchanged. Apologies in advance to distros who will have to > adjust their build systems for Rust - it's like taking a o

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Ross Burton
On 5 January 2017 at 18:25, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > As for Continuous, we should be able to add Rust to the Yocto base. > Unfortunately, the build bot is still not running (and it hasn't been > building images since early December), and I don't have access to it > to check why. > There's a meta

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On 5 January 2017 at 17:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 18:48 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: >> Librsvg 2.41.0 is just released! >> >> This is the first version to have Rust code in it. The public API >> remains unchanged. Apologies in advance to distros who will have

Re: Librsvg 2.41.0 is released

2017-01-05 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 18:48 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > Librsvg 2.41.0 is just released! > > This is the first version to have Rust code in it.  The public API > remains unchanged.  Apologies in advance to distros who will have to > adjust their build systems for Rust - it's like taking