On Thu 18 Apr 2013 20:16, Nikita Churaev lamefun@gmail.com writes:
newClass.__proto__ = this.constructor.prototype;
where newClass is a function. Why does Gjs do this? Isn't this
non-standard?
ES6 will standardize __proto__.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi,
There has been a lot of traffic on d-d-l recently. That's great. It's
a bit difficult to follow though, at times. It would be really helpful
to a casual reader if, when replying, people would trim the parts of the
mails that they are quoting.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Thu 22 Sep 2011 16:17, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org writes:
Ige-mac-bundler copies all of the files you indicated in your bundle
file, and also pulls in the dependencies it can find, and it adjusts the
install paths to reflect the new locations.
[...]
You need to list the
On Sun 04 Sep 2011 08:31, Xavier Cho fender_ru...@yahoo.co.kr writes:
On a side note, I really like to see kind of a 'switchable' dock so I
could change set of applications on it according to task currently I'm
on. For example, when I do some music related work, I often use jackd
related
On Fri 19 Aug 2011 13:33, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
That's a reasonable alternative. How about pleased? Any other people
have an opinion?
You present yourself as reasonable by adjusting on the small points,
but you ignore the feedback of greater importance.
My
Hi Alan,
FWIW I mostly like GNOME 3, so I don't want to pile on the flamefest.
But this bothered me:
On Sun 06 Feb 2011 15:27, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com writes:
Even if you had records of every discussion, you wouldn't get the
information you're looking for. Design decisions don't get
On Mon 31 Jan 2011 14:59, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com writes:
- there is no stronger API/ABI rules, but it's true we'd like to have
gtkmm follow the schedule.
I am also surprised at the lack of rules here, and additionally, the
lack of discussion. Without the rules, it's just
On Mon 31 Jan 2011 22:03, Frederic Crozat f...@crozat.net writes:
2011/1/31 Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com:
Regardless of the ultimate decision -- NB, not being discussed at
language-bindi...@gnome.org -- the lack of communication from the
release team is lamentable.
And this kind of attitude
Hi Steve,
On Mon 04 Oct 2010 13:10, Steve Frécinaux nudr...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to propose libpeas as part of the desktop release set, or
whatever the release team cooked to replace it in Gnome 3.0.
Libpeas sounds really neat :)
Did you solve the toggle refs issue that Owen brought
On Thu 19 Aug 2010 13:09, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com writes:
right now libchamplain has the version number as a part of its name,
e.g. libchamplain-0.7.so.
If you encode a version into the name, use the stable version. If 0.7 is
a stable series, use -0.7 in the name. Otherwise if it is a
Greets :)
A couple points of clarification:
On Wed 14 Jul 2010 21:45, Christian Persch c...@gnome.org writes:
[In] copyright assignment, you don't have *any* guarantees about the
terms the new 'owner' may choose to distribute your work under.
Not true! For example, when you assign to the
Hello,
On Tue 06 Jul 2010 14:54, Holger Berndt bern...@gmx.de writes:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:00:09 -0400 Ryan Lortie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Do you feel okay with the idea of allowing proprietary apps to use
our platform but not GPLv2 apps?
In
On Mon 14 Jun 2010 12:57, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com writes:
Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 11:38 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
That's not a decision for the software writers to make when their code
is in the GNOME release.
Why would GNOME tell software writers that their code can't have
Hi Vincent,
On Wed 02 Jun 2010 01:38, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org writes:
+ gjs (desktop)
= approved, but with other bindings (not desktop)
Does this mean that gjs will follow API/ABI stability guarantees of
other parts of the GNOME platform, or of the old Bindings releases?
Cheers,
Hi Mikkel,
On Thu 22 Apr 2010 21:40, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com
writes:
Here's what we do. We set a series of milestones and target bugs and
blueprints to these milestones. We also attach branches (not patches)
to bugs and blueprints. When a linked branch is ready to
Hi Tomeu,
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
bindings, at the current development rate.
Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection metadata not expressive enough,
or does pygi not implement all that
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 18:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Plugin vs extension?
[...]
My €0.02: I think that people are getting used to the Extension term,
and it sounds less geeky.
Extension has the advantage that there's only one way to spell it (as
opposed to plugin vs plug-in).
A minor
Hey Calum,
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:41 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
I'd appreciate it if you read through the parts of the a11y
guide [3] that apply
Wow, nice link. I wasn't aware of this document.
Thanks!
Andy.
--
http://wingolog.org/
___
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 16:11 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parallel-instabllable is the worst idea of software development.
See http://ometer.com/parallel.html for the reasons why GNOME does it
this way.
Regards,
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 10:57 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Please do not reply to this message on the mailing list.
Please don't pontificate. Your holier-than-thou tone is tiring.
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 22:36 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
[gtkmm breakage with new gnome-vfs]
Turns out to be caused by the bonobo changes in gnome-vfs-2.15.3
This happened to the python bindings as well, and likely will happen for
other bindings...
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org
/software/guile-gnome/)
Cheers,
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
gst-inspect-0.10?
Just that user -- so that's probably not a good idea (ie when does root
run media apps?). Multi-user systems will have a startup penalty for
each user.
Regards,
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
packages.
Regards,
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi me,
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:04 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
Depending on your machine it might take
a couple seconds to get everything registered.
Hm, I should clarify before the flames arrive: in the normal case, when
the mtimes of the plugins haven't changed, and the set of plugins didn't
plans are.
Regards,
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org/
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
26 matches
Mail list logo
