On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 12:53 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
You're making an argument about simplification in a thread about
middle-click, but the designs for what might happen to
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 17:51 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi Dominique,
Bastien Nocera, who's been leading the GNOME effort to switch to BlueZ 5
is currently on vacation. I don't know all the details but I'll try to
reply with what I know.
I'll add Gustavo Padovan to CC as well if he wants
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 14:46 +0200, Lanoxx wrote:
Today I was writing some simple glib application and had a look at
this page [1], to get some advice on how to compile and link my
program with glib. However for me the advice was not entirely correct,
since it give this example line:
cc
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:27 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:54:12PM +0200, Mark wrote:
FYI: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTAwMjY
Useless.
Web surveys are guaranteed to self-select, and I have to imagine a
survey hosted on phoronix self-selects a
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 08:30 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 25 février 2011, à 18:08 -0600, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:32 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
This looks like you're using a tarball for the build instead of upstream
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:32 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
This looks like you're using a tarball for the build instead of upstream
jhbuild's module that pulls from git master? I can't seem to find
This is because we release GNOME versions as a set of tarballs; and we
want
to go out of their way to replace the system NetworkManager daemon.
But NetworkManager 0.9 has the features we need to properly integrate
with our plans for GNOME 3, so that's what anything we implement in the
UI should be targeting.
I'll let Dan Williams follow up here to describe
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 19:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 22:38 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
(cc'ing the NM list)
Le vendredi 02 mars 2007, à 21:54, Jaap Haitsma a écrit :
Something I noticed.
The latest release of network manager (applet
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 22:38 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
(cc'ing the NM list)
Le vendredi 02 mars 2007, à 21:54, Jaap Haitsma a écrit :
Something I noticed.
The latest release of network manager (applet) is 0.6.4 which is
already something like 9 months. AFAIK there has not been a
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 00:39 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 19:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 22:38 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
(cc'ing the NM list)
Le vendredi 02 mars 2007, à 21:54, Jaap Haitsma a écrit
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 22:34 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
So, do you think that it's a configuration problem on my side or
actually a bug in gnome-session? I still think it's the latter.
I don't really know what's going on, but I'm guessing it's either a
bug in the NetworkManager backend
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 12:38 +0100, Diego González wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded network-manager-applet from SVN. I don't really
understand the rationale in separating the applet from NM to distribute
it separately if in the end there is a hard dependency with NM.
did i read bad the
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 16:44 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 17:33 +0100, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
In that case, can I suggest to call the SVN module
network-manager-applet, because that is a lot clearer in my opinion
than nm-applet
Agree, but it's not really an applet
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:13 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 21:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
So, several people suggested that having separate packages would be
useful. I guess it's also useful for testing reasons and to send a clear
message that NetworkManager is not
14 matches
Mail list logo
