On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, adelnetdur+maill...@gmail.com wrote:
hey
now Qt can be plugged into the Glib main loop and uses GTK+ for
drawing, if I respected HIG and used GNOME API, can my Qt application
be consider a GNOME application or even be part of default GNOME
stack?
For a
Hi,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Elijah Newren new...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any release, there
where commits after the last release. So my question here is: who
would care about those commits? They were done 6 years ago and nobody
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
Anyway, I'd rather add John Carr to the sysadmin team. I plan to make a
proposal to switch GNOME to a DVCS where Git works using Johns
suggestion. Then other sysadmins[1] can suggest whatever proposal they
want. These
Hi,
[Disclaimer: I wasn't involved in the construction or running of the
survey, other than the analysis you saw plus some late feedback on the
survey questions (I think my feedback was merely to suggest the
other answer for contributor types.)]
2009/1/5 Andrew Cowie
Hi Max,
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks. I'm Max, from the Bugzilla Project. I also have a
company called Everything Solved, and we'd be the ones doing the
upgrade work if it happens.
This is great news. :-)
All the
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Jaap A. Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering why many GNOME developers are using git mirror
and for example not a bzr mirror? If I for example read
http://live.gnome.org/DistributedSCM I have the feeling that bzr would
also be a very
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:45:34AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
(At least, that's what I understand)
Indeed. This might be hard to do within Bzr (IIRC what Elijah said), due
to repository format / design.
No, I
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like us to finally stop shipping libgnomeprint/libgnomeprintui as
part of the desktop set. As far as I can tell from the jhbuild
moduleset, it's only used by:
+ anjuta, with the scintilla editor plugin (but
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 20 mars 2008, à 22:27 -0400, Andrew Cowie a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 22:39 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
There is no reliable way to determine
the latest versions.
You said you'd be working in
On Jan 31, 2008 3:21 PM, Mike Kestner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:49 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
=
GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release
=
Hey Elijah,
I noticed that you folks picked up gnome-sharp-2.19.91
On Jan 29, 2008 12:32 PM, Benjamin Otte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked into jhbuild and external deps are always tarballs. So I was
wondering if there was a policy against depending on development
versions for external deps. It's a bit more work for jhbuilders after
all.
Otherwise I'd
2008/1/16 Wouter Bolsterlee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008-01-16 klockan 11:31 skrev Luca Ferretti:
Changes in avahi:
[snip]
* i18n support - from 0.6.22 (well, by now there are no
translations available...)
For this sole reason I'd say we'd want to bump the dep up. Thanks for
Hi Carlos,
On Jan 10, 2008 5:10 AM, Carlos Diógenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know why gnome-mag-0.15 wasn't included in this release?
Sorry, apparently someone (probably me) assumed that the stable
release version numbers of gnome-mag would be 0.14.x and that 0.15 or
On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 PM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:45 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Retracted:
PolicyKit PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency)
I kinda dislike the wording here. I
On Jan 9, 2008 6:16 PM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:10 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Blessed as far as gnome releases goes means allowed as a hard
dependency for modules. PK and PK-gnome are not blessed external
dependencies because you said that no hard
On Jan 8, 2008 4:24 PM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following people closed more than 4000 bugs in 2007:
9800 Tom Parker
7047 Susana Pereira
6882 Bruno Boaventura
6649 Pedro Villavicencio
For some reason the people making these overviews:
1. Often are at the top
On Dec 20, 2007 8:59 AM, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I actually asked the release team and got two replies saying external
deps are fine and there was no need to bless/ditch such deps. So maybe
we want to wait until the 2.24 proposal period for this discussion?
I believe you
On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
On Dec 2, 2007 5:07 PM, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 16:55 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are pretty
impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times for
building releases for garnome users
On Nov 30, 2007 2:46 PM, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/30, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeLove
to learn more about how you can help fix these things in the GNOME
Desktop. Thanks.
oh men.. do they really have that.. they must have been in a funny
On Nov 27, 2007 3:30 PM, Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As some of the eagle-eyed among you may have noticed, I released Rarian
0.7.0 several days ago. Since then I've been working on making yelp
work with the (incompatible) new series.
I've now done this to the point I'm fairly
On Nov 23, 2007 11:08 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tarballs are due by Monday November 19th before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME
2.20.2 Stable Release, which will be delivered on Wednesday.
Quick correction: This should read Monday November 26th (see also
On Nov 14, 2007 9:44 AM, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and didn't we agree at the last r-t meeting to have build break
requests moved from d-d-l to release-team@, in order to lower the mail
s/build break requests/external dependency changes/
What in the world does build break
On Nov 13, 2007 12:21 PM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In that case I ask to bump it to 0.6.17
+1 for me (needs another +1)
Nah, external deps aren't like freeze break requests. Any member of
the release team should feel free to update the external deps page or
direct anyone else to
On Nov 11, 2007 3:16 AM, Sebastian Pölsterl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Who schrieb:
*** In the case of 'Gnome Love' bugs - perhaps people people could
offer to 'mentor' on them, so anyone needing to ask questions in
attempts to fix them can
On Nov 10, 2007 7:41 AM, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
* GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
knowledge of C# or Java
you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
On 10/8/07, Edwin Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been doing a lot of research lately, and have decided that I want to
start developing gnome panel applets. Unfortunately, all of the tutorials
are outdated (with the latest one I found being dated 15 April 2007).
Furthermore, it would
Hi all,
Recently I proposed to the release team that it's time for someone
else to take the role of GNOME's Release Manager. With their
agreement, I bring the proposal to the development community at large
to have Vincent Untz take the reins.
Rock on, Vincent. :-)
Elijah
On 9/21/07, Claudio Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:40 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
you need to change it in jhbuild/modulesets/gnome-2.20.modules
Oh, yes. I know. But the question is whether to use the nm-applet branch
officially in the module set or not.
I'm
On 9/21/07, Claudio Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, that given 2.20 is stable now, using the stable brach of
NM(-applet) is the right thing to do. I tried trunk branches for these
apps, and they are not dogfoodable to my taste, and probably more
appropriate for the 2.22 release set.
On 9/17/07, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 16 septembre 2007 à 09:42 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other
On 9/16/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other options be selected?
I don't think it is fair to state this. A lot of
On 9/15/07, Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All:
GNOME 2.20.0 is pyatspi's first official release to the world, so we
want to get the API as close to AT-SPI as possible. In addition, we
want it to support the impending FF3 event type annotation feature. The
patches in question
On 9/9/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to suggest updating the minimum and recommended versions of
libgsf (external dep) from 1.14.4 to 1.14.5. Reason: it makes librsvg
correctly handle compressed SVG images. See bugs #394803 and
#473731 for reference.
Sounds good, go
On 9/3/07, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New list of missing modules (again, by comparing with jhbuild list):
gamin, libxml2, zenity, libsigc++2, libart_lgpl, libxslt
Wow, I figured the list would be far larger and not drop so quickly
either. That's a small enough list that I'm not
On 9/3/07, Carlos Garcia Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
poppler 0.6 has just been finally released. We would like to release
evince today depending on it. Poppler glib API has changed again, so we
need to update not only the minimum, but the required version.
Is it feasible?
Updated
On 9/1/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Olav Vitters
I do understand this is heavy handed way of getting that information.
I'd suggest the heavy-handedness is just mistimed -- it would be totally OK
to announce that this would happen immediately *after* the release of 2.20,
On 8/27/07, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 23:39 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 27 août 2007, à 23:09 +0200, Jaap Haitsma a écrit :
Hi,
The gnome-searchtool icon got removed from gnome-icon-theme because it
got replaced by the system-search icon.
On 8/16/07, Kjartan Maraas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tor, 16.08.2007 kl. 12.18 +0200, skrev Frederic Peters:
Hello,
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
I'm still in the process of building the release and have uploaded the
modulesets and versions file to the ftp server so far. Hit a few snags
On 8/15/07, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed on the 2.19 schedule that we were supposed to release
2.19.90 this past Monday and today was supposed to be the 2.20 beta1
release? There wasn't any announcement on this list, so I haven't
yet spun a version of GDM. Is this
On 8/1/07, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime, I'll ask the same question as I did before. Can we just
consider libsexy or notification-daemon a blessed dependency given how
widespread they both are these days?
+1 from me. It's so widespread already that the
Hi,
On 7/12/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For applications that want to be single instance and can just rely on
D-Bus, there's no need to wait for a fancy unique application
library - just try to own your app's D-Bus name on startup, and exit
anytime you lose
On 7/13/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've stopped changing the --version-info in gtkmm at all since a couple
of years ago to avoid problems, but I'd really like a simple set of
instructions about what to do in our most common cases, with examples of
actual --version-info numbers
On 7/5/07, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Elijah,
Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS
desktop - http://download.gnome.org/desktop/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS
admin- http://download.gnome.org
On 6/25/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think gnome-love works, there are many bugs marked HELPWANTED or
assigned to gnome-love, i've never seen any being solved by someone
coming out of the blue.
I have. Don't know why the difference exists between our experiences,
but I
On 6/25/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/6/25, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've always been around multiload_applet2. gnome-applets is a collection
of applets and there are already sub-maintainer. I'd like to
commit/work/etc on multiload but my patches are stalled on
On 6/21/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gianni Moschini wrote:
The fixed size respect both. When you open a window, it creates a
button of 100 pixels width (in an horizontal panel)
Each time you open a new window, it creates a 100 pixels width buttons
again, till there is
Hi,
As noted in bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318,
there was a recent gtk+ API change. jdahlin just barely told me that
the changed API has existed since 1998, long before gtk+-2.11.x (and
pointed me to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447214). This
API change breaks
On 6/20/07, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The latest release of Sound Juicer requires libmusicbrainz 2.1.3 for a
new query symbol (used to get the name of the album artist, instead of
the name of a track artist). The current minimum is 2.1.2, can that be
increased to 2.1.3?
On 6/19/07, Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With the recent release of Rarian (new name for spoon) [1], I'd like to
propose replacing scrollkeeper with it and moving it to the external
dependencies moduleset.
Rarian is now on the odd - unstable, even - stable style release
cycle.
On 6/18/07, Diego Escalante Urrelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote about this some months ago:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-March/msg00141.html
Nobody replied however.
Attention all aspiring heroes of GNOME:
Fix bug 310809 and fame will be yours. Not only will
On 6/18/07, Diego Escalante Urrelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hahaha.
Main issue with that bug when I checked it was that there's a lot of
discussion that makes aspiring gnome heroes think that they better let
it on current heroes and rock stars hands.
So if you or anyone can put some nice
On 6/13/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hei,
I'm ok with just bumping the recommended version. Release team, what
do you think?
Done; sorry for the slow response.
Elijah
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On 6/16/07, Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Overhere [1] are the versions of external dependencies listed. I'm
guessing that the minimum version should be the one present in
jhbuild. This way it can be checked if all the software builds with
the minimum version.
But for instance
On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or use the new GRegex?
I think GRegex already requires pcre ? I can see that glib requires pcre
7.0 to build. So
On 6/8/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's now optionnal but enabled by default. Is that OK ?
What does enabled by default mean? Does it mean that it will link to
pcre if found and still build if not found, or does it mean that it if
pcre is not available then an error will
Benoit,
On 5/9/07, Claudio Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 00:54 +0200, Marco Barisione wrote:
Il giorno mar, 08/05/2007 alle 18.26 -0400, Claudio Saavedra ha
scritto:
gnome-system-monitor is not buildable without libpcre. Is this a
required external dependence
On 6/4/07, Damien Sandras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 03 juin 2007 à 23:19 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
On 6/2/07, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno mar, 29/05/2007 alle 10.37 +0200, Luca Ferretti ha scritto:
Current
PWLIB: 1.10.7
OPAL
On 6/3/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 23:57 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007, 13:07 +0200, Benot Dejean a crit :
That's the point: they're good enough to work in most cases, but the
last time this topic was discussed, the consensus was
On 5/31/07, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, minumum and recommended versions for dbus-glib are 0.71.
Reasons to increase recommended version:
* as per [1] there was 2 bug fixing updates
* telepathy-glib needs 0.72
I suggest to keep 0.71 as minimum version, but
On 6/2/07, Carlos Garcia Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
poppler has just released 0.5.9 version. This version has changed the
API in the glib bindings and a lot of important bugs have been fixed.
Evince now depends on this new version, so I suggest to update both the
minimum and
On 6/2/07, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno mar, 29/05/2007 alle 10.37 +0200, Luca Ferretti ha scritto:
Current
PWLIB: 1.10.7
OPAL: 2.2.8
Suggested
PWLIB: 1.11.3
OPAL: 2.3.2
It seems[1] that latest released packages are 1.11.1 and
On 5/23/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GNOME Roadmap draft for 2.20 (and partially for 2.22 and future
releases) is available at:
http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft
snip
Big thanks for all the maintainers/developers who provided the
necessary information to build this
On 5/20/07, Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since external dependencies like hal, dbus, cairo etc. are built from
tarballs it's much easier to build gnome with jhbuild.
I was wondering why gstreamer does not get build from tarballs,
because also gstreamer does not follow the gnome
On 4/25/07, Étienne Bersac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The problem before integration is that gnome-scan 0.5 is a rewrite. I do
not yet have a full featured version of Gnome Scan for Gnome :S.
Luckily, gnome scan has been accepted for Google SoC 2007, so i expect
great improvement on Gnome
On 4/17/07, Nickolay V. Shmyrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
Now Evince development will continue in trunk. For list of planned
features see. Mostly we target annotations support and forms
http://live.gnome.org/Evince/Roadmap
Adding gnome-doc-list as per instructions at
On 4/15/07, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Dom, 2007-04-15 às 15:39 -0700, Peter Korn escreveu:
Hi guys,
I'd like to second Behad's question/suggestion - moving this
functionality into beryl/compiz makes a lot of sense, especially given
the magnification
Hi all,
So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding
such modules as time has gone on, but there are still lots of existing
modules like
On 4/18/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pango totally follows GNOME's release cycle.
Dasher does too as far as I remember.
I updated the page. Thanks for the correction.
/me waits for the flood of other clarifications and corrections
Elijah
Hi Peter,
Wow, these proposals are getting pretty thorough. :) I only have a
couple comments...
On 4/11/07, Peter Parente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Target
LSR relies on modules already included in GNOME releases. One possible
new dependency is desktop-file-utils from freedesktop.org
On 2/11/07, Jonh Wendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will libnotify get in Gnome Dependencies? As listed on
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies ?
We're so fast at responding. ;-) I'm pretty sure someone else asked
the same question last fall too. Anyway, I've added it
Hi,
On 3/22/07, Carlos Eduardo R. Diógenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gnome-mag can be builted with libcolorblind support to
support image filters for the colorblind. This can be
added as an external dependencie. Debian and Ubuntu
will ship it in the next release or are shipping (I
can't
On 4/11/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is totally awesome :) I didn't know our Bugzilla infrastructure
was so nice.
Olav rocks. :-)
But to avoid false-positives, we require human intervention (and only
a few people have the appropriate privileges) involving
On 4/9/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El sáb, 07-04-2007 a las 16:39 +0100, Richard Hughes escribió:
I'm sure other maintainers must be getting as demoralised as myself when
dealing with so many duplicates of a fixed bug.
Still, this can be an indication that your
On 4/8/07, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Given the length of Redhat, SuSE and Debian release cycles, this will
just make bug-buddy useless for many stable users. Ideally you could
Honestly, I think that =2.14
Hi everyone,
Quick question: How hard would it be for you (as project maintainers)
to make a list of major user-oriented changes in your module (since
the last stable release) and send it to gnome-doc-list by feature
freeze? This would include things like changes to the interface, new
features
[Just noticed that Andrew made most of my email obsolete before I
finished. Maybe you'll see something useful, though, so I'll still
send it.]
On 4/7/07, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:13 +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
Personally I am not able anymore to handle
On 4/4/07, David Prieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that when I power on my laptop the session splash after the
GDM lasts only some 3 or 4 seconds, but even after that the desktop
background takes another 3 or 4 to appear, them 5 to get the panel and
another 5 or so to get the
On 4/3/07, Peter Parente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for creating it. One question. Did you intend to give the
Bugzilla module a capital A in Accerciser? It appears to break
from the Bugzilla naming convention. Plus our svn module name is
accerciser. Will that cause a problem with the
Hi,
On 4/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can I cancel the sort on grouped items in the taskbar?
This type of question would be better suited for gnome-list@gnome.org,
or in bugzilla (don't file a new bug though, this one is already
filed).
Thanks,
Elijah
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the thorough proposal. There are three more small steps,
though, as per http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing:
- Add Accerciser to the proposed module list at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNineteen/DevelTools
- Add Accerciser to the meta-gnome-proposed
On 3/27/07, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ NOTE: Please redirect replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
At April 1st the GNOME sysadmins will be upgrading lots of servers from
RHEL3/4 to RHEL5. This will obviously cause downtime. The Subversion
(svn.gnome.org) will NOT be affected. However,
On 3/26/07, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to spam this list, but it seemed important.
I get this on *any* page for bugzilla:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was
unable to complete your request.
Please contact the
On 3/23/07, Tristan Van Berkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, (I'm not sure if such a system might already be
in place...) it might be reasonable to say that a given module might
want to rally an extra bugfix release on the said current release -
if for example an important bugfix
On 3/22/07, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember a while ago some people were talking about how it might be a
good idea to dedicate a release cycle to fixing bugs, with a feature
freeze in effect.
Is there anyone still in support of this idea, or has it been generally
discarded?
I
On 3/19/07, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SSIA
Adding gnome-doc-list to the cc list; please don't forget them in
future branching notices (complete list of who should be cc is in bold
at http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner, which is linked to from
the bugzilla product overview
On 3/17/07, Jonathon Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it make sense to allow the use of gtkmm and other C++ bindings in
our desktop/admin/devtools suites?
As a frequent user of the gnome/gtk C++ bindings, I have to say that
the C++
On 3/17/07, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that evo stuff silently branched for GNOME 2.18.
Interesting...it appears there may be a bug in evolution, or Harish's
mail server. Harish did send an email, and it looks like it was
supposed to go to all the appropriate lists (d-d-l,
On 3/13/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions that
On 3/13/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Michael R. Head wrote:
Debian/unstable also still has GNOME 2.14.
But can jhbuild GNOME 2.16 and 2.18.
...and would still be able to even if it only had Python 2.3 installed
by default: jhbuild builds python as part of
Hi Rich,
On 3/12/07, Rich Burridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
Is there any chance we could we get you to make the minor version
number for gcalctool match that of GNOME's (e.g. 5.19.x for the next
unstable cycle)?
Thanks,
Elijah
On 3/12/07, Rich Burridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Elijah,
I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
Is there any chance we could we get you to make the minor version
number for gcalctool match that of GNOME's (e.g. 5.19.x for the next
unstable cycle)?
Yes. It's funny
After a very long wait...
On 10/23/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I think there is constant confusion about requirements,
I'd like to work on the pages here:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleRequirements
What I would like to do is put the requirements
On 3/7/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/9/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm a GNOME fan, but used Xfce4 for a few weeks due to some of
Thunar's magnificence, and decided to try out the entire suite (on
Etch). Among others, I fell for it's
On 3/6/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNOME should be able to update its dependency for cairo from cairo
1.3.16 to cairo 1.4.0, (1.3.16 was a release candidate for
1.4.0---there have not been any API changes between the two versions).
Awesome, great work. A few points will be
On 3/6/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonus points for making it take less than, ya know, about a million
hours to go through the whole list :)
Yeah, one-by-one alphabetical order doesn't sound very friendly.
/me remembers the old Win95 contributors easter egg...
An older
On 2/28/07, Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Thought this is automatic. Anyway, please bump. 1.3.14 has been out
for a couple of weeks now...
No, it isn't. And we haven't yet created a process for fast-tracking
these either, though we seemed to have general
On 2/28/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 14:38 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
This page can be updated at any time by the release-team. Others not
in the release team can update the micro version number of modules if
(a) they introduce no other new (or newer
On 2/19/07, Jani Monoses [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there a minimum required GTK+2.0 version that modules in svn trunk
should depend on? I could only find the external dependency list in the
Why would we want to force people to require a higher version of gtk+
than they need? gtk+
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
