On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 19:42 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 August 2011 14:13, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anyone in the universe able to create a user survey worthy of
GNOME?
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:13 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
My main fears in a setup like this is:
* Conceptually a chat app needs to be running all the time when you're
online (as you might get a message), but generally you don't want to see
it all the time. With us not having a good
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 04/20/2009 09:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hey,
I first wrote Makefile.am magic for
On 01/04/2009 05:10 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:40 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:33 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size
You should look for glade files too, I guess.
I've run this on my
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did I miss something that said that this issue only applies if you're using
glade? What about projects that don't use glade and set the page_size
attribute in code?
Nobody said that it only
Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 00:33 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Homepage: http://clutter-project.org/
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00184.html
License: LGPLv2 or later (I believe)
Short description:
==
Clutter
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please point the rest of us to the
discussion where Imendio/Gossip staff gives their reasons against
LGPL.
Google is your friend :)
This was partly discussed on IRC with Xavier IIRC and also covered here:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 24 mars 2008, à 00:47 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:47 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
http://www.gnome.org/start/schedule-unstable.ics
Let me know if you find any problem.
On 3/18/08, Felipe Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a GNOME user and FOSS developer that would like to know which are
the features users want. Knowing that is a step closer into making a
consequential contribution.
Now I know d-d-l is not the right place for that, neither is the
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 01:04 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/18/08, Felipe Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a GNOME user and FOSS developer that would like to know which are
the features users want
On 1/18/08, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 18, 2008 3:49 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently project information is spread thoughout various systems. The
maintainers are available in MAINTAINERS files, developers in AUTHORS,
the description is possibly in
On 11/9/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to comment about any specific build system. I have a
couple of more fundamental questions about this topic though:
- What's the *problem* that needs to be solved that really demands us
to choose another build system?
I think
On 9/11/07, Adam Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm. I'm not sure that this statement (_very_ strong general opinion)
is true. Some people feel this is the way to go, and some are pushing
very hard for this, but there are also people who
On 8/24/07, Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All:
Ever since we moved to SVN, I've really been missing the *checkout*
feature that we used to have with the old web interface to CVS. With
the *checkout* feature, I was able to maintain documentation in our CVS
module and just point
On 8/8/07, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/07, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure there are other examples. These are just the ones
that I knew off the top of my head. Could we please work on
creating a syntax that allows us to express all this?
Should be
On 5/27/07, Grant McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I've had a question about locale support from a user of my SSHMenu
applet. It turns out it's really a question about gnome-terminal's
locale handling.
Normally, this user works in the pl_PL.UTF-8 locale. Occasionally, he
needs to
On 3/16/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Right now, modules in desktop/admin/devtools suites can use the python
bindings. We also accept the use of gtk# for proposed modules. However,
it was never really agreed whether it was okay or not to use our C++
bindings for GNOME
On 3/17/07, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/17/07, Jonathon Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, right now there is a bit of a mindset in the free
software world that if you're a C++ hacker, you belong in KDE, and if
you're a C hacker, you belong in GNOME. I think
On 10/10/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As there is currently no developer tools suite - I am also requesting
that one be created - I've spoken to Richard (devhelp) and Naba (anjuta)
and they will be willing to be a part of such a release suite - others too
have expressed thier
On 9/7/06, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, there's a reality that HEAD has to always be roughly working since
lots of people are trying to work with it.
Given that reality, a longer cycle essentially does nothing to make it
easier to make large changes, because a branch is
On 8/25/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
You might want to explain *why* you think that :)
Luis
I have my reasons but I think we should start with independent reviews ;)
I have not actually used Gideon for a real project but I did download
it a while ago
On 8/9/06, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 20:59 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
[CCing Josselin; please read the last quoted paragraph :) ]
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 18:55 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
/me starts cheerleading federico on
I don't know
sorry, forgot to reply to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jonathon Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 9, 2006 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [gnome-love] Participate to the GNOME Goals and feel the love!
To: Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/9/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
In the very first paragraph, change:
GNOME comprises of both a desktop and
25 matches
Mail list logo
