RIP old buddy!
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:45 AM Bartłomiej Piotrowski
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been looking at Bugzilla migration requests today and have some
> related announcements.
>
> First of all, if for some reason you are still using Bugzilla, you
> should stop and move to GitLab. I
I've not seen anyone here talking about this:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/open-collaboration-services
(discussed here:
http://dot.kde.org/2009/05/01/social-desktop-starts-arrive ) Has
anyone from GNOME talked with them/looked at this/etc.?
Luis
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
It's not like suddenly gnome.org will start providing all of these [web]
services.
Why not?
http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/07/05/guadec-thoughts-3-where-is-gnome/
Mind you, it would not be easy, but there is no reason
, I use google stuff, like everyone, but
I've never once thought 'man, I wish I could access this via gdata
instead of pop/imap/web browser'.)
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 19:22 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Lets not fall
2009/5/8 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
I think libgdata should be welcome as an optional dependency; having a
youtube plugin in totem is great, and it doesn’t make totem almost
useless without youtube. Having iPod support in rhythmbox is essential,
and it doesn’t make it useless with other
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk wrote:
2009/5/7 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de
Hi!
While I certainly agree that accessing Google services is important for
our desktop I kind of think that it would be a bad signal to include a
module whose purpose to
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2009, 14:06 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
What about gconf/dconf? Or in other words - does GNOME 3.0 depend on
dconf and is gconf deprecated (soon!) or not?
No decisions yet, but definitely should be
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2009, 14:06 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
What about gconf/dconf? Or in other words - does GNOME 3.0 depend on
dconf and is gconf deprecated (soon!) or not?
No decisions yet, but definitely should be
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 23:28 +0100 schrieb Juan Jesús Ojeda
Croissier:
Apport[1] is a system which is able to send a very complete crash log
to a bug tracker system (not necessary the Ubuntu's one). This is
working with
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Brian Nitz brian.n...@sun.com wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 23:28 +0100 schrieb Juan Jesús Ojeda
Croissier:
Apport[1] is a system which is able to send a very
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Brian Nitz brian.n...@sun.com wrote:
- plug-ins for distro specific capture tools (strace, ktrace, truss,
dtrace, mdb, pstack, gdb, dbx,...)
I'd note that this data is actually overrated. Useful, yes, but even
the primitive information we used to get was
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido a...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello,
We are proud to announce that a new GNOME team has been created, focused on
desktop testing automation.
If you have ever wondered how could you test your application writing
scripts that mimic what a normal user would
FWIW, this was originally on gnome-announce; for those who aren't on
that list (1) you should be (2) here is the version with all the links
included ;)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ara Pulido a...@ubuntu.com
Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM
Subject: New Desktop Testing team
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:09 AM, API apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
From: Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido a...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello,
We are proud to announce that a new GNOME team has been created, focused on
desktop testing automation.
If you
[Let me preface this by saying that I respect the work the doc team
has done, but given that their goals were to help users, I think we
can best respect their work by asking the real and hard question of
whether or not the docs, as they currently stand, are helping users,
and not just glibly
2009/2/9 Natan Yellin aan...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Dan Winship d...@gnome.org wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
- Should we just ditch the docs and declare the UI self-explanatory ?
Definitely not.
Why not? Seems like no one has ever bothered to file bug reports about
the
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org wrote:
[1] I'm taking for granted that there are in fact no bug reports; I
really don't know and haven't looked in a long time, though certainly
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org wrote:
[1] ahem: http://tieguy.org/screenshots/terrible_dialog.png
Actually, you know, up now. You can stop throwing tomatoes at me...
Luis
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GNOME Bugzilla is still using 2.20. Current stable upstream is at
3.2. The stable version has several benefits, but overall:
* no crappy table locking, while still allowing full text indexing
(table locking causes
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:31:28AM -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
One question I'd have: are there any steps that can be/will be taken
to minimize the pain during the inevitable next upgrade? Commitment to
getting changes
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Cosimo Cecchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- simple-dup-finder
Suggest we move crashes out of Bugzilla and into a separate database
(like Socorro). Bugzilla should only be for hand-written input from
technical people.
Technically, bug-buddy is already capable
Very cool! Good luck with the project, Emmanuel.
Luis
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm associate professor at Bordeaux University and since few years I'm
running a course with few other teachers about 'reading, understanding
and managing
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now .thumbnails grows without limit, which isn't good. The average
user is surprised to find a 100 MB thumbnail cache in a hidden directory.
Mine is 800M, which is 10% of my entire /home partition. And this
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008, à 10:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Hi guys,
it was already requested by a few people in the GNOME community to have
a quick access to all patches distros apply. Since we now have a much
2008/9/11 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 09:01 -0400, Luis Villa a écrit :
Is anybody regularly reviewing/triaging those? I assume no, right?
'twould be a great project for somebody.
We are trying to forward all those that are relevant for upstream
And login times? Impacted, not impacted? Application performance?
(Granted this last one is probably hard to get at, but it still seems
important to measure- we are, after all, considering something here
that could impact every single application.)
Tangentially, I'm disappointed with the 'a user
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And login times? Impacted, not impacted? Application performance?
(Granted this last one is probably hard to get at, but it still seems
important to measure- we are, after all, considering something here
that could impact
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And login times? Impacted, not impacted? Application performance?
(Granted this last one is probably hard to get at, but it still seems
important to measure
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Mark Doffman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone, Luis,
Luis Villa wrote:
And login times? Impacted, not impacted? Application performance?
(Granted this last one is probably hard to get at, but it still seems
important to measure- we are, after all
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
motivating reason for rejection, also... most of the apps we ship are
mostly useless to most of our users.
Do you think so ? It may be I almost perfectly matched GNOME apps
till today :)
Looking in Utilities: I rarely use
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2008/6/21 Jason D. Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In my opinion, whatever The Next-Gen Gnome is, it isn't going to happen
until we really, really have a deep maintenance cycle going on here. That
means fixing a
Looks cool.
Not really related to 2.24 at all, but have you looked at the
'timeline' stuff nat wrote some years back[1]? Might be interesting to
integrate that idea somehow. (Timeline has been on my mind, since I
find the shell history meme that is all the rage on planet.gnome to be
supremely
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see the UI reviewed before giving it a +1, as I've had very
hard times understanding how to actually make it work. Something a bit
more like iSync (at least for the core PIM data) would be nice.
+1. I tried
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:35 AM, natan yellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I'd just like to point out that I've only been using Linux for
about eight months. If anything I say is incorrect, corrections are more
than welcome.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Luis Villa [EMAIL
One followup, one other suggestion, one followup.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* widgets: Vista, OSX, and KDE4 all have widgets/gadgets/Kthingies
that are pretty, very easy to use, very easy to develop (since they
are web-based), and which display more
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Ketil Wendelbo Aanensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm new on this list.
Luis Vila encouraged me to send some info to this list, so here goes:
Disclaimer: I'm not a developer, just an avid user of Gnome and
various eye candy. I especially follow
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Étienne Bersac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just rewrite sticky note using Vala, you will make some users happy
rather than poisoning d-d-l with flames. :)
Don't port sticky notes. It's so 1980s. Tomboy is teh awesome.
Seriously, I am very suprised that no
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Étienne Bersac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just rewrite sticky note using Vala, you will make some
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Sandy Armstrong Don't
port sticky notes. It's so 1980s. Tomboy is teh awesome.
Seriously, I am very suprised that no one from the less central
languages has tried to port Tomboy to their suggested language of
choice (hello,
On Feb 16, 2008 5:00 PM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2008 4:50 PM, Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see documentation on 'GNOME recommended automated testing'
for all the kinds of projects we see in GNOME (including for the various
languages). I think
On Feb 16, 2008 4:50 PM, Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see documentation on 'GNOME recommended automated testing'
for all the kinds of projects we see in GNOME (including for the various
languages). I think this thread is a great way to try and get community
consensus
On Feb 12, 2008 12:58 PM, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's people determined to make this work and working hard to do
that, let's rather support them than make them feel rejected.
That was absolutely not my intent; if the problem is as bad as was
originally implied (that the .0
On Feb 12, 2008 11:15 AM, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 10:01 AM, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I can't say I'm happy about something like that though, since I spent
the last 1.5 years or so
On Feb 12, 2008 8:53 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 08:42 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without
On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME 2.23/24? We've never
allowed this kind of thing before -
On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously,
releasing Nautilus with too
On Dec 4, 2007 11:35 AM, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:29 +, Stef Walter wrote:
Dan Winship got me thinking about the unable to verify identify of this
certificate dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
otherwise unverifiable certificates.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:26 PM, Stef Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
Comment 1: this is awesome. I'm very psyched to finally see proper ssh
support, and in general to see better identity/key management in
GNOME. This is hugely important- I think much more so than people seem
On Dec 1, 2007 2:59 PM, Stef Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gnome-keyring 2.22 will include:
* A proper SSH agent integrated with the user's login keyring
* An X.509 key and certificate store than applications can
use and share, and integrated with the user's login.
I wanted to
This is quite nice, Peter. With the proliferation of free fonts of
late, we should definitely look into shipping/bundling some
'recommended' GNOME fonts, particularly this one, since (I assume) it
has accessibility benefits.
It is interesting to note that (as far as I can see from [1]) these
On Oct 31, 2007 5:18 PM, Alex Graveley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* There is an experimental standalone panel version of Gimmie.
This can be branched into a sub-project, or simply not installed by
default. I am *not* proposing to expose this panel alternative as
part of GNOME. There are
On 11/1/07, J French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'll certainly have a look at those.
Offhand (and I really haven't looked at any code yet), I'm thinking it'll
probably be easiest to use GIMP as a base and then throw a word processor on
top
of that (or maybe Inkscape or something else
On 9/27/07, Andrew Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 10:03 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
I wouldn't re-license it
[there is tons of both context and history here, which the rest of this
thread covers. On the topic of licencing, however:]
I must admit that as an advocate
On 9/27/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
27 sep 2007 kl. 15.32 skrev Luis Villa:
Hi,
On 9/27/07, Andrew Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 10:03 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
I wouldn't re-license it
[there is tons of both context and history here, which
On 9/27/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
27 sep 2007 kl. 16.00 skrev Luis Villa:
Hi,
It is of course their call. And likewise it is the GNOME community's
call not to accept libraries licensed as such.
We have a very longstanding and very deliberate policy to license
our
On 9/25/07, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 09:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The screenshot of the calendar does not show the week number (it's useless
clutter, relaly). I think the week number is there in the released
versoin
due to the way the
On 7/22/07, Alexander Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sön 2007-07-22 klockan 10:26 -0400 skrev Havoc Pennington:
I think when possible, it can be nicer to store stuff online via the
online app that edits it - e.g. store photos on Flickr, rather than
store photos in a remote filesystem or
On 7/22/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/22/07, Alexander Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sön 2007-07-22 klockan 10:26 -0400 skrev Havoc Pennington:
I think when possible, it can be nicer to store stuff online via the
online app that edits
[I think you probably meant desktop-devel-list instead of gnome-devel
list; am cc'ing d-d-l.]
On 4/11/07, Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I'm not entirely sure where to send this so pardon the cross-posting.)
I'm looking into adding support for Simpy[1] to epilicious (an extension
On 3/20/07, Manu Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Recently the problem of changes of resolutions has been raised [1] on
the usability list. I would like to start a discussion about how to
manage the effect of resolution changes on the panel layout better
than what we do today. This
On 3/6/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do you all remember that we list our contributors in About GNOME? The
list of GNOME contributors is probably outdated: many people contributed
a lot of stuff in recent years and are not there. It's a shame to not
thank them, so we have to
[I'll note that the direction the rest of this thread has gone is
indicative of why I'm very, very pessimistic about the long-term
health of GNOME right now. Take this as a mild attempt to get back on
track by talking about users and user experience instead of
capitalization of directories which
On 2/14/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 11:27 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
[I'll note that the direction the rest of this thread has gone is
indicative of why I'm very, very pessimistic about the long-term
health of GNOME right now. Take this as a mild attempt
On 2/14/07, Christian F.K. Schaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the Elisa hackers are not sitting on their hands
Of course. I didn't mean to belittle them, or the mugshot team, or any
of the various other teams who are working on furthering GNOME while
avoiding desktop-devel.
I had written a much
On 2/11/07, Étienne Bersac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's more usable that your proposal (get someone to start something from
scratch) as it exists, so I don't see your point. Elisa has exactly the
same goals as the Apple and Microsoft media centres.
Hi, my proposal was just a
On 2/6/07, Alex Graveley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please constrain useless comments like this to private email.
Yeah. That was not constructive.
Things that might have been constructive:
* here is how slab clones windows, and here is some usability
reasoning on why that particular cloned
On 2/6/07, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the lack of very basic things like obeying
fitts' law when in the panel.
FWIW, this is now bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404978
I assumed it was known, but apparently not (because it is a semi-edge
case). Lesson: never assume
I know a couple folks were talking about something like this a few
months ago, and I believe some code was even written- Shaun? There
were even some less creepy names- heartbeat, maybe? :)
[Speaking as someone who wants to observe GNOME from afar, I'm
intensely interested in seeing this go
On 9/22/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Brian!
Please don't take this the wrong way, but from what I can see, you might
as well not even call this GNOME!
Not having seen the mockups at all, but... so? I believe we call that
'thinking outside the box'.
Luis
On Fri, 2006-09-22
On 8/25/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Dahlin wrote:
I'm not sure I see the point of one more ui designer and one more ui
loader...
Johan
I dare to say that I am offering a Porsche 911 while you are talking
about broken bicycles ;)
You might want to explain
Sounds like this is *right* up GNOME's alley- $4K for projects/people
doing usability/accessibility work.
Luis
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fouad Riaz Bajwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Aug 24, 2006 5:20 PM
Subject: [iCommonslab] APC CHRIS NICOL FOSS PRIZE IN 2007
To: [EMAIL
On 7/26/06, Brian Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/19/06, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
* distros are all crap at getting their bugs upstream, pretty much.
(Some are slightly better than others, at various times.)
So now that we've got
On 7/24/06, Andy Wingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 16:11 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parallel-instabllable is the worst idea of software development.
See http://ometer.com/parallel.html for the reasons why GNOME does it
this way.
And forgive me if I
Tangential to this, there was an awesome BOF at GUADEC about
continuous build integration, which hopefully would avoid problems
like this. Has there been any news on that front that I missed? :)
Thanks-
Luis
On 7/24/06, Jason D. Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After bludgeoning jhbuild to get
On 7/24/06, Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
Tangential to this, there was an awesome BOF at GUADEC about
continuous build integration, which hopefully would avoid problems
like this. Has there been any news on that front that I missed? :)
Things I know: Thomas
On 7/19/06, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
* distros are all crap at getting their bugs upstream, pretty much.
(Some are slightly better than others, at various times.)
So now that we've got XML-RPC support in bugzilla, it would be insanely
cool if someone could
On 7/21/06, Rouquier Philippe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is the problem I've run into. I'm the author of bonfire, an app for
burning CD/DVD
(http://gnomefiles.org/app.php?soft_id=1158). Recently I've been given a CVS
account to
import it into GNOME CVS.
Before I did it, a user
Gartner has the overall PC market up 11% last quarter, so this isn't
as impressive as it sounds.
http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.php/archive/gartner_apple_sees_154_percent_in_year_over_year_mac_sales/
Still, the 4.6% overall market share in that article is the highest
I've seen cited for Apple
On 7/20/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Luis Villa
Gartner has the overall PC market up 11% last quarter, so this isn't as
impressive as it sounds.
Still, the 4.6% overall market share in that article is the highest I've
seen cited for Apple in years.
It's the growth
On 7/19/06, Ben Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the other thing that the gnome_program_init provides (as I
understand it) is the bug-buddy hooks. However, IMHO, this is more of a
distro thing. Ubuntu's solution
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutomatedProblemReports) seems to be better here,
On 7/19/06, Alex Graveley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Respectfully, I don't agree. There is a big set of missing frameworks
that stops rich interop in Gnome applications, and generally make
applications much harder to write well. All other desktop platforms
include at least a subset of
Hi, Ted:
Judging from the changelog:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/vino/ChangeLog?rev=1.133view=markup
and this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159874
development might best be described right now as 'very slow' :) You
can find the primary maintainer's email in there by skimming a
[Andrew responded off list, and got it just right, so I'm forwarding.]
On 4/21/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Graveley wrote:
HELLO?! Check 1-2-3?
The discussion *was* about Tomboy. An small app I wrote that people
like, and which could benefit from adoption in
On 4/20/06, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 22:38 +0200, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Elijah Newren said:
But, a more important question: We currently only allow apps using the
python bindings into the desktop.
Is this true, or is it just because no-one's
On 4/20/06, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 22:28 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le jeudi 20 avril 2006 à 14:19 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
So, new question we have to address before addressing Alex's proposal:
Should Mono be a valid dependency and C# a blessed
Ahem.
(picture a burning box on my chest)
(also imagine that I am flying, sticking my fist out)
(also, imagine that I'm not me, but rather I'm some mild-mannered
Belgians. Still flying, though.)
http://jhbuild.bxlug.be/builds/2006-04-16-0002/logs/gnome-icon-theme/#install
A bit of googling
On 4/12/06, Brent Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott J. Harmon wrote:
Too bad that documentation is horribly out of date.
Seems like nobody wants to contribute to documentation these days...
Updated PDFs for 2.14 at http://www.gnome.org/~bmsmith/gnome-2-14-pdfs/
Check out
Plans! Plans!
On 4/13/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gnome-applets has been branched for active development towards GNOME
2.16.
--d
--
Davyd Madeley
http://www.davyd.id.au/
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
___
Willie-
This sounds awesome. How does it fit with gnopernicus? Should we
retire gnopernicus from the release, or do they play nicely together,
or...? (Forgive me if this has been discussed before and I missed it.)
Luis
On 4/10/06, Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
I'm writing this to
, though,
there are some very good reasons for it and we'd do well not to toss
it lightly just because we're faced with a difficult choice that the
experts appear reluctant to do for us.
Luis
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 16:10 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Willie-
This sounds awesome. How does it fit
On 4/9/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaap Haitsma wrote:
Richard,
As far as I understand the code of GPM splitting up GPM in a daemon
and a notication area icon/applet would not be so hard.
They are pretty independent from each other.
The daemon just has to watch
On 4/9/06, Corey Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/9/06, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/9/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaap Haitsma wrote:
Richard,
As far as I understand the code of GPM splitting up GPM in a daemon
and a notication area icon
On 3/7/06, James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward Hervey wrote:
revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
offer support for licensed codecs
On 2/16/06, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 2/16/06, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Today at 8:24, Vincent Untz wrote:
We'll be trying something new for new modules in 2.16. I think most of
On 2/8/06, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:25 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 2/7/06, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, we're just over a week *past* UI freeze. ;-)
I know, but didn't we always do UI reviews after the freeze, with
s/the
On 2/7/06, JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:43 +, Jono Bacon wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick question to anyone who may be in the know. After seeing
the NLD10 videos, it seems the GNOME in there is rather similar to the
mockups shown at
On 2/7/06, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
On 2/7/06, JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The changes that were implemented were not as radical as the
mockups. Basically what Nat F. showed in Paris is what was
implemented. The code will be released
On 2/2/06, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the hope is to change it back when things get faster then this current
change is inflicting unnecessary software churn on users.
The hope is to fix all of the problems. Not following the HIG is
something that I would consider a problem. I
On 1/21/06, Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There is always a competition for the splash screen of a new GNOME
release. Wouldn't it be nicer to make this a bit wider such that it
includes a desktop background and a GDM theme?
That way users get a more visually consistent startup
On 1/16/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/16/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They could use basic triaging in the sense that someone should go
through them and see what applies to the 0.10 version. I think that
you'd find most GStreamer bug triagers to mark them
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
