On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 07:40:00PM +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.01.2008, 15:57 -0200 schrieb Tristan Van Berkom:
I can see that xml might be a little less beautiful to the eye, and
also
that text files might be a little less beautiful to a machine who has
to parse
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 5:21 PM, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 13:17 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I mean proper RDBMS. Once you get that in place you can generate
DOAP/RDF/XML/whatever on the fly
Responding to myself as this email address isn't subscribed to d-d-l
and so I don't have the response.
In response to Patryk Zawadzki:
On Jan 18, 2008 1:08 PM, Emmanuele Bassi ebassi gmail com wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 12:04 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
What are the real benefits of
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:50:37PM -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
For other non-GNOME-release stuff that uses libsoup, the new API docs
will presumably magically show up on library.gnome.org at some point,
but until then you can look at http://mysterion.org/~danw/libsoup-2.4/,
and in particular
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:50:22PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Thanks to Olav for running the script (he did so on Jan. 6th instead of
early Jan. 1st, so the stats might have a slight skew, but it's unlikely
to have had a major effect).
Last year it was the same.. also ran only on 6 Jan.. so
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007, à 04:52 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/anjuta/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gdl/trunk/
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Christian Kirbach wrote:
system-tools-backends 2.5.4 is listed on [1] as an external dependency
as both the minimum and recommended version. The tarball depends on
dbus 1.1.2. However, we have listed 1.0.2 as both minimum and
recommended versions - we
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
UPDATED: epiphany-2.21.4
epiphany was updated without a NEWS entry.
Epiphany had a huge NEWS update for the 2.21.4 release.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 02:26:55AM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
UPDATED: epiphany-2.21.4
epiphany was updated without a NEWS
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:13:19PM +, Seb James wrote:
1) It would be really nice if the reduced resources switch was
available in the normal Gnome Windows preferences UI
(Desktop-Preferences-Windows). The reduced resources switch I mean
is the one availabe in gconf-editor as
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 05:02:20PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Also, who is maintaining the dep list? I've proposed PolicyKit and
PolicyKit-gnome as soft deps but received no response from the
maintainers of that list. OTOH, lots of projects seem to want to use
PolicyKit at least as a soft
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:47:47PM +0100, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
OK, I think I had the wrong understanding of it.
I guess it's necessary to keep the version as low as possible so that
many people can compile it from SVN by just installing developing
packages from their distro.
Correct?
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
Vinagre which is proposed for the desktop needs at least 0.6.17
because it contains new functionality. In the meantime the avahi
developer already released newer versions which according to the
website are bugfix versions [2]
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 08:51:31AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
I think some proven jhbuild recipes for current Ubuntu and Fedora
distros would be very helpful, somewhere on the gnome web site.
There are some useful resources linked from the jhbuild wiki
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:45:19PM +0100, Ali Sabil wrote:
I have usd waf quite a lot, it basically just blows off autotools,
anyway, I am afraid the whole discussion will become pointless, as
long as people criticize things without even giving them a try, just
for the sake of criticizing...
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:48:29PM +0800, Halton Huo wrote:
Do not know whether this is correct alias to report my problem.
It is not. Use either [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Bugzilla
(sysadmin, mango)
I'm now applying SVN account, after finish the form, I get a New
account request: mail
[ Currently trying pulseaudio... ]
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:20:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I am not sure that PA should become part of GNOME. A blessed
dependency sure, but really a new module of GNOME? Probably not.
Regarding replacing esd. Currently a lot of apps link to
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:54:03PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:50:55PM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Proposal: Drop crasher reports from 2.16 and before
If there are no objects, I plan to implement this around 30 September,
this year.
This has now been
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:56:27PM +0200, Xavier Claessens wrote:
Le mercredi 03 octobre 2007 à 02:52 +0300, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
As part of our roadmap process, we've sent the roadmap information
requests to all module maintainers/developers. If you are a
maintainer/developer
of a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:50:55PM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Proposal: Drop crasher reports from 2.16 and before
If there are no objects, I plan to implement this around 30 September,
this year.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
desktop-devel-list
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 04:56:34PM -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
It's Pidgin and it's non-inclusion in Gnome is irrelevant. Every single
distro ships it as the pre-installed IM client for a desktop install. For
better or worse, it's the application filling the IM space at the moment and
I
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 11:04:43PM +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
FWIW, I'm extremely keen on keeping Gossip going. I personally feel that
Telepathy is potentially dangerous to our cause. I mean, great, you can
voice-video chat with your MSN friends, but you still need an MSN
account. One step
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 05:15:36PM -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On 9/23/07, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ehr, you seem to be arguing that people shouldn't start their own
projects, but rather join an existing one. IMO you cannot dictate what
people do with their time. People
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:12:12AM +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
If a program doesn't allow me to chat with my friends (which is what
I primarily want in an IM app), then how do you expect me ever to
discover the benefits of a free service?
We have legacy transports that provide a basic level
It is now possible to create your own GNOME SVN repository for
*everyone* having a GNOME SVN account.
The full instructions are at:
http://live.gnome.org/NewSVNRepos
But, they are short enough to repeat:
1. If you need to import the history of some existing repository (SVN or
something else),
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 02:50:43PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Does the script automatically create a MAINTAINERS file? :-)
Not yet. It is currently pretty simple (just installs the right commit
hooks, sets permissions and fills the bonsai db). I'll check if the
MAINTAINERS file is possible.
Probably only interesting if you are (or should be) listed in a
MAINTAINERS file
In a few days (perhaps more…), people in /trunk/MAINTAINERS will receive
new instructions on how to approve SVN account requests (via a system
called Mango). These emails will go to everyones email address listed in
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:17:04PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 21 septembre 2007, à 15:08 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
To see the data parsed from the MAINTAINERS files, go to
http://www.gnome.org/~ovitters/maintainer-data.html. This file
is sorted by account name. It has two
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:03:03PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Totem doesn't appear anywhere on the list, despite having a MAINTAINERS
file.
I want an empty line between maintainers, so I'll know where one
maintainers info stops and the other begins. I've added an empty line to
the file.
I'll
Within another project[1], we've starting doing self-introductions. This
is nice as to notice whenever someone joins the project/mailing list.
An introduction usually contains:
* The persons name
* IRC nick
* City/Country (all fields, but especially this one is of course optional)
*
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:13:58PM +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
This is really different -- a Novell developer committing several
dozens of po files[1] without permission to SVN, in effect directly
altering upstream's sources without permission. Now that's a big
oops.
This seems resolved, but
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:36:36AM -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
Yes, using a command called svndumpfilter. You'd have to not care
about your revision numbers being resequenced.
People care about that?
I always renumber them. However, by default it doesn't.
--
Regards,
Olav
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:49:37AM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Ugh, but you then get branches that span everything under testingground
(right?).
No. You'd get
/svn/testingground/$INNOVATION/{branches,tags,trunk}
With dumploading, I'd just s/$INNOVATION//, load it into a new SVN
repos
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:21:23PM -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:27 -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
For example, whenever we commit a patch in Tomboy,
we mention the relevant revision number in a bug comment. If Bugzilla
were smarter it might be able to do neat
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:28:49PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
[moving thread to d-d-l]
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 23:33 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:05:18PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Because it is no longer possible to create new SVN modules easily
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +, Sam Morris wrote:
And presumably doing a full checkout of a package's history from a
subversion server is far more resource-intensive on the server side than
doing the same thing with git. For example, I maintain a git-svn checkout
of the Django web
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 9/11/07, Tim Miao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is Tim from Sun desktop team. I'm looking for some GNOME2.20 API
references pages/packages/tarballs. Would anyone please give me a hint
where I could download them all
Really nice to see these thoughts/suggestions!
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Bryan Clark wrote:
[..]
So stepping outside the SCM arguments for a minute and looking at the
community issues.
In terms of source control access, I don't think there should be any strict
controls. I
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:02:51PM +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
I just checked out the gnome live page comparison of the 3 major DRCS, but I
am afraid the page is actually heavily biased toward git, and contains a lot
of outdated/irrelevant informations. I don't want to start a flamewar, but I
[continued from foundation-list, per request lucasr]
[ Clarification to avoid possible misconception that I reject any tool
because it isn't SVN / easy enough. Please see my initial emails as
well ]
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 08:29:35AM +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
2007/9/8, Olav Vitters [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 12:02 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Murray Cumming wrote:
Could you please turn this off now? I can't commit to either libsigc++
(I emailed you about that already) or gconfmm. For instance:
I think I
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:42:44PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:39 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
consider delaying it until after
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:01:08AM +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
man, 03.09.2007 kl. 08.09 +0200, skrev Olav Vitters:
Assuming 'jhbuild list' gives the SVN name (might not be true):
gnome-doc-utils, nautilus, gnome-themes, libxml2, zenity,
gnome-netstatus, libart_lgpl, gnome-backgrounds
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:48:41AM -0400, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:53 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Olav Vitters
I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:21:10AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le samedi 01 septembre 2007, à 00:02 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
Further, anyone can commit a proper MAINTAINERS file. As soon that is
done all commits will work (you could even combine the MAINTAINERS
commit with a bug fix
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:20:08PM +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Sex, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:06:07PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really important
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
E-mail address is the one your @svn.g.o alias forwards to.
I've made an pre-commit script which
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really important
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:17:40PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 31 août 2007, à 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and
below, but I see how that may be a little to aggressive. What about
dropping reports from 2.14 and below?
Bug-Buddy reports from 2.14 and older are now rejected at
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
E-mail address is the one your @svn.g.o alias forwards to.
I've made an pre-commit script which detects if a module has a valid
/trunk/MAINTAINERS file
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
E-mail address is the one your @svn.g.o alias forwards to.
I've made an pre-commit script which
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:16:39PM -0400, Thomas Thurman wrote:
Thomas Thurman
to Bastien
show details
23:15 (0 minutes ago)
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:36 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
2. The content resembles the following:
Some Name
E-mail: some email-address
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:51:30AM +0200, Sven Herzberg wrote:
Olav Vitters wrote:
Note: Modules without such a file will be ignored (people cannot
request SVN accounts for such modules).
So in short:
1. Please ensure the following file exists in your SVN repos:
/trunk/MAINTAINERS
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:50:12AM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
Wouldn't it be more useful to use something like doap for this?
http://usefulinc.com/doap/
DOAP is wanted for the next www.gnome.org. IIRC Quim Gil (qgil on IRC
#webhackers) is looking for a person to make these DOAP files. If
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:16:17PM +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Since the last time I proposed this, I have fixed the various issues
people had:
* Rarian has now moved to freedesktop, where there's a mailing list,
bugzilla and SVN access
I noticed you use GNOME ftp; assume that will move to
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 06:53:18PM +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
* Bug reports should go into the google code bug-tracker [1]. I'll also
request a bugzilla.gnome.org product for it for people who don't have /
want a Google account but want to contribute. [2]
Sorry, but I do not see the point of
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:29:24PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Hi,
I just got pointed to this: http://live.gnome.org/NewSVNRepos
... and it looks rather bureaucratic.
What part? Most of it is meant for new projects and is just a basic
'open source licences only' + a check that it
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 07:31:56AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
This isn't the first time this has happened to me when bug buddy has
tried to submit a bug report. In this case, the bug report was because
Evolution crashed when I was sending an email message. Does anyone know
what to make of
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:19:12PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 14:20 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
As far as I am concerned I'd like
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and
below, but I see how that may be a little to aggressive. What about
dropping reports from 2.14 and below?
If there are no objections, I'll start with dropping
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 14:20 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and
below, but I see how
[ NOTE: Please redirect replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
At April 1st the GNOME sysadmins will be upgrading lots of servers from
RHEL3/4 to RHEL5. This will obviously cause downtime. The Subversion
(svn.gnome.org) will NOT be affected. However, svn-commits-list
(mail.gnome.org) will be.
Although
Due to various old references people have unknowingly been using
anoncvs.gnome.org instead of SVN. To avoid this, anoncvs.gnome.org has
been removed from the DNS[1].
Note: people who still require access to anoncvs should use the
following hostname:
anoncvs-i-know-i-should-use-svn.gnome.org
Use
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:34:59PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 19:58 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
Due to various old references people have unknowingly been using
anoncvs.gnome.org instead of SVN. To avoid this, anoncvs.gnome.org has
been removed from the DNS[1
The svn-commits-list mailinglist now has a topic per SVN module. You can
configure svn-commits-list to only send the commit mails you are
interested in.
To do so:
1. Go to http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/options/svn-commits-list
2. Fill in your subscribed email address and your password.
3. Click
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:36:21PM +0100, Christian Persch wrote:
The svn-commits-list mailinglist now has a topic per SVN module. You can
configure svn-commits-list to only send the commit mails you are
interested in.
I'd like to use this to limit the numbers of message I receive from
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 06:57:14PM +0100, guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 21:30 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Nice, so just for reference, all you need to do now is put the project
name (e.g. gossip) in the basic filter?
Nope. According to Micah, using the basic filter won't work.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:40:09PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
This should help temporarily, but does anyone know who maintains GNOME's
client scripts so we can fix this?
For future reference, the GNOME sysadmins, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(when urgent), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ticketing system) or
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:11:57PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
Olav:
Isn't it possible to install .desktop files in the user's $HOME
directory? If someone were to trick a user into installing a
.desktop file with a script that does something malicious, is there
anything to protect
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:15:26PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
Perhaps a decision about how it should work should be made and
documented so people understand how it is intended to work?
How what should work? Bug-Buddy or the bug-buddy info in the .desktop
files?
Information about how data
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Brian Cameron wrote:
Why not just add a GConf preference to bug-buddy so that users can
simply turn off this feature if they don't want it to be on. Perhaps
the first time data is forwarded a pop-up can be displayed
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:14:20PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
we should also take care of i18n here by having bug-buddy submit the
user's LANG setting, so the feedback language could be
adjusted/translated.
There is no usable infrastructure on the server to translate something.
--
Regards,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 06:48:30PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
It sounds like a cool idea, but I always worry about code that
automagically runs code in the background without the user being
aware of what is goind on. Especially when desktop files can
be added to the system by installing
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:17:22PM +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
It seems that to fix bug #357859 we need someone with shell access to
CVS to add the eXecute permission to brasero/autogen.sh
done
Anybody know how to do it or, better, who could do it?
http://live.gnome.org/Infrastructure
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:09:37AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hopefully we'll get some of the patches languishing in bugzilla into
HEAD soon. I'd list which ones I'm hoping to get in, including the one I
was just looking at (#333752), but bugzilla has chosen this exact
instant to ban
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:37:59PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Étienne Bersac wrote:
I submit a request for a SVN Repo and a gnome.org account few weeks ago.
Still nothing about both. I would like to avoid using CVS
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Étienne Bersac wrote:
I submit a request for a SVN Repo and a gnome.org account few weeks ago.
Still nothing about both. I would like to avoid using CVS for a
migration in some weeks later ... (and because i'm fed up with CVS)
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:24:10PM +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
The first steps towards inclusion into GNOME (blessed or not) would be
to move GNOME scan to the GNOME infrastructure (CVS, and bugzilla).
I submit a request for a SVN Repo and a gnome.org account few weeks ago.
Still nothing
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:55:48PM +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
How to use gnome bugzilla for gnomescan ?
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/ForMaintainers
(should probably be linked more)
--
Regards,
Olav
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:06:10PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Another thing that may be very easy to get in Bug-Buddy, yet is very
helpful to developers is the output form pmap on the crashed process.
Tells a fortune in one list. Do you think you can do that?
I cannot, but I am sure Fer
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 04:38:20PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 22:27 +0200, Fernando Herrera wrote:
Replying to my-self, this time adding d-d-l :)
I did a try with bug-buddy adding the /proc/self/maps contents:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351197
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:06:10PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 18:44 -0400, Olav Vitters wrote:
Having the X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Version is optional, but highly recommended.
The server will automatically change versions like 2.15.90 to 2.15.x, so
this doesn't have
[ Please keep discussion (if any) in desktop-devel-list; not
gnome-hackers that devel-announce-list might point to ]
With the release of Bug-Buddy 2.16 I am going to deprecate the email
interface used by older Bug-Buddy versions. It will still be supported
for at least a year after bug-buddy
[ Please keep discussion (if any) in desktop-devel-list; not
gnome-hackers that devel-announce-list might point to ]
There are important changes made to Bug-Buddy that requires applications
to check if their application will still work with Bug-Buddy 2.16.0.
Basically, the old Bug-Buddy
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:03:00PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Bugzilla will move to a different server on Friday 7 July at 21:00 UTC.
If you want to know what time that is for your location, look here:
http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=7day=7year=2006hour=21min=0sec=0p1=0
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:50:18AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 5/29/06, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 29 mai 2006 à 08:11 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
Awesome, assuming no one has any reason against it, thanks for making
things more sane. Would it also be okay if
On 4/19/06, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, don't take the 3.0 version lightly, only as a way to improve
GNOME marketing. The jump to 3.x version is invaluable in helping
developers figure out which library
On 4/11/06, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I really don't know if this requires a full module proposal or not, but
anyway, here we go]
AFAIK that isn't required.
I'd like to propose the inclusion of Baobab[1] in the gnome-utils
package.
+1
Baobab has been written by Fabio
On 4/9/06, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A policy request:
It would be a good thing if all applications available from
f.g.o were required to support 'make uninstall'
Most applications found on f.g.o do support 'make uninstall'. There are
some that do not.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:14:19PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
While we're discussing bugs on the product summary pages, the Find
all bugs marked as fixed since only searches on Metacity.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:54:13PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
I was going to remove some old components from the GnomeApplets
product, but I need to move the old bugs out of the way first.
Something that would be useful would be a 'suppress stupidly huge
amounts of email' button.
Had the
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:19:13AM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=gnome-power-manager
[..]
I promise I'm the main developer :-) My bugzilla login is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I need to update the other stuff too -- the
versions are out of sync, and the
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:20:02PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Luis Villa wrote:
Enough changed in the headers/etc. since the upgrade that I just
discovered that gmail is now marking all my gnome bugzilla mail as
spam. Something to look out for if you read bugzilla in gmail.
Taking a
Soon it will be time to make Bugzilla unavailable for 5 hours. This will
be done on Sunday 18 December on 9.00 UTC or:
http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12day=18year=2005hour=9min=0sec=0p1=0
During the downtime I'll upgrade bugzilla.gnome.org to a customized
Bugzilla 2.20.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 07:27:31PM -0500, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Does anyone actually use this feature? So far, it seems like most people
don't even know it exists. Most everyone I've asked so far, has said
that they didn't know about the feature, so I can only extrapolate that
it holds true for
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:13:54PM -0300, James Henstridge wrote:
On 25/07/05 14:33, Rodney Dawes wrote:
The maintanence of gnome-common has been on the lax as of late. James
seems to be too busy or something, and I don't know what has happened to
Malcolm. He seems to just not reply at all to
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0300, James Henstridge wrote:
On 25/07/05 20:02, Olav Vitters wrote:
Malcom: Have done above manually so you won't miss any bugmail.
Note that you still could've watched Malcolm.
That would get mail related to non gnome-common related bugs too though
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:17AM -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
If this happens, just please make sure to handle mono's gdb stacktraces
specially, which all look like this...
Do you mean rejection of bugs based on the stacktrace? It already
works. No bugs rejected yet though.
(no
401 - 500 of 505 matches
Mail list logo
