Hi,
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 15:32 -0800, Britt Yazel wrote:
> Can you explain to me what the big issue with web clients are? I keep
> hearing over and over again that developers don't want to use web
> clients, either in browser or with Electron, but I don't recall ever
> hearing a "why" in there.
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 14:09 -0800, Britt Yazel wrote:
> this is not going to be an academically backed response, just my
> personal take.
>
> I have had horrible experiences with Matrix/Riot.im.
Too bad you missed out on actually mentioning what your experience was.
So it's very hard to
Hi,
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Shall we install our own inclusive symlink for git now, to avoid
> potentially-unpleasant connotations?
Would we be in the position of doing so?
My feeling is that we can control the branch names more easily than the
Hi Adel,
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 04:29 +0200, drago01 via desktop-devel-list wrote:
> Assuming there is a problem in the first place which I doubt. I never
> heard of a case where someone refused to contribute to a project just
> because the default branch is called master.
>
> I'd suggest to
Hi,
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:07 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Which is the crux of the matter really: whatever you're going to pick
> will have different connotations in other languages. Many ESL
> speakers
> will primarily think in their own language and substitute the words
> to
> English.
Hi,
On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 11:24 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> I'm surely not
> the only one that isn't going that extreme in keeping control over
> couple of my pictures flying around and won't go that far.
This is much less about you than it is about other people visiting our
Web site.
Hi.
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 00:09 +0800, 藍挺瑋 wrote:
> Is it possible to get a private bug migrated to GitLab? I have a bug
> report which was marked as private by a libgtop developer, but there
> is
> no confidential information in the bug and I don't know why it became
> private.
>
>
Hi.
On Mi, 2017-05-17 at 14:21 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > By attaching a patch to a bugtracker ticket, we loose the information of
> > the parent commit: where the commit has been initially created in the
> >
Hi.
On Fr, 2017-08-11 at 14:37 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Also I hope in the time frame of 3-4 months the pilot program is successful
For completeness sake:
Are we still considering to *not* move to Gitlab if that pilot is not
successful?
How do we measure "success"?
Cheers,
Tobi
Hi.
On Di, 2017-06-27 at 14:23 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Please, let's stop this fetish about non-ff merges.
Thanks for writing this.
I've been confused by people insisting on "linear history" and the
relatively strict configuration of GNOME's git servers.
I hope that modules will be able
Hi.
On Di, 2017-06-27 at 10:54 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> However, understand that participating in the pilot program means a
> commitment of moving to GitLab with your project for the time being
How does that affect translations?
Will the module not receive translations then?
Cheers,
Hi.
I welcome the proposal to modernise our development infrastructure.
On Di, 2017-05-16 at 10:38 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> You can take a look at their "changelogs" between releases (one each month).
This seems to be the most risky part about moving to GitLab:
Hi.
On Mi, 2017-05-10 at 08:04 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Looks like if you want to do this, we'd have to host it
Or use Stackoverflow.
Sri's motivation was:
> We need to have a search engine index-able library of knowledge on
> our platform. Modern programmers today frequently use
Hi.
On So, 2017-04-09 at 15:44 -0400, Walter Vargas wrote:
>
> Canonical's recent decision about not maintaining unity for Ubuntu makes it
> quite clear that Desktop is not the priority anymore, IoT and Mobile are the
> priority now,
Hah. Before it was the Cloud™, SOA, IVI, other form factors,
Hi.
On Mo, 2016-12-05 at 16:42 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> And I should add... Tracker is not alone here, if it's not Tracker
> stumbling on infected content, with varying but still rather low
> levels of interaction it may be a thumbnailer, a previewer like sushi,
> or the web browser itself
Hi Hanno.
Thanks for bringing it up.
On Mo, 2016-12-05 at 14:03 +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> The core problem here is that tracker automatically parses files of
> potentially unknown origin with parsers that haven't been built with
> security in mind. This happens without any sandboxing.
Right.
Hi.
On Mi, 2016-09-21 at 11:27 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Then, setting LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libasan.so worked for me.
>
> For some reason, Fedora doesn't seem to have a libasan-devel package,
hm. On my system, I have:
$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/libasan.so
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:17:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> undefined symbol: __asan_option_detect_stack_use_after_return
>
> Is anything special needed for dlopened modules?
Try LDFLAGS+=-lasan
Another source of inconvenience is when compiling any library that
GCC needs itself,
Hi! :-)
On Fr, 2016-04-01 at 13:16 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
> You have a comment box there, which is only visible to other mentors
> and admins, in case you want to discuss the validity or quality of
> proposals.
Ah. Just to make sure: Discussions with the students are supposed to be
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 07:31:19PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Is there an existing (hosted) solution alternative to hangouts? Pretty
> much as simple as: "go to this URL"?
I know talky.io, appear.in, opentokrtc.com, appr.tc,
meetme, japkin, and others.
I think all of them are not Free
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:22:56PM +0200, Robert Roth wrote:
In lack of active maintenance (last release 9 years ago, namely 2.14.0) I
intend to take over the maintenance of the Atomix [1] game from gnome
git[2].
Cool, thanks!
Tobi
___
Hi.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 08:47:50AM +0100, Allan Day wrote:
A new version of the HIG is in the works, to be released along with
GNOME 3.14 [1]. I'm currently looking for feedback.
I've pushed an HTML version here for your convenience:
http://people.gnome.org/~tobiasmue/hig3
Please note that
Hi.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any
implementation has been undertaken by GNOME as of yet.
that is correct.
Cheers,
Tobi
___
desktop-devel-list
Hi.
On 25.08.2013 10:54, fr33domlover wrote:
which is why I suggest a switch: Let maintainers
turn off the mirroring.
I think it is safe to assume that your suggestion was heard. You are
free to implement that. And in case it wasn't clear: You are very
welcome to implement the relevant logic
Ahoi,
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
Is there any plan to remove Bug Buddy now that it has been made useless?
Your reasoning is strange. Wouldn't it make more sense to fix
crash.gnome.org? Or did we gave up on software quality?
25 matches
Mail list logo
