Hi Manish,
Le vendredi 01 mars 2013, à 02:00 -0700, Manish Sinha a écrit :
I just wanted to know if pessulus has any future roadmap? With GNOME3
having changed the lockdown method, is there any plans of implementing a
GUI for lockdown?
I wanted to take this up as a GSoC project if it is
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013, à 00:30 +0100, Lanoxx a écrit :
Hi,
in the man page of gnome-session I cannot find any explanation or
reference about the following fields in a .session file:
I guess it's best to look at
/usr/share/gnome-session/sessions/gnome.session as an example if the man
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013, à 14:10 +0100, Lanoxx a écrit :
On 27/01/13 09:02, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013, à 00:30 +0100, Lanoxx a écrit :
DesktopName
This is not used, not sure where you saw that.
On Ubuntu all the session files have such a line.
Then it's an Ubuntu
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013, à 15:32 +0100, Lanoxx a écrit :
On 27/01/13 14:38, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013, à 14:10 +0100, Lanoxx a écrit :
On 27/01/13 09:02, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2013, à 00:30 +0100, Lanoxx a écrit :
Where do get more information
Hi Brian,
Le lundi 22 octobre 2012, à 14:08 -0500, Brian Cameron a écrit :
I would say that it is very probable that people at Oracle could be
found to help with maintainership duties for particular GNOME Fallback
modules if help like this is needed.
I think it's clear that help like this is
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2012, à 12:07 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 15:48 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I would recommend that gnome-shell uses systemd to suspend, and I would
recommend gnome-shell, gnome-session and gdm also drop their ConsoleKit
session tracking
Le lundi 03 septembre 2012, à 08:59 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Mattias Eriksson wrote:
I'm also under the impression that there are a lot of support
for LibreOffice in the Gnome community, and I was told that Documents has
a dependency on it (causing Documents not to be included in
Le lundi 27 août 2012, à 08:37 +0200, Lanoxx a écrit :
On 27/08/12 07:37, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 27 août 2012, à 01:37 +0200, Lanoxx a écrit :
The reason was also that my schema did not have a path set. But for
some reason panel_applet_settings_new() does not warn about this,
when I
Le lundi 27 août 2012, à 10:54 +0200, Lanoxx a écrit :
On 27/08/12 10:41, Lanoxx wrote:
On 27/08/12 08:56, Vincent Untz wrote:
Note that, afaik, g_settings_new_with_path() works fine. It's used in
several applets. See for instance
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-panel/tree/applets/fish
Le dimanche 26 août 2012, à 19:15 +0200, Lanoxx a écrit :
Maybe panel_applet_settings_new should get the comment in the docs,
that it does not retain the settings.
Not sure what you mean -- the settings should definitely be saved.
panel_applet_settings_new() is simply a wrapper around
a path.
As I said, panel_applet_settings_new() is a wrapper around
g_settings_new_with_path(). That's why you don't need a path in the
schema -- the path is defined by gnome-panel for your applet.
Vincent
On 26/08/12 20:21, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 26 août 2012, à 19:15 +0200, Lanoxx
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2012, à 15:31 -0400, Dan Winship a écrit :
On 06/24/2012 02:34 PM, Shawn J. Goff wrote:
Is a system-tray implementation supposed to theme the symbolic icons
itself?
Yes. Um, it's supposed to be in the systray spec, but the online
versions of fdo specs rarely ever
Hi all,
People are contacting me every now and then about gnome-panel. There are
several people willing to work on it to improve it, but more with the
goal of making a GNOME 2-like session than a fallback session. So far,
I've been accepting all contributions, except the ones that make the
panel
Le lundi 25 juin 2012, à 12:56 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:05:43AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
But there's an interest for going in other directions, and I don't want
to block those motivated people if we don't need gnome-panel anymore for
our official GNOME
Marguerite,
(First, no need to cc me, I'm obviously subscribed to desktop-devel-list
:-))
Le mardi 15 mai 2012, à 16:40 +0800, Marguerite Su a écrit :
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
In general, choice of input method framework is not a goal in itself.
Hi,
Le lundi 23 avril 2012, à 23:23 +0200, Rui Tiago Cação Matos a écrit :
Hi,
The GNOME desktop has, up until now, supported different keyboard
layouts configuration and switching through the use of XKB and its
database of keyboard descriptions. What we have never explicitly
supported in
Hi,
Le mercredi 04 avril 2012, à 00:25 +0300, Rūdolfs Mazurs a écrit :
I think I could try to patch gnome-shell to disable workspaces and/or
disable overview mode – this could be useful for a single application
(kiosk) environment, where the top panel should be visible (time, volume
and
Le dimanche 01 avril 2012, à 23:46 +0300, Rūdolfs Mazurs a écrit :
Hello, and thanks for pointers.
The information for students is lacking in the sense, that this is a new
software, therefore fixing existing bugs or contributing to existing
modules is problematic. Should I write something
Hi,
Le dimanche 25 mars 2012, à 19:44 +0300, Rūdolfs Mazurs a écrit :
Hello all!
In the list of ideas for this year's Google Summer of Code I found the
suggestion to make a lockdown editor for GNOME 3. I thought I could try
that.
I have academic experience in writing C code and have done
Le lundi 19 mars 2012, à 09:51 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit :
Please do speak up if some important bugs are not listed here.
I'd like to add this GTK+ bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657385
Some change in GTK+ introspection broke the python bindings, and require
an incompatible
Le mardi 13 mars 2012, à 09:06 +1100, Danielle Madeley a écrit :
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:51 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Pessulus was a configuration lockdown editor for GNOME 2. It never got
ported to GNOME 3, as it more or less involves a complete rewrite (move
to
Le lundi 12 mars 2012, à 17:39 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero a écrit :
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 14:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Pessulus was a configuration lockdown editor for GNOME 2. It never got
ported to GNOME 3, as it more or less involves a complete rewrite (move
to introspection
Le mardi 13 mars 2012, à 10:11 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 14:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Pessulus was a configuration lockdown editor for GNOME 2. It never got
ported to GNOME 3, as it more or less involves a complete rewrite (move
to introspection-based
Hi,
Pessulus was a configuration lockdown editor for GNOME 2. It never got
ported to GNOME 3, as it more or less involves a complete rewrite (move
to introspection-based bindings and move to GSettings) and nobody found
the motivation to do so.
Unless someone steps up within a week to become
Le vendredi 09 mars 2012, à 12:50 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit :
===
GNOME-SESSION
===
fail whale extension list looks bad
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671693
Needs more information and testing.
I don't think it's a blocker, and we're past the
Le vendredi 09 mars 2012, à 11:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le vendredi 09 mars 2012, à 12:50 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit :
===
GNOME-SESSION
===
fail whale extension list looks
Hi,
Le samedi 28 janvier 2012, à 12:54 -0500, Colin Walters a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 17:34 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I don't think Vincent was surprised, or he really shouldn't have been:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654970#c2
Le mardi 24 janvier 2012, à 15:59 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:31:29PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:03:36PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Another systemd-related change was already mentioned earlier: the
new --enable-systemd configure flag
Hi,
Le lundi 23 janvier 2012, à 13:02 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:54:30AM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2012/1/23 Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:14:32AM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Why do you guys insist in making that a
Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011, à 13:56 -0500, Leonel Florin Selles a écrit :
Hi, I'm trying to get all the title of the opened windows on a Gnome
Desktop, for that I want to use C++, there is a way?
Here's some code that does exactly this:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 10:31 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
Hi everyone,
As most of you know, we proposed Boxes for 3.4
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 12:33 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 10:31 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
Hi everyone,
As most of you know, we proposed Boxes for 3.4 and from what I can
tell, there were no big objections in the end. There was then the
question of us actually delivering in time. As seen on planet GNOME
Le jeudi 24 novembre 2011, à 10:23 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 11:48 +0100, Pierre Wieser wrote:
Hi,
As I was googling searching why the help is not displayed for
my application, I have found [1], which states:
The desktop help has moved to the new proposed
Le lundi 07 novembre 2011, à 20:21 +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
+ Boxes
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
→ many
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011, à 17:06 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit :
+ Boxes
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree/Features/Boxes
→ many commits, mclasen will push the developers to blog a progress report
once they have something to show
While Boxes look interesting, to me, it
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011, à 14:35 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi a écrit :
Also, gnome-utils has the same unrelated tags issue of gdk-pixbuf, so
they would need to be manually selected anyway (unless we also want to
keep things tags like DROOLING_MACAQUE and
PANTING_CHIMPANZEE...seriously, I feel
Le dimanche 11 septembre 2011, à 13:41 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
If you have concerns, I'd like to hear about it. I've set the reply-to
to desktop-devel-list and distributor-list.
With a few other (non-gnome) tarballs switching to xz-only, one thing I
realized is that python doesn't support
Le vendredi 09 septembre 2011, à 13:09 +0100, Javier Jardón a écrit :
Hi all,
As you can read in the Ryan blog post [1], the use of the
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE macro is only correct when used in this way:
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE([enable])
As ryan said in the blog post, fredp made a report page
Le vendredi 09 septembre 2011, à 13:49 +0100, Javier Jardón a écrit :
On 9 September 2011 13:24, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le vendredi 09 septembre 2011, à 13:09 +0100, Javier Jardón a écrit :
Hi all,
As you can read in the Ryan blog post [1], the use of the
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011, à 18:50 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit :
gnome-menus: Tools to perform system administration should be available
in the menus somehow
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645061
Patches available in the report.
(Note that the tools are available in the Other
Hi,
In the past few months, Colin reworked the gnome-menus API to bring
various improvements. The most visible part is that the menu entries are
now based on GDesktopAppInfo, and that we now have real introspection
support. You can see some of the discussion at
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011, à 12:07 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
So far, I only have this small list:
bookmark-applet
contact-lookup-applet
deskbar-applet
gnome-netstatus
It also appears that libpanelappletmm won't get ported (and the gnote
developers decided to directly use the C
Le vendredi 01 juillet 2011, à 14:17 +0100, Ross Burton a écrit :
On 1 July 2011 13:56, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
If you intend this to be part of 3.1.3, merging it before the weekend
would be nice. That will give us a few more days to deal with possible
fallout and find a
Hi,
I guess everyone knows that GNOME 2 applets don't work in GNOME 3, and
talking here and there, the feedback I got is that it wasn't worth
creating a bridge to be able to load those in the GNOME 3 panel.
As several applets are not going to be ported to GNOME 3 (either because
the code is
Le mercredi 01 juin 2011, à 13:33 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
On 1 June 2011 12:57, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, mailing lists don't work for many kinds of productive discussion.
Agreed. In my recent discussions with the dudes in #gnome-design there
was a
Le mercredi 18 mai 2011, à 19:08 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
Hi!
Yes, it might cost us a bit to be open and friendly like this -- and to
be honest, I'm not convinced the cost is that high for GNOME code, while
it certainly is for systemd -- but our community is not just about
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011, à 19:12 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
One thing that's worth addressing though (again) is the question do
we need both Python and JavaScript?.
Why do we need to address this? Aren't we happy letting developers
choose the language they are the most comfortable with?
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011, à 21:52 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 03:11 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
snip
I was thinking that this is the kind of problem that has cross-desktop
implications, and so I wondered how KDE solves this problem. We should
probably take
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011, à 23:22 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
== Kill gnome-menus ==
gnome-menus is the library which reads all this stuff presently, and
it has one serious drawback:
* It is entirely synchronous
This especially hurts since we have to read applications from
gnome-shell,
you want to be involved in making
GNOME rock.
This year's administrators are Vincent Untz, Ruben Vermeersch, Christophe
Fergeau and Daniel Siegel.
Cheers,
The GNOME Google Summer of Code Administrators
[1] http://live.gnome.org/SummerOfCode2011
[2] http://live.gnome.org/SummerOfCode2011
Le mercredi 16 mars 2011, à 19:31 -0700, Adam Dingle a écrit :
In the current GNOME 3 build the System Settings application doesn't seem to
give me any way to change my fonts or theme. This seems like a significant
regression from the previous Control Center, which offered the Appearance
Hey,
Le mercredi 02 mars 2011, à 11:50 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
== A. diff/delta files between versions ==
I don't know of anybody using this to update from a tarball to a newer
one. However, I guess some people use this to quickly see what has
changed between the two tarballs. I don't
Le mercredi 02 mars 2011, à 12:47 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:10:09PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Conversion might take a while on master.gnome.org, but seems
manageable. Not sure if I can easily combine lzma and xdelta3.
Hrm, I wouldn't change past
Icaza (mig...@helixcode.com)
+.\ (C) 2009-2010 Vincent Untz (vu...@gnome.org)
+.\
+.TH GNOME-SESSION-QUIT 1 GNOME
+.SH NAME
+gnome-session-quit \- End the current GNOME session
+.SH SYNOPSIS
+.B gnome-session-quit [\-\-logout] [\-\-power-off] [\-\-no-prompt]
+.SH DESCRIPTION
+The \fIgnome
Le lundi 28 février 2011, à 08:25 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi Vincent,
I wrote most of gnome-session and am still listed as a maintainer.
Actually, Dan wrote most of the new gnome-session ;-)
And I'm sorry, but with two commits in 2011, two commits in 2010 and 10
commits in 2009
Le lundi 28 février 2011, à 14:53 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Also, as I wrote, it's not about you specifically, I've seen this from
several people.
Just to make it extremely clear: this is the issue I have. If people
want to step up and become co-maintainers of my modules, then please
state
Le vendredi 25 février 2011, à 18:08 -0600, Dan Williams a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:32 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
This looks like you're using a tarball for the build instead of upstream
jhbuild's module that pulls from git master? I can't seem to find
Le mercredi 09 février 2011, à 22:59 +0200, Aurimas Černius a écrit :
Hi,
Will there be a gtk2 version of libpanel-applet-3 when GNOME 3.0 is
released?
There is libpanel-applet-4 for the fallback mode in GNOME 3. There's no
plan to have a gtk2 version of it, at the moment. It's certainly
Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011, à 23:47 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to bump the minimum telepathy-glib requirement to 0.13.11, which we
need for Empathy. It's currently at 0.13.9, and 0.13.x is the unstable series
leading to the stable 0.14 release, which we'll want for
Hi,
Earlier today, I uploaded 2.91.5 modulesets at
http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.91.5/
I've run a first build, and nearly everything builds. The exceptions:
+ gobject-introspection 0.10.0. Some issue with the latest glib. It's
fine in git, and Colin is planning a release.
Hi all,
Woohoo, I'm not sure we've ever been that late for a release ;-) Bad
idea to do a release at the end of the year, it seems :-)
So all of the blockers for 2.91.4 are now fixed in git, and we even got
a new gtk-theme-engine-clearlooks with fixes.
The only thing blocking the release is
Le mercredi 29 décembre 2010, à 09:34 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le mardi 28 décembre 2010 à 16:53 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos a écrit :
Is the GNOME 3 panel compatible with the GNOME 2 applets?
There's no gnome 3 panel, gnome-panel hasn't been ported to gtk3 yet,
there's a
Le vendredi 24 décembre 2010, à 01:33 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le jeudi 23 décembre 2010, à 20:01 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
+ latest empathy doesn't build with latest gnome-keyring:
gcr-simple-certificate.c:122:1: error: conflicting types for
‘gcr_simple_certificate_new’
/gnome
Le vendredi 24 décembre 2010, à 12:31 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le vendredi 24 décembre 2010, à 01:33 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
+ there's a general issue with starting launchers: most (all?) don't
work in gnome-shell, and if I go to $prefix/share/applications in
nautilus
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010, à 21:21 +0100, Philippe Rouquier a écrit :
Hi,
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 16:24 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
brasero
===
Need fixes from git + updated eggsmclient
That is fixed after the latest changes (thanks to Mathias for updating
libegg
Hi,
I see that gnome-about got removed from gnome-desktop, with the message
that it should be replaced with the system information panel (see
http://live.gnome.org/Design/SystemSettings/SystemInformation)
Is this system information panel available somewhere? Is someone working
on it? If no, I
Le jeudi 23 décembre 2010, à 11:06 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
I see that gnome-about got removed from gnome-desktop, with the message
that it should be replaced with the system information panel (see
http://live.gnome.org/Design/SystemSettings/SystemInformation)
Is this system
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010, à 16:24 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
I've been trying to build GNMOE 2.91.4 from tarballs, and it's not
looking good at all :-)
Thanks to everybody who helped. We've made good progress, but we're
still not there:
+ I need to test latest gnome-packagekit
Hey,
Quick update:
Le jeudi 23 décembre 2010, à 20:01 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
+ I need to test latest gnome-packagekit evince tarball, but they
should build fine now.
Works fine.
+ latest empathy doesn't build with latest gnome-keyring:
gcr-simple-certificate.c:122:1: error
Hi,
I've been trying to build GNMOE 2.91.4 from tarballs, and it's not
looking good at all :-)
Matthias already mentioned some breakages caused by GTK+ 2.91.7, but
it's not just that.
Here are the tarballs that I have and that don't build:
brasero 2.91.3
evolution-data-server
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010, à 16:24 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Here are the tarballs that I have and that don't build:
I forgot clutter-gtk (might be fixed in git).
Also, libchamplain builds against GTK+2. Since our main use is in
empathy right now, it means we can't use it all.
Vincent
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010, à 21:02 +0100, Xan Lopez a écrit :
WebKitGTK+ and ephy are not in the list (I guess you gave up on
them!), but they don't actually work with GTK+ 2.91.7 either (they
worked with what was on master the day I released). I'll try to make
new releases ASAP of both.
Hi,
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010, à 11:28 +0100, Dirk Wallenstein a écrit :
Hi,
I just released x-jhbuild-0.2 and as it can be used with gnome, too, I
thought I post a note.
What's the difference between x-jhbuild and jhbuild? :-)
Thanks,
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
Le mercredi 20 octobre 2010, à 22:29 +0300, Zeeshan Ali a écrit :
Hi,
gupnp-av doesn't build with error on introspection.
http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2202
Vincent pointed this issue out two weeks ago and it has been fixed
in git master ever since. I asked if a
Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010, à 17:02 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
outside of
Le jeudi 14 octobre 2010, à 15:38 +0200, Jan de Groot a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:50 -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
Hi, folks.
Will we have a gnome-panel ported to gtk3? We need it for gnome 3 as
fallback for gnome-shell, right?
It will eventually, yes. Help welcome, etc. Note that
Le lundi 11 octobre 2010, à 23:20 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen a écrit :
I would like to elaborate on one very important thing that you
mention, and that is that if a project chooses not to follow the GNOME
release schedule, the key is information. So when/(if) this happens it
has to be extremely
Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010, à 17:08 +0200, Piñeiro a écrit :
From: Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de
Hi!
Initially, for GNOME 3.0, it will be populated with the modules from the
GNOME 2.x Desktop moduleset. However, we would like to slowly migrate
some modules to the Applications
Le samedi 09 octobre 2010, à 09:25 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 à 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
API/ABI Stable Platfom
==
The API/ABI Stable Platfom works in the exact same way as the GNOME 2.x
moduleset, but it can also include
Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010, à 16:50 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
+ feedback will not be centered around the goal of the application,
but about its technical merits:
- use of GNOME technologies
- integration
Le mardi 12 octobre 2010, à 12:10 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit :
b) we enforce a GNOME stats/translation tool, and we make the necessary
steps so as it supports distributed development. For example, that could
mean that the tool on l10n.gnome.org hosts an i18n version of each tracked
branch
Hi,
The release team updated the proposal to reorganize the modulesets. We
discussed a first version back in June [1], and there are a few visible
changes:
- we added a system platform category in the platform, and we now also
talk about dbus services there.
- we listened to the feedback
Le mardi 05 octobre 2010, à 18:41 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
Hi!
I'm pretty sure the GNOME infrastructure could do the same thing: get
the POT file from git.clutter-project.org (it's generated by gettext and
stored in the repository anyway); send me an email with the PO file once
Le mardi 28 septembre 2010, à 16:55 +0200, Guillaume Desmottes a écrit :
Hi,
Empathy 2.91.x/3.0 will depend on telepathy-glib 0.13.x.
We just released telepathy-glib 0.13.0 [1] which starts the new cycle.
Plans for this cycle include the very popular high level API on
Telepathy channels
Hi,
We're quite close to 2.32.0. Thanks to everyone who helped today!
There are still a few issues:
+ some modules need a new release to get a working introspection build:
- clutter-gtk, and it's already fixed in git:
Le lundi 27 septembre 2010, à 08:54 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
Hi!
A first draft for the GNOME 2.91/3.0 schedule is now available at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone .
What happened to the discussion about a some kind of new module structure
that we discussed some
Hey all,
The deadline for 2.32.0 tarballs has passed :-) I've taken a look at
modules that didn't get a tarball, and found that we could do with some
more tarballs. See the list below.
I'll likely go ahead and release tarballs tomorrow (at least for the
modules where there is no real code change
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, à 12:47 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
I'm working on 2.31.92, and it's fun. Or actually, it's not :-) Help
from various maintainers is needed to make this release happen.
So, we finally got the new glib. I'm back with new issues, though...
totem: still
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010, à 09:40 +1000, Danielle Madeley a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 12:47 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
- telepathy-glib: Namespace conflict for
'iface_quark_connection_manager'. I think that's
something that should get fixed in g
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, à 12:47 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
I'm working on 2.31.92, and it's fun. Or actually, it's not :-) Help
from various maintainers is needed to make this release happen.
Most of the issues are now fixed (still waiting for a few tarballs, but
I'm sure they'll come
Hi,
I'm working on 2.31.92, and it's fun. Or actually, it's not :-) Help
from various maintainers is needed to make this release happen.
First, let me introduce a new rule:
Rule: the release team will feel free to commit to any module where
*_DISABLE_DEPRECATED or -Werror flags are
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, à 12:47 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Next is gobject-introspection: Colin has been working hard to fix
various issues (still waiting for a new gobject-introspection tarball
with those fixes, though). Unfortunately, it turns out that this breaks
some builds:
I
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, à 11:09 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
- gstreamer: we need the gstreamer fix from
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550616.
However, there's
Le samedi 07 août 2010, à 16:40 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
For years, gnome-desktop has shipped with old icons that get installed
in /usr/share/pixmaps. See
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-desktop/tree/pixmaps
Unless somebody shouts loud in the next few days, I'll remove those
Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 16:32 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 15:54 +0200, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Apart from this there are no dependency changes in libchamplain.
Thanks for the detailed answer. +1 for the bump.
There was no objection, let's do it. Can someone bump
Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 13:54 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
For GNOME 2.32 I'm branching my modules from 2.30 and backporting easy
stuff from git master. 90% of my development effort is going towards
GNOME 3, which is happening on git master. Git master in most of my
modules depends on
Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 15:25 +0200, Jiří Techet a écrit :
I'm a maintainer of the libchamplain library and I would like to ask
if its version number in external dependencies could be incremented to
the latest release. The version found in
gnome-external-deps-2.32.modules of jhbuild is 0.4.5.
Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 15:54 +0200, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Apart from this there are no dependency changes in libchamplain.
Thanks for the detailed answer. +1 for the bump.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
desktop-devel-list
Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 15:39 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
On 9 August 2010 14:15, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
You can release 2.90.x (not sure why you'd want 2.91 before 2.90 ;-)).
Some modules already have such versions.
90 is an even number, and thus 'stable', surely?
Ah
1 - 100 of 699 matches
Mail list logo
