On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:41 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Andre,
* http://live.gnome.org/GtkPrintPort :
gnome-games, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-devel-docs (update)
* http://live.gnome.org/GioPort :
PATCHES:
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I don't think that gnome-python-desktop would need removing GtkPrint
and gnomeVFS, it contains GnomePrint python bindings which cannot be
removed and I cannot find any reference to GnomeVFS that needs to be
removed.
If I'm mistaking please correct me,
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 20:43 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
(Better late than never.)
Take a look, test help out, comment if there's important bugs that are
not listed here, make 2.26 rock.
EVOLUTION
Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 23:10 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Which is why putting this in gnome-python-extras is a good solution:
this will still be available if it's needed, but it won't be part of
GNOME (since nothing in GNOME depends on it anymore).
From the downstream POV, this only
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:41 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Andre,
* http://live.gnome.org/GtkPrintPort :
gnome-games, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-devel-docs (update)
* http://live.gnome.org/GioPort :
PATCHES:
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit :
Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform?
We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now.
Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I
believe.
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit :
Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform?
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations
We've been
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Andre I think there are some misunderstanding, or if not, I'm the one
misunderstanding :)
Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform?
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 20:31 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now.
Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I
believe.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so
unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point
in talking about porting.
That's the whole point: we don't want to ship libgnomeprint*
2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so
unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point
in talking about porting.
That's
2009-02-24 klockan 21:37 skrev Alberto Ruiz:
2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so
unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there
[Note: cutting down To/Cc, I only left lists/teams)
2009-02-24 klockan 22:47 skrev Cosimo Cecchi:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 22:27 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
- If a deprecated library is still shipped
- then the language bindings for that deprecated library should also be
shipped.
-
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:03 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
There is no way to find out who is actually using the Python (or whatever
language) bindings for a given library. Some may have custom applications
around, and just dropping support while the underlying library is not
officially
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so
unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point
in talking about
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:12 +0100, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so
unless GnomePrint is
(Better late than never.)
Take a look, test help out, comment if there's important bugs that are
not listed here, make 2.26 rock.
EVOLUTION
Camel Disk summary meta bug
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Andre,
* http://live.gnome.org/GtkPrintPort :
gnome-games, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-devel-docs (update)
* http://live.gnome.org/GioPort :
PATCHES: dasher
TODO: gnome-python-desktop, gnome-utils/gsearchtool
I don't
18 matches
Mail list logo
