On 05/11/2012 11:30 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2012/5/11 Martyn Russell:
On 05/10/2012 08:24 PM, John Stowers wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought GNOME only depended on
tracker-store and not the indexer?
The two are in the same tarball release, so it would be up to packagers to
sep
2012/5/11 Martyn Russell :
> On 05/10/2012 08:24 PM, John Stowers wrote:
>>
>> Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought GNOME only depended on
>> tracker-store and not the indexer?
>
>
> The two are in the same tarball release, so it would be up to packagers to
> separate them and AFAIK, that's not
On 05/10/2012 08:24 PM, John Stowers wrote:
The point is that we already use Tracker in GNOME (Documents and Boxes
depend on it) and I don't see any reason for existing apps to stop
using it and while we could compromise on some code-duplication, its
certainly a big issue if there is two entitie
>
> The point is that we already use Tracker in GNOME (Documents and Boxes
> depend on it) and I don't see any reason for existing apps to stop
> using it and while we could compromise on some code-duplication, its
> certainly a big issue if there is two entities harvesting metadata
> from tons of
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 19:10 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> We would gladly ONLY index data that's of interest to the user/desktop
> applications if you could come up with heuristics for that. I touched on
> that somewhat in my response earlier. Also, having superfluous coverage
> is better than
It is my understanding that Jon had discussions with the developers of these
applications, and for various reasons it was decided that writing something
from scratch is better. For EoG and GThumb the reason given was that their
maintainers did not have time to work on a major redesign, and for Sho
On 05/10/2012 06:32 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:14 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
and a commercial backer. These are VERY important thin
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
...
> That's not a reason at all, Yorba seems open to work on making Shotwell more
> GNOME 3 friendly... so those widgets can be shared anyway
>
>>
>> Therefore, for these reasons, if you look at the gnome-photos tree, it
>> is almost a cl
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:14 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
> > and a commercial backer. These are VERY important things, prolly the most
> > important things
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
> and a commercial backer. These are VERY important things, prolly the most
> important things to take into account, you worry too much about the data
> store technol
2012/5/9 Debarshi Ray
> > hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
>
> Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop
> Summit.
> You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
>
> For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
> was a photo man
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 02:47 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> So from Shotwell's point of view, would it make sense to replace its
> existing SQLite store and UI? Would it not be as good as writing from
> scratch?
Shotwell's database is presumably optimized for what Shotwell needs to
do. Tracker, as a
On 05/10/2012 03:47 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a ph
> hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a photo manager that I wrote during the dying day
A quick followup: in my last post I didn't mean to accuse the GNOME design team
of being uncooperative. In fact, we have had some past discussions about this
in which we've realized that there are differences between Shotwell today and
the vision in the GNOME Photos design document, both in the
Debarshi,
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Shotwell's goals are exactly those laid out in the design document below: to be
a lightweight, elegant photo browser/viewer for GNOME supporting basic
manipulation, easy photo sharing/publishing, slideshows and so on. If the
GNOME team feels tha
Hello everybody!
Around 10 days ago I started implementing Photos as laid out in these designs:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Photos
The Git tree is at: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-photos
Currently the application does not do much other than showing a blank window,
but most of the und
17 matches
Mail list logo
