On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 11:03 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> That's an option, but instead I've been pushing to get the rustc
> ports for
> official Debian architectures fixed for some time already,
>
Thanks for working on this! I hope it's something that just takes some
time to get don
On 18/12/17 18:11, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 14:48 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> [dropping distributor-list from the thread]
>
>> We'd love to switch in Debian, but
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rustc&suite=unstable
>>
>> is effectively prevent
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 14:48 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
[dropping distributor-list from the thread]
> We'd love to switch in Debian, but
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rustc&suite=unstable
>
> is effectively preventing us from doing that.
> Looks like Firefox 57 is not comin
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-12-16 16:04 GMT+01:00 Nirbheek Chauhan :
>> I think Debian should start using librsvg 2.41 and arch teams should
>> just deal with that reality.
>
> We can't do that unfortuanetly, as this would make librsvg
> uninstallable on half of ou
2017-12-16 16:04 GMT+01:00 Nirbheek Chauhan :
> I think Debian should start using librsvg 2.41 and arch teams should
> just deal with that reality.
We can't do that unfortuanetly, as this would make librsvg
uninstallable on half of our architectures. Which in turn means the
library could never mig
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Our porters, from what I know, tried to bootstrap rust on various
> architectures but run into multiple issues.
> A few of them you can see at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=rustc
>
> If you need more details, I can ask t
2017-12-16 15:03 GMT+01:00 Nirbheek Chauhan :
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> 2017-12-16 1:28 GMT+01:00 Federico Mena Quintero :
>>> People are *STRONGLY* encouraged to switch to 2.41.x as soon as
>>> possible. Librsvg 2.41.x is ABI and API compatible with 2.40.x, so it
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-12-16 1:28 GMT+01:00 Federico Mena Quintero :
>> People are *STRONGLY* encouraged to switch to 2.41.x as soon as
>> possible. Librsvg 2.41.x is ABI and API compatible with 2.40.x, so it
>> is a drop-in replacement. You only need a Rust
2017-12-16 1:28 GMT+01:00 Federico Mena Quintero :
> Hello,
>
> I have just released librsvg-2.40.20. This is the last release that I
> will make in the 2.40.x series - the C-only version.
>
> This release is to avoid having unreleased commits in the 2.40 branch.
> It also has a security fix.
>
>
Hello,
I have just released librsvg-2.40.20. This is the last release that I
will make in the 2.40.x series - the C-only version.
This release is to avoid having unreleased commits in the 2.40 branch.
It also has a security fix.
People are *STRONGLY* encouraged to switch to 2.41.x as soon as
p
10 matches
Mail list logo
