Can you please elaborate why GAJ was not accepted...
We are still clueless :)
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Thorsten Prante thors...@prante.eu wrote:
Purpose:
GNOME Activity Journal is not a File Browser but an Activity Browser.
It uses the Zeitgeist Framework to display what you did
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 12:42 +0200 schrieb Seif Lotfy:
Can you please elaborate why GAJ was not accepted...
Wrong thread?
Plus you = release-team?
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
The idea behind the Activity Journal was both misinterpreted or
misrepresented. Some where along the line people began to think
zeitgeist features around the desktop was the goal of the Activity
Journal, however the Activity Journal is really a centralized event
browser not a collective project.
I recall that the framework was desireable, but a lot of the features of GAJ
could be sucked into Nautilus and possibly we don't need a separate app.
Again this is just from memory, (in a conf, dont' have time to look it up
but wanted to chime in) but I'm sure someone from the release team can
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Thorsten Prante thors...@prante.eu wrote:
Purpose:
GNOME Activity Journal is not a File Browser but an Activity Browser.
It uses the Zeitgeist Framework to display what you did and introduces a
better way of quickly finding the things that you were doing.
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME, especially now
that libzeitgeist has appeared, however that has little to do with the
Journal which is a centralized activity browser. That is to say adding
a Most Used feature in Nautilus or a Recently Opened With feature in
shell would use
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B:
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME
Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with
*concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for nice to have)?
Thanks a lot,
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net |
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 19:22 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B:
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME
Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with
*concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for nice to
2010/5/6 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org:
* How does this affect resource consumption on the desktop - if I
don't ever launch Activity Journal, is Zeitgeist running?
That depends on whether there is something else using it. Zeitgeist
won't start until something starts it via D-Bus activation,
This is just a quick note. People often confuse Zeitgeist with the
Activity Journal. The Journal is a centralized activity browser that
uses Zeitgeist. Other implementations around the GNOME desktop will
use Zeitgeist directly unless they just want to just display a
specific day in the journal or
Some further comments below.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Randy B [mailto:email.t...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 02:33
An: Colin Walters
Cc: Thorsten Prante; desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Betreff: Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal
This is just a quick
Purpose:
GNOME Activity Journal is not a File Browser but an Activity Browser.
It uses the Zeitgeist Framework to display what you did and introduces a
better way of quickly finding the things that you were doing.
Target: desktop
Dependencies:
Zeitgeist (external)
PyGTK
Python 2.5
12 matches
Mail list logo
