On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:33 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
Does Anjuta have (or do the developers plan to have)
glade-like or devhelp-like functionality built in
I had some long chats with Naba at foss.in this year, and among other
things I saw devhelp and glade3 integrated in seamlessly [I gather
On 06/01/2008, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007, à 04:52 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/anjuta/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gdl/trunk/
On Jan 6, 2008 10:00 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
We do want the stand-alone apps for the old coders like us, don't we? I
don't think it's only a few coders here and there...
(there's integration with glade3 and devhelp in anjuta)
I think we want stand alone apps too, in
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:47 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Summary so far:
===
+ nothing :-)
+ FWIW, anjuta was proposed for 2.18, but there were no 2.x release at
this point and the 1.2.x versions were unmaintained.
+ Comments from the thread on the old proposal:
Hi,
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007, à 04:52 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/anjuta/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gdl/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-build/trunk/
Proposal on
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:47 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007, à 04:52 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/anjuta/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gdl/trunk/
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2008 alle 23.47 +0100, Vincent Untz ha scritto:
If you use anjuta, speak up. If you have tried anjuta, speak up. If the
name anjuta makes you feel something, speak up. If you want to be the
next big movie star, speak up. Now.
Hi, as a new contributor to the GNOME project,
Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008, à 17:33 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit :
If we want to have an IDE in our devtools release set
(and honestly, what's the point of a devtools release
set without an IDE?), then Anjuta seems like the most
natural choice.
Hmm, yes, it was probably not clear from my
As I ever ported anjuta to Solaris platform, I'd like to say something
here:
1. Anjuta is really helpful and attractive to new developers for Gtk
+/GNOME.
2. It does have glade and devhelp built-in.
3. For users who are used to use IDE, anjuta is first choice under GNOME
environment. Although we
