Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread John Stowers
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:11 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:02 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: 2) Mutter could be renamed as a project to mutter (binary, GConf schemas, etc. Presumably, the internals

Re: GSoc- Nautilus: Add support to Google docs

2009-03-25 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-03-25 klockan 06:20 skrev Ajay: I am a  postgraduate student of Computer Science Engg. I am planning to work on Nautilus: Add support to Google docs topic as Google Summer of Code project. I was thinking of performing following steps.    1). I can use Google Documents List Data API

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Ross Burton
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 19:42 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: Eh, for now compiz is working and is the reference WM for linux (and more) Interesting point of view. I thought that the reference window manager for GNOME was Metacity, what with it being the only window manager which is in the GNOME

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Sam Spilsbury
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:17 +0900, Sam Spilsbury wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Hi! 2) Mutter could be renamed as a project to mutter (binary, GConf schemas, etc.

Re: GSoc- Nautilus: Add support to Google docs

2009-03-25 Thread Adam Schreiber
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Ajay ajay.kr@gmail.com wrote:    4). As native format is concern, i can download/upload in the ODT or DOC format and it will not create any issues. I would think ODT would be better on 2 fronts, encouraging freedom and avoiding any DOC import filter

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! To try and make GNOME Shell integrate with multiple window managers would either greatly constrain the user interface vision or greatly increase the amount of work involved. The power of the GNOME shell approach is that we are working within the desktop scene graph of the window

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Owen Taylor
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 20:54 +0900, Sam Spilsbury wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:17 +0900, Sam Spilsbury wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Hi! 2) Mutter could be

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Steve Frécinaux
Owen Taylor wrote: So, basically, no I don't see a way that GNOME Shell coexists with Compiz other than as two separate shells for the GNOME desktop. IMHO, rather than looking for gnome-shell to work with compiz or another VM, one should rather try and make a way for applets to work on

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Sam Spilsbury
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Hi! To try and make GNOME Shell integrate with multiple window managers would either greatly constrain the user interface vision or greatly increase the amount of work involved. The power of the GNOME shell approach is

Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28

2009-03-25 Thread Sam Spilsbury
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 20:54 +0900, Sam Spilsbury wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:17 +0900, Sam Spilsbury wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:18 AM,