Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2009-August/msg7.html
The response was positive.
On 18/08/09 13:05, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
...
Dependencies about to be dropped but still needed:
gmime
lex
yacc
libraptor
I forgot to add, librasqal will also be dropped soon (mentioned below).
The git repository is here:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/
We import the
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new
GNOME module.
though I've seen the amount of work that has been done on it, I admit
I'm still ambivalent on Tracker, and the fact that nobody has come clear
with the
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
libxml = 0.6
libpng = 1.2
libuuid
zlib
dbus = 0.60
sqlite3 = 3.5 (built with --enable-load-extension)
hal = 0.5
vala = 0.7.3
pango = 1.0.0
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Luis Medinaslmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
hal = 0.5
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
deprecated soon afaik.
...or rather by libgudev, there is no such thing as DeviceKit :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Patryk Zawadzkipat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Luis Medinaslmedi...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
hal = 0.5
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
deprecated
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:57 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
deprecated soon afaik.
Richard Hughes has already ported the battery handling of Tracker to
DeviceKit-power. It's used if available, otherwise HAL is used. The
volume handling
William Jon McCann wrote:
So, in preparation for GNOME Shell and 3.0 a number of us have been
trying to address various inconsistencies in how we name applications.
[...]
What do you think? (please read the blog post before answering)
After further discussion on the XDG mailing list and
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Frederic Petersfpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Is everybody ok to proceed ?
Sounds good to me.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On 18/08/09 13:42, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new
GNOME module.
though I've seen the amount of work that has been done on it, I admit
I'm still ambivalent on Tracker, and
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Frederic Petersfpet...@gnome.org wrote:
- If Name is just the application name, leave it alone
- If there is no GenericName, leave it alone
- If Name == GenericName: remove GenericName
- If Name embeds both the application name and the generic name
-
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:06 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
William Jon McCann wrote:
So, in preparation for GNOME Shell and 3.0 a number of us have been
trying to address various inconsistencies in how we name applications.
[...]
What do you think? (please read the blog post before
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Impact for translations: at most a new string for each modules, with
the application brand name (that could be left alone, for languages
that do not do transliteration).
Will we get automagic translator comments so that Rhythmbox doesn't
get translated to Boîte à
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate tracker-store should be considered for inclusion separately
the store does not do any
On 18/08/09 16:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The indexer part is optional
Well, right now it isn't but it will be at some point sure.
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The indexer part is optional
Well, right now it isn't but it will be at some point sure.
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If
On Tue, 18.08.09 17:20, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
Uh, generally bugs should be fixed, not worked around. Especially if
they are as crucial as this one.
Sure but getting a recursive inotify will likely take years as with
most kernel features (= development time +
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is
On Tue, 18.08.09 17:26, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
Uh, generally bugs should be fixed, not worked around. Especially if
they are as crucial as this one.
Sure but getting a recursive
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:24 +0300, Xan Lopez wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com)
wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Maciej Piechotkauzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
It can be used directly by applications that feed it data through an
API. Zeitgeist is an example, another could be bookmarks/history
storage in Epiphany.
Xan
Hmm. Is it one-in-all database? Then:
- How you keep
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:24, Xan Lopez (x...@gnome.org) wrote:
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the
separate tracker-store should be considered for inclusion
On 18/08/09 16:07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hmm. The beef I have with Tracker (and Beagle fwiw) is that they build
something on infrastructure that currently is not good enough
to sustain it: inotify. inotify is simply not
On 18/08/09 16:25, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
That doesn't make any sense to me either. On its own it is useless then,
at least with the file system crawler it can populate the database and
be usable.
Its not useless if apps like zeitgeist
Xan Lopez wrote:
It can be used directly by applications that feed it data through an
API. Zeitgeist is an example, another could be bookmarks/history
storage in Epiphany.
Do you mean storing actual bookmarks into the database ?
I would be quite reluctant in mixing actual data with
2009/8/18 Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com:
On 18/08/09 16:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The indexer part is optional
Well, right now it isn't but it will be at some point sure.
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:44 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hmm. The beef I have with Tracker (and Beagle fwiw) is that they build
something on infrastructure that currently is not
On 18/08/09 16:57, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:44 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hmm. The beef I have with Tracker (and Beagle fwiw) is that they build
something on
2009/8/18 Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Maciej Piechotkauzytkown...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have no idea if Tracker uses just one huge file for everything or if
it can use one file per application/domain/whatever (and in any case
that's an implementation detail not
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:50 +0200, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Xan Lopez wrote:
It can be used directly by applications that feed it data through an
API. Zeitgeist is an example, another could be bookmarks/history
storage in Epiphany.
Do you mean storing actual bookmarks into the database ?
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:57 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:57, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:44 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hmm. The beef I have
On 18/08/09 17:03, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:57 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
We already do that. But some projects have a LOT of directories ;)
do we? It still indexes all source files for me. Just to be clear I mean
skipping a directory called Gnome if it contains a
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:02 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:03, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:57 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
We already do that. But some projects have a LOT of directories ;)
do we? It still indexes all source files for me. Just to be clear
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 17:40 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
I might not be fully up to date on all these things, but has Zeitgeist
even been submitted as a module yet?
Not yet.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Rob Taylor wrote:
So we discussed this at the kernel-fixing-bof at GCDS. IIRC we basically
decided that being able to have a recursive inotify with a new flag was
the best option. Matthew Garrett was planning on taking the issues that
we discussed to
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:55 +0300, Xan Lopez wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
snip
If tracker-store is not useful on its own and currently not used by
anything else in GNOME, does it really make sense to push it into
GNOME?
Also,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for this and that would work for
ordinary users but not devs fetching source code or other command line
stuff
Unless it's really REALLY compelling and fast, I don't want
On 18/08/09 17:06, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:02 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:03, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:57 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
We already do that. But some projects have a LOT of directories ;)
do we? It still indexes
On 18/08/09 17:11, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for this and that would work for
ordinary users but not devs fetching source code or other command line
stuff
Unless it's
On 18/08/09 17:07, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:55 +0300, Xan Lopez wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
snip
If tracker-store is not useful on its own and currently not used by
anything else in GNOME, does it really make
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:11 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for this and that would work for
ordinary users but not devs fetching source code or other command line
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You
On Tue, 18.08.09 16:44, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
As I see it the usefulness of Tracker stands or falls with the
scalablity of inotify. As long as inotify does not natively support
recursive watches tracker is not viable.
Well file monitoring really is just one part of
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:24 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 11:57 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:44 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 16:07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 13:05, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hmm. The beef I have with Tracker (and Beagle fwiw) is that
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:16, Maciej Piechotka (uzytkown...@gmail.com) wrote:
Licensing wise, those libinotify and rasqal both share the LGPL, as does
libtracker. The rest is GPLv2 or later.
/discuss ;)
Well. Currently there are two projects which, at least for the first
sight, are
On 18/08/09 17:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 16:44, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
As I see it the usefulness of Tracker stands or falls with the
scalablity of inotify. As long as inotify does not natively support
recursive watches tracker is not viable.
Well file
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:55, Xan Lopez (x...@gnome.org) wrote:
If tracker-store is not useful on its own and currently not used by
anything else in GNOME, does it really make sense to push it into
GNOME?
Also, even if the store has uses besides the indexer, just be honest:
does it *really*
On 18/08/09 17:44, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I don't think it would be a good idea to use GNOME solely as a vehicle
to make things more popular with other developers...
Actually, we want to be in GNOME not only for availability but also to
have a release schedule to run with. Right now we are
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Rodrigo Moya:
I might be wrong and things might have changed, but isn't beagle
unmaintained?
According to http://git.gnome.org/cgit/beagle/log/ it is not
unmaintained but most probably has less developers/parties working on it
than on tracker:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:55, Xan Lopez (x...@gnome.org) wrote:
If tracker-store is not useful on its own and currently not used by
anything else in GNOME, does it really make sense to push it into
GNOME?
Also,
On Tue, 18.08.09 16:11, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for this and that would work for
ordinary users but not devs fetching source code or other
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:41 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:16, Maciej Piechotka (uzytkown...@gmail.com) wrote:
Licensing wise, those libinotify and rasqal both share the LGPL, as does
libtracker. The rest is GPLv2 or later.
/discuss ;)
Well.
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 17:47 +0100, Martyn Russell a écrit :
On 18/08/09 17:44, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I don't think it would be a good idea to use GNOME solely as a vehicle
to make things more popular with other developers...
Actually, we want to be in GNOME not only
On 18/08/09 16:53, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2009/8/18 Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com:
On 18/08/09 16:18, Jamie McCracken wrote:
The indexer part is optional
Well, right now it isn't but it will be at some point sure.
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be
On Tue, 18.08.09 17:44, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
And that exists? What providers are there besides the indexer?
Yes, there are some in progress right now.
So there's nothing usable yet?
We also are using breadth based monitoring so top level folders always
get priority
On 18/08/09 17:48, Dan Winship wrote:
On 08/18/2009 12:32 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
The only reason you're suggesting tracker-store shouldn't be called
tracker is due to the social stigma associated with what Tracker is,
i.e. all about the file system.
The stigma associated with Tracker is
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jürg Billeterj...@bitron.ch wrote:
the battery handling of Tracker
I probably have missed some part of tracker's mission...
Why is tracker handling batteries ?
For instance to
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:35 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 16:11, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for this and that would work
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:21 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the consensus is
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:14 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:11, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for this and that would work for
ordinary users but not devs
On 18/08/09 18:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 17:44, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
And that exists? What providers are there besides the indexer?
Yes, there are some in progress right now.
So there's nothing usable yet?
No :)
Right but source is less
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:15 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:07, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:55 +0300, Xan Lopez wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
snip
If tracker-store is not useful on its own and
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:48, Dan Winship wrote:
On 08/18/2009 12:32 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
The only reason you're suggesting tracker-store shouldn't be called
tracker is due to the social stigma associated with what Tracker is,
i.e. all
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:36 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
[CUT]
Hmm. Is it one-in-all database? Then:
- How you keep it out of corruption. Hardware and software errors
happens and sometimes one lost files. If it is one file - ok I can live
with it. If it is one-in-all file - ops (and please
On 18/08/09 18:50, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:48, Dan Winship wrote:
On 08/18/2009 12:32 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
The only reason you're suggesting tracker-store shouldn't be called
tracker is due to the social stigma
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 18:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
On 18/08/09 17:48, Dan Winship wrote:
The stigma associated with Tracker is because historically the tracker
hackers have been unable to describe what the non-filesystem-indexing
part of Tracker does without
[...]
claiming
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.dewrote:
I guess a problem here is that nobody except the Tracker people
themselves even know what an ontology or Nepomuk actually is.
You can consider an ontology as high level language to describe data, a
language to
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:50 +0200, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Xan Lopez wrote:
It can be used directly by applications that feed it data through an
API. Zeitgeist is an example, another could be bookmarks/history
storage in Epiphany.
Do you mean storing actual bookmarks into the database ?
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 11:32 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Couldn't you just make gio (or gedit or OpenOffice) notify you every
time it closes a file instead of monitoring bazillions of files? I'm
not very likely to search for files I've never opened anyway.
we could use the Gtk
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 19:57 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 18:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
On 18/08/09 17:48, Dan Winship wrote:
The stigma associated with Tracker is because historically the tracker
hackers have been unable to describe what the
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 19:40 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:14 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:11, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jamie
McCrackenjamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
we could use the Gtk Recent files stuff for
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a
non-vague way and improve the communication of the project's members,
about the project, towards the community.
Maybe just clearly state what tracker (or
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 19:21 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 11:32 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Couldn't you just make gio (or gedit or OpenOffice) notify you every
time it closes a file instead of monitoring bazillions of files? I'm
not very likely to
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 19:21 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
[CUT]
Unfortunately, as soon as we have this, it is only a small
feature-creep step to lets index all .c/.h files to extract comments in
the API documentation - which (I suspect) then commits you to the
disaster of irritating a
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:44 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
snip
Or in short: just f*ing fix the kernel first.
Are you volunteering? :)
I am not hacking on Tracker, am I?
And Tracker is not the kernel either, it is also not the only
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a
non-vague way and improve the communication of the project's members,
about the project, towards the
On 18/08/09 19:17, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:44 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 18/08/09 17:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
snip
Or in short: just f*ing fix the kernel first.
Are you volunteering? :)
I am not hacking on Tracker, am I?
And Tracker is not the kernel
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a
non-vague way and improve the communication of the project's members,
about the project, towards the
On Tue, 18.08.09 14:48, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
We'll do our best and are committed to formulate our answers in a
non-vague way and improve
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:43, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
So you are telling me file system notification does not matter much
for Tracker's usefulness? That's news to me indeed. But of course
leads to the question: what is it then what it offers that desn't need
file system
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 14:48, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19 +0200, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
We'll do our best and are
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 19:52 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
I didn't say that and that is not the case either. I did talk to various
people about improving the problems we have at GCDS this year. I also am
not against fixing it or helping towards fixing it. I just resent people
saying that we
On Tue, 18.08.09 21:09, Patryk Zawadzki (pat...@pld-linux.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de
wrote:
(I don't want to create the impression that I am opposed to the idea
of a desktop search engine. I actually do believe it makes sense, but
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 21:06 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:43, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
So you are telling me file system notification does not matter much
for Tracker's usefulness? That's news to me indeed. But of course
leads to the question: what
On Tue, 18.08.09 15:12, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
tracker would provide a centralised storage of metadata which means
multiple apps can share metadata safely, get notifications when it
changes and know at design time what metadata is potentially available
On Tue, 18.08.09 15:15, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
I should also add, inotify is not the ONLY technology which we have been
discussing, setrlimit() is another and I could probably list a few
others which we have been talking about with kernel developers.
I
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
SPARQL:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
Are people actually intended to use that to get informations from the
tracker gui ?
Speaking of which, is there a gui or something ?
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:12 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 14:48, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com)
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 18 août 2009, à 20:19
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Maciej Piechotkauzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
Epiphany does not share its metadata with anyone else nor can you cross
query it
I believe that gnome do and/or deskbar do it quite well w/out tracker.
No, they have to go and manually parse the private file
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 21:43 +0200, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
SPARQL:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
Are people actually intended to use that to get informations from the
tracker gui ?
No, did somebody tell you that?
If you are an application developer then
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 21:43 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:12 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Epiphany does not share its metadata with anyone else nor can you cross
query it
I believe that gnome do
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
